Ha William Nguyen, Nicholson Timothy, Kahler Bill, Walsh Laurence James
School of Dentistry, University of QueenslandHerstonQueenslandAustralia.
School of Chemical Engineering, University of QueenslandSt. LuciaQueenslandAustralia.
Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 2016 Jan 26;2(1):25-30. doi: 10.3109/23337931.2015.1135746. eCollection 2016 Dec.
The current standard used to measure setting time for Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) involves indentation testing with arbitrary weights. This study compared indentation testing against rheological measurements and assessed the influences of particle size and the inclusion of bismuth oxide on the setting time of experimental MTA and Portland cement (PC). Two PCs (P1 and P2) of different particle sizes were produced using the same clinker. From these two PCs, two experimental MTAs (M1 and M2) were created with the addition of bismuth oxide. Particle size distributions were assessed using laser diffraction analysis. Indentation setting time tests were performed in accordance to the Gillmore needle test. Elastic modulus was assessed using a strain-controlled rheometer at 1 rad s and an applied strain of 0.01%. P1, P2, M1 and M2 cements had median particle sizes of 6.1, 12.5, 6.5 and 13.0 μm, respectively. Using indentation testing, final setting times were ranked P1 < M1 < P2 < M2. The ranking of the final setting time corresponded with the rheological assessment of time required to reach 95% of the elastic modulus plateau. The time to reach 95% elastic modulus plateau of 9.3 min corresponds to a time close to the point where the material can be overlaid with another restorative material to give a final restoration. The 95% plateau value for elastic modulus may be a more useful parameter for determining how the setting reaction of PC and MTA cements progress over time.
目前用于测量三氧化物矿物聚合体(MTA)凝固时间的标准涉及使用任意重量进行压痕测试。本研究将压痕测试与流变学测量进行了比较,并评估了粒径和氧化铋的加入对实验性MTA和波特兰水泥(PC)凝固时间的影响。使用相同的熟料制备了两种不同粒径的PC(P1和P2)。从这两种PC中,通过添加氧化铋制备了两种实验性MTA(M1和M2)。使用激光衍射分析评估粒径分布。根据吉尔摩针试验进行压痕凝固时间测试。使用应变控制流变仪在1 rad s和0.01%的施加应变下评估弹性模量。P1、P2、M1和M2水泥的中位粒径分别为6.1、12.5、6.5和13.0μm。使用压痕测试,最终凝固时间的排序为P1 < M1 < P2 < M2。最终凝固时间的排序与达到弹性模量平台95%所需时间的流变学评估相对应。达到95%弹性模量平台的时间为9.3分钟,这与材料可以被另一种修复材料覆盖以进行最终修复的时间点相近。弹性模量的95%平台值可能是一个更有用的参数,用于确定PC和MTA水泥的凝固反应随时间的进展情况。