Suppr超能文献

23G与20G玻璃体切割系统用于扁平部玻璃体切除术的前瞻性随机临床试验

23-Gauge versus 20-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

作者信息

Wimpissinger B, Kellner L, Brannath W, Krepler K, Stolba U, Mihalics C, Binder S

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Rudolph Foundation Clinic, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;92(11):1483-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.140509. Epub 2008 Aug 14.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the sutureless 23-gauge system with a standard 20-gauge system in pars plana vitrectomy.

METHODS

60 patients in two randomised groups were included in this prospective clinical trial. Pars plana vitrectomy with either 23- or 20-gauge instruments was performed. The main outcome measures were postoperative conjunctival injection and pain. Secondary outcome parameters were time of surgery, intraocular pressure, visual acuity and complications.

RESULTS

Conjunctival injection (p = 0.0003) and postoperative pain (p = 0.01) were significantly reduced following 23-gauge vitrectomy compared with the 20-gauge procedure. Opening (p = 0.006) and closure times (p<0.00001) were significantly shorter, and vitrectomy time (p = 0.001) significantly longer in the 23-gauge system compared with 20-gauge vitrectomy. However, retinal manipulation and overall surgery times did not differ significantly between both groups. The same applies for eye pressure, distance and reading acuity. Regarding complications, two choroidal haemorrhages and one flat serous choroidal detachment occurred in the 23-gauge group.

CONCLUSION

The 23-gauge system for pars plana vitrectomy offers significantly higher patient comfort during the early postoperative period. Time of surgery is almost equal--a shorter time for wound closure is neutralised by a longer vitrectomy time in the 23-gauge group.

摘要

目的

比较23G无缝合系统与标准20G系统在玻璃体切割术中的应用。

方法

本前瞻性临床试验纳入了60例随机分组的患者。分别使用23G或20G器械进行玻璃体切割术。主要观察指标为术后结膜充血和疼痛。次要观察指标为手术时间、眼压、视力及并发症。

结果

与20G手术相比,23G玻璃体切割术后结膜充血(p = 0.0003)和术后疼痛(p = 0.01)明显减轻。与20G玻璃体切割术相比,23G系统的打开时间(p = 0.006)和关闭时间(p<0.00001)明显缩短,而玻璃体切割时间(p = 0.001)明显延长。然而,两组间视网膜操作时间和总手术时间无显著差异。眼压、远视力和近视力情况亦是如此。在并发症方面,23G组发生了2例脉络膜出血和1例扁平浆液性脉络膜脱离。

结论

23G玻璃体切割系统在术后早期能显著提高患者舒适度。手术时间基本相同——23G组伤口关闭时间较短,但玻璃体切割时间较长,二者相互抵消。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验