Bioengineering Laboratory, GRJ-1215, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Apr;92(4):916-26. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01610.
Knowledge of in vivo glenohumeral joint contact mechanics after total shoulder arthroplasty may provide insight for the improvement of patient function, implant longevity, and surgical technique. The objective of this study was to determine the in vivo glenohumeral joint contact locations in patients after total shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that the glenohumeral joint articular contact would be centered on the glenoid surface because of the ball-in-socket geometric features of the implants.
Dual-plane fluoroscopic images and computer-aided design models were used to quantify patient-specific glenohumeral articular contact in thirteen shoulders following total shoulder arthroplasty. The reconstructed shoulder was imaged at arm positions of 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees of abduction (in the coronal plane) and neutral rotation and at 90 degrees of abduction with maximum internal and external rotation. The patients were individually investigated, and their glenohumeral joint contact centroids were reported with use of contact frequency.
In all positions, the glenohumeral joint contact centroids were not found at the center of the glenoid surface but at an average distance (and standard deviation) of 11.0 +/- 4.3 mm from the glenoid center. Forty (62%) of the sixty-five total contact occurrences were found on the superior-posterior quadrant of the glenoid surface. The position of 0 degrees of abduction in neutral rotation exhibited the greatest variation of quadrant contact location; however, no contact was found on the superior-anterior quadrant of the glenoid surface in this position.
In vivo, glenohumeral joint contact after total shoulder arthroplasty is not centered on the glenoid surface, suggesting that kinematics after shoulder arthroplasty may not be governed by ball-in-socket mechanics as traditionally thought. Although contact locations as a function of arm position vary among patients, the superior-posterior quadrant seems to experience the most articular contact in the shoulder positions tested.
了解全肩关节置换术后盂肱关节的体内接触力学情况,可为改善患者功能、延长假体寿命和改进手术技术提供参考。本研究旨在确定全肩关节置换术后患者盂肱关节的体内接触位置。我们假设,由于假体的球窝几何特征,盂肱关节的关节接触将集中在关节盂表面。
使用双平面荧光透视图像和计算机辅助设计模型来量化 13 例全肩关节置换术后患者的特定于患者的盂肱关节接触情况。在冠状面中立位、外展 0 度、45 度和 90 度以及最大内旋和外旋位下对重建后的肩部进行成像。对每位患者进行单独研究,并根据接触频率报告盂肱关节接触质心。
在所有位置,盂肱关节接触质心都未位于关节盂表面的中心,而是位于关节盂中心平均距离(和标准差)为 11.0 +/- 4.3 毫米处。在 65 次总接触中,有 40 次(62%)发生在关节盂表面的后上象限。中立位外展 0 度时,关节接触位置的变化最大;然而,在这个位置,关节盂表面的前上象限没有接触。
全肩关节置换术后,盂肱关节的体内接触并不集中在关节盂表面,这表明肩关节置换术后的运动学可能并不像传统认为的那样受球窝力学的控制。尽管患者之间的接触位置随手臂位置的变化而变化,但在测试的肩部位置中,后上象限似乎经历了最多的关节接触。