• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左顺行可控灌肠术(LACE):文献综述

Left Antegrade Continent Enema (LACE): review of the literature.

作者信息

Sinha C K, Butler C, Haddad M

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Surgery, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Aug;18(4):215-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038499. Epub 2008 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1038499
PMID:18704885
Abstract

PURPOSE

LACE is gradually becoming more established for the treatment of constipation. The purpose of this study was to review the current status of LACE procedure in paediatric practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic database search was performed. Patients who underwent a LACE procedure between 2002 and May 2007 were reviewed retrospectively. The data was analysed with respect to indications for operation, operative techniques, outcome, and complications. The outcomes were compared with those of right-sided antegrade colonic enema (RACE) procedures, published in the same period.

RESULTS

Nine studies describing 93 patients were identified. The underlying diagnoses were spina bifida (70 %), anorectal malformation (10 %), idiopathic constipation (10 %), Hirschsprung's disease (4 %) and other (6 %). The mean age at operation was 10 years. The various operative procedures used included retubularisation of the sigmoid colon (31 %), retubularisation of the splenic flexure (28 %), left Monti from the descending colon (15 %), and retubularisation of the ileum (3 %). Minimally invasive techniques were used in 23 % of cases. Mean volume of enema used was 414 ml. The mean transit time for enema was 31 minutes. Social continence was achieved in 94 % (complete in 72 %; partial in 22 %) cases. Stomal stenosis was seen in 14 % of cases, of which 9 % required revision of the stoma and 5 % responded to dilatation. Sixteen studies describing 583 patients were found for RACE. Indications for operation were similar to those for LACE. Open procedures were done in 86 % of cases, and laparoscopic assisted procedures in 14 % of cases. Mean age at operation was 10 years. Mean volume of enema used 618 ml. Median evacuation time was 53 minutes. Continence was achieved in 94 % of cases. Stomal stenosis occurred in 26 %.

CONCLUSION

The results of LACE procedures are encouraging, especially in light of the lower amount of enema fluid required, the quicker enema transit time and fewer complications. Overall outcome (continence) is comparable to that of RACE.

摘要

目的

经阑尾腔行顺行结肠灌肠法(LACE)在便秘治疗中的应用正逐渐增多。本研究旨在回顾LACE手术在儿科实践中的现状。

材料与方法

进行系统的数据库检索。对2002年至2007年5月期间接受LACE手术的患者进行回顾性研究。分析手术适应证、手术技术、疗效及并发症等数据。将结果与同期发表的右侧顺行结肠灌肠法(RACE)手术的结果进行比较。

结果

共确定9项研究,涉及93例患者。基础诊断包括脊柱裂(70%)、肛门直肠畸形(10%)、特发性便秘(10%)、先天性巨结肠(4%)及其他(6%)。手术平均年龄为10岁。采用的各种手术方法包括乙状结肠再管化(31%)、脾曲再管化(28%)、降结肠左Monti术(15%)及回肠再管化(3%)。23%的病例采用了微创技术。灌肠平均用量为414毫升。灌肠平均通过时间为31分钟。94%的病例实现了社会控便(72%完全控便;22%部分控便)。14%的病例出现造口狭窄,其中9%需要造口修复,5%经扩张治疗有效。共找到16项描述583例患者的RACE研究。手术适应证与LACE相似。86%的病例采用开放手术,14%的病例采用腹腔镜辅助手术。手术平均年龄为10岁。灌肠平均用量为618毫升。中位排空时间为53分钟。94%的病例实现了控便。26%的病例出现造口狭窄。

结论

LACE手术的结果令人鼓舞,尤其是考虑到所需灌肠液量较少、灌肠通过时间较短且并发症较少。总体疗效(控便)与RACE相当。

相似文献

1
Left Antegrade Continent Enema (LACE): review of the literature.左顺行可控灌肠术(LACE):文献综述
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Aug;18(4):215-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038499. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
2
Left colonic antegrade continence enema: experience gained from 19 cases.左半结肠顺行性节制灌肠术:19例经验总结
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Oct;41(10):1750-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.048.
3
Intermediate-term outcome of the simplified laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedure: less is better.简化腹腔镜顺行性节制灌肠术的中期结果:越少越好。
J Urol. 2008 Jan;179(1):299-303. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.161. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
4
The Malone antegrade continence enema: single institutional review.马龙顺行性节制灌肠术:单机构回顾
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1106-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.062. Epub 2008 Jul 18.
5
After the honeymoon--medium-term outcome of antegrade continence enema procedure.蜜月期过后——顺行性可控灌肠术的中期结果。
J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Jan;38(1):65-8; discussion 65-8. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50012.
6
Is the outcome of the left colon antegrade continence enema better than that of the right colon antegrade continence enema?左半结肠顺行性节制灌肠的效果是否优于右半结肠顺行性节制灌肠?
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Apr;44(4):783-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.08.034.
7
The colon flap/extension Malone antegrade continence enema: an alternative to the Monti-Malone antegrade continence enema.结肠瓣/延长马龙顺行性节制灌肠术:蒙蒂-马龙顺行性节制灌肠术的替代方法。
J Urol. 2005 Jul;174(1):299-302. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161215.67278.99.
8
The Macedo-Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: early experience.马塞多-马龙顺行性可控灌肠术:早期经验
J Urol. 2005 Apr;173(4):1340-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000149678.36915.fe.
9
Long-term results of antegrade colonic enema in adult patients: assessment of functional results.成人患者顺行结肠灌肠的长期结果:功能结果评估
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Oct;51(10):1523-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9401-6. Epub 2008 Jul 12.
10
Antegrade continence enema for the treatment of fecal incontinence in adults: use of gastric tube for catheterizable access to the descending colon.顺行性可控灌肠治疗成人大便失禁:使用胃管建立可插管进入降结肠的通道。
J Urol. 1999 Jun;161(6):1813-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Usefulness of the Monti-Malone procedure as a reconstruction of the antegrade continence enema procedure: a case report.蒙蒂-马龙手术作为顺行可控灌肠术重建方法的效用:病例报告
Surg Case Rep. 2021 May 6;7(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s40792-021-01197-5.
2
Surgical Management of Idiopathic Constipation in Pediatric Patients.小儿特发性便秘的外科治疗
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2018 Mar;31(2):89-98. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1609023. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
3
Percutaneous endoscopic sigmoid colostomy for irrigation in the management of bowel dysfunction of adults with central neurologic disease.
经皮内镜乙状结肠造口术在成人中枢神经系统疾病所致肠功能障碍管理中的应用:灌洗治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3253-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1701-6. Epub 2011 Jun 3.