Hoffmann Carsten, Ziegler Nicole, Reiner Susanne, Krasel Cornelius, Lohse Martin J
Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Versbacher Strasse 9, D-97078 Wuerzburg, Germany.
J Biol Chem. 2008 Nov 7;283(45):30933-41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801472200. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
Interaction of G-protein-coupled receptors with beta-arrestins is an important step in receptor desensitization and in triggering "alternative" signals. By means of confocal microscopy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we have investigated the internalization of the human P2Y receptors 1, 2, 4, 6, 11, and 12 and their interaction with beta-arrestin-1 and -2. Co-transfection of each individual P2Y receptor with beta-arrestin-1-GFP or beta-arrestin-2-YFP into HEK-293 cells and stimulation with the corresponding agonists resulted in a receptor-specific interaction pattern. The P2Y(1) receptor stimulated with ADP strongly translocated beta-arrestin-2-YFP, whereas only a slight translocation was observed for beta-arrestin-1-GFP. The P2Y(4) receptor exhibited equally strong translocation for beta-arrestin-1-GFP and beta-arrestin-2-YFP when stimulated with UTP. The P2Y(6), P2Y(11), and P2Y(12) receptor internalized only when GRK2 was additionally co-transfected, but beta-arrestin translocation was only visible for the P2Y(6) and P2Y(11) receptor. The P2Y(2) receptor showed a beta-arrestin translocation pattern that was dependent on the agonist used for stimulation. UTP translocated beta-arrestin-1-GFP and beta-arrestin-2-YFP equally well, whereas ATP translocated beta-arrestin-1-GFP to a much lower extent than beta-arrestin-2-YFP. The same agonist-dependent pattern was seen in fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments between the fluorescently labeled P2Y(2) receptor and beta-arrestins. Thus, the P2Y(2) receptor would be classified as a class A receptor when stimulated with ATP or as a class B receptor when stimulated with UTP. The ligand-specific recruitment of beta-arrestins by ATP and UTP stimulation of P2Y(2) receptors was further found to result in differential stimulation of ERK phosphorylation. This suggests that the two different agonists induce distinct active states of this receptor that show differential interactions with beta-arrestins.
G蛋白偶联受体与β-抑制蛋白的相互作用是受体脱敏及触发“替代性”信号的重要步骤。借助共聚焦显微镜和荧光共振能量转移技术,我们研究了人P2Y受体1、2、4、6、11和12的内化过程及其与β-抑制蛋白-1和-2的相互作用。将每个单独的P2Y受体与β-抑制蛋白-1-GFP或β-抑制蛋白-2-YFP共转染至HEK-293细胞中,并用相应激动剂刺激,结果产生了受体特异性的相互作用模式。用ADP刺激P2Y(1)受体时,β-抑制蛋白-2-YFP发生强烈转位,而β-抑制蛋白-1-GFP仅出现轻微转位。用UTP刺激P2Y(4)受体时,β-抑制蛋白-1-GFP和β-抑制蛋白-2-YFP表现出同样强烈的转位。P2Y(6)、P2Y(11)和P2Y(12)受体仅在额外共转染GRK2时才发生内化,但β-抑制蛋白转位仅在P2Y(6)和P2Y(11)受体中可见。P2Y(2)受体呈现出一种依赖于用于刺激的激动剂的β-抑制蛋白转位模式。UTP能使β-抑制蛋白-1-GFP和β-抑制蛋白-2-YFP同等程度地转位,而ATP使β-抑制蛋白-1-GFP转位的程度远低于β-抑制蛋白-2-YFP。在荧光标记的P2Y(2)受体与β-抑制蛋白之间的荧光共振能量转移实验中也观察到了相同的激动剂依赖性模式。因此,当用ATP刺激时,P2Y(2)受体可归类为A类受体;而用UTP刺激时,则归类为B类受体。进一步发现,ATP和UTP刺激P2Y(2)受体对β-抑制蛋白的配体特异性募集会导致ERK磷酸化的差异刺激。这表明这两种不同的激动剂诱导该受体产生不同的活性状态,这些活性状态与β-抑制蛋白表现出不同的相互作用。