Jorkjend Lars, Bergenholtz Axel, Johansson Ann-Katrin, Johansson Anders
Section of Dental Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, University of Oslo, Norway.
Swed Dent J. 2008;32(2):49-56.
The aim of this study was to analyze resting whole saliva (RWS) and stimulated whole saliva (SWS) flow rates before and after administration of Pilocarpine in secondary Sjögren's Syndrome patients. Fifty-one patients (49 women, 2 men, mean age 61 years, range 38-85), all with a resting saliva < or =0.1 ml/min, participated. Volumes of RWS and SWS collected over periods of 15 and 5 min, respectively, using standardized protocols were measured and the same procedure was repeated after oral administration of Pilocarpine (0.7 mg per 10 kg body weight). The sample was then divided into two groups, according to those in whom Pilocarpine stimulation had caused RWS flow to reach >0.1 ml/min (responders) and those who remained at values < or =0.1 ml/min (non-responders). All participants completed a questionnaire related to general and oral health status, as well as their subjective intraoral complaints before and after administration of Pilocarpine. Thirteen patients (25%) were classified as non-responders and the remaining 38 (75%) as responders. No statistically significant differences between the non-responders and responders were detected as regards general health parameters or intake of medicines with anticholinergic affect. As regards intraoral subjective complaints, no difference between the groups was found before Pilocarpine administration. After administration of Pilocarpine, complaints were significantly fewer among the responders (p<0.01). Both groups exhibited a significant decrease of intraoral symptoms after administration of Pilocarpine (responders P<0.001 and non-responders P<0.05) compared to baseline. For the whole group, more severe intraoral complaints were significantly associated with a lower SWS (P<0.05), but not a RWS, rate at baseline. It is concluded that a subgroup of Sjögren patients do not respond to Pilocarpine stimulation. The clinical implications of this finding need further investigation.
本研究旨在分析毛果芸香碱给药前后继发性干燥综合征患者的静息全唾液(RWS)和刺激全唾液(SWS)流速。51名患者(49名女性,2名男性,平均年龄61岁,范围38 - 85岁)参与研究,所有患者静息唾液量均≤0.1 ml/分钟。分别采用标准化方案在15分钟和5分钟内收集RWS和SWS的量,并在口服毛果芸香碱(每10千克体重0.7毫克)后重复相同程序。然后根据毛果芸香碱刺激后RWS流速达到>0.1 ml/分钟的患者(反应者)和仍≤0.1 ml/分钟的患者(无反应者)将样本分为两组。所有参与者在毛果芸香碱给药前后均完成了一份与总体和口腔健康状况以及主观口腔不适相关的问卷。13名患者(25%)被归类为无反应者,其余38名(75%)为反应者。在总体健康参数或具有抗胆碱能作用药物的摄入量方面,未发现无反应者和反应者之间存在统计学显著差异。关于口腔主观不适,在毛果芸香碱给药前两组之间未发现差异。给药后,反应者的不适明显减少(p<0.01)。与基线相比,两组在毛果芸香碱给药后口腔症状均显著减轻(反应者P<0.001,无反应者P<0.05)。对于整个组,更严重的口腔不适与基线时较低的SWS流速(P<0.05)显著相关,但与RWS流速无关。结论是一部分干燥综合征患者对毛果芸香碱刺激无反应。这一发现的临床意义需要进一步研究。