Van Henricus L, Dekker Jack, Peen Jaap, van Aalst Gerda, Schoevers Robert A
Depression Research Group, Mentrum Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychother Psychosom. 2008;77(6):358-64. doi: 10.1159/000151389. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
Although complete nonresponse in depression treatment is considered to be a major problem in clinical practice, research in this area is very limited. The objective of this preliminary study was to determine the frequency and predictors of complete nonresponse in different treatments for depression.
Post hoc analysis of the pooled data of 3 consecutive randomized controlled trials of outpatient depression treatment was conducted. The subjects were 313 patients with major depressive disorder and 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) scores between 14 and 25 who were treated for 6 months with either pharmacotherapy, short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy or combined therapy. Complete nonresponse was defined as a <25% response according to the HAM-D-17. Sociodemographic factors, depression features and adherence were investigated as predictors in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis.
Overall, nonresponse occurred in 34% of the patients. In pharmacotherapy this was 46%, in psychotherapy 39% and in combined therapy 28%. The severity of somatic symptoms was associated with nonresponse in both combined therapy and psychotherapy. No predictive factors were found in the case of pharmacotherapy. In psychotherapy, nonresponse was related to age above 40 years, chronic depression and nonadherence by the patient. In the case of combined therapy, younger age, previous use of an antidepressant and having a previous depressive episode were associated with nonresponse.
Easily measurable patient characteristics may help to identify patients at risk of complete nonresponse to treatment. It is suggested that predictors may differ across treatment modalities. However, head-to-head comparisons are required before it can be recommended to take this into account when selecting the most appropriate treatment for individual depressed patients.
尽管在临床实践中,抑郁症治疗中的完全无反应被视为一个主要问题,但该领域的研究非常有限。这项初步研究的目的是确定抑郁症不同治疗方法中完全无反应的频率和预测因素。
对3项连续的门诊抑郁症治疗随机对照试验的汇总数据进行事后分析。研究对象为313例重度抑郁症患者,汉密尔顿抑郁量表17项版本(HAM-D-17)得分在14至25分之间,接受药物治疗、短期心理动力支持性心理治疗或联合治疗6个月。根据HAM-D-17,完全无反应被定义为反应率<25%。在多变量逐步逻辑回归分析中,调查社会人口学因素、抑郁特征和依从性作为预测因素。
总体而言,34%的患者无反应。药物治疗中为46%,心理治疗中为39%,联合治疗中为28%。躯体症状的严重程度与联合治疗和心理治疗中的无反应均相关。药物治疗未发现预测因素。心理治疗中,无反应与40岁以上年龄、慢性抑郁症和患者不依从有关。联合治疗中,年龄较小、既往使用过抗抑郁药和既往有抑郁发作与无反应相关。
易于测量的患者特征可能有助于识别有治疗完全无反应风险的患者。建议不同治疗方式的预测因素可能不同。然而,在推荐为个体抑郁症患者选择最合适的治疗方法时考虑这一点之前,需要进行直接比较。