Taraban Roman
Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA.
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Aug;40(3):639-46. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.639.
Many of the limitations to human learning and processing identified by cognitive psychologists over the last 50 years still hold true, including computational constraints, low learning rates, and unreliable processing. Instructional technology can be used in classrooms and in other learning contexts to address these limitations to learning. However, creating technological innovations is not enough. As part of psychological science, the development and assessment of instructional systems should be guided by theories and practices within the discipline. The technology we develop should become an object of research like other phenomena that are studied. In the present article, I present an informal account of my own work in assessing instructional technology for engineering thermodynamics to show not only the benefits, but also the limitations, in studying the technology we create. I conclude by considering several ways of advancing the development of instructional technology within the SCiP community, including interdisciplinary research and envisioning learning contexts that differ radically from traditional learning focused on lectures and testing.
在过去50年里,认知心理学家所确定的人类学习与处理过程中的诸多限制如今依然存在,包括计算限制、低学习率以及不可靠的处理过程。教学技术可用于课堂及其他学习环境中,以解决这些学习限制。然而,仅仅创造技术创新是不够的。作为心理科学的一部分,教学系统的开发与评估应遵循该学科的理论与实践。我们所开发的技术应成为像其他被研究现象一样的研究对象。在本文中,我将对自己评估工程热力学教学技术的工作做一个非正式的阐述,以展示研究我们所创造的技术不仅有好处,也存在局限性。最后,我将探讨在科学促进教学(SCiP)社区内推进教学技术发展的几种方式,包括跨学科研究以及设想与专注于讲座和测试的传统学习截然不同的学习环境。