Suppr超能文献

三氧化矿物凝聚体的改性。物理和力学性能。

Modification of mineral trioxide aggregate. Physical and mechanical properties.

作者信息

Camilleri J

机构信息

Department of Building and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Malta, Malta.

出版信息

Int Endod J. 2008 Oct;41(10):843-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01435.x. Epub 2008 Aug 11.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the physical and mechanical properties of two cements with a similar chemical composition to mineral trioxide aggregate and to attempt to improve their properties by producing a composite material.

METHODOLOGY

Two cement types were used: a mixture of calcium sulpho-aluminate cement and Portland cement (CSA) and calcium fluoro-aluminate cement (CFA) in conjunction with an admixture to improve the handling characteristics. Cements were mixed with an inert filler to produce cement composite. The setting time of the cements was evaluated using an indentation technique. The flexural and uni-axial compressive strengths and solubility of the cements and cement composites were evaluated. The properties of the materials were compared with proprietary brand glass-ionomer cement.

RESULTS

The setting time of the CSA and CFA cements was less than 6 min. The use of an admixture to improve the handling properties tended to retard setting. CSA was stronger then CFA in both compression and flexure (P < 0.001). Addition of granite increased the flexural strength of both cements but reduced the compressive strength (P < 0.01). CFA absorbed more water then CSA. Addition of granite reduced the water uptake of both cements.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CSA and CFA cements had adequate setting times and compressive strength values when compared with proprietary brand glass-ionomer cement. CSA was superior to CFA and had more promise as a prospective dental material.

摘要

目的

评估两种化学成分与三氧化物矿物聚合体相似的水泥的物理和机械性能,并尝试通过制备复合材料来改善其性能。

方法

使用了两种水泥类型:硫铝酸钙水泥和波特兰水泥的混合物(CSA)以及氟铝酸钙水泥(CFA),并添加了一种外加剂以改善操作性能。将水泥与惰性填料混合以制备水泥复合材料。使用压痕技术评估水泥的凝结时间。评估了水泥及水泥复合材料的抗折强度、单轴抗压强度和溶解性。将材料的性能与市售品牌玻璃离子水门汀进行比较。

结果

CSA和CFA水泥的凝结时间均小于6分钟。使用外加剂改善操作性能往往会延缓凝结。CSA在抗压和抗折方面均比CFA更强(P < 0.001)。添加花岗岩提高了两种水泥的抗折强度,但降低了抗压强度(P < 0.01)。CFA比CSA吸收更多的水。添加花岗岩降低了两种水泥的吸水率。

结论

与市售品牌玻璃离子水门汀相比,CSA和CFA水泥均具有足够的凝结时间和抗压强度值。CSA优于CFA,作为一种潜在的牙科材料更具前景。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验