Vander Wall Stephen B
Department of Biology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA.
Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):1837-49. doi: 10.1890/07-0409.1.
Selective pressures that influence the form of seed dispersal syndromes are poorly understood. Morphology of plant propagules is often used to infer the means of dispersal, but morphology can be misleading. Several species of pines, for example, have winged seeds adapted for wind dispersal but owe much of their establishment to scatter-hoarding animals. Here the relative importance of wind vs. animal dispersal is assessed for four species of pines of the eastern Sierra Nevada that have winged seeds but differed in seed size: lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta murrayana, 8 mg); ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa ponderosa, 56 mg); Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi, 160 mg); and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana, 231 mg). Pre-dispersal seed mortality eliminated much of the ponderosa pine seed crop (66%), but had much less effect on Jeffrey pine (32% of seeds destroyed), lodgepole pine (29%), and sugar pine (7%). When cones opened most filled seeds were dispersed by wind. Animals removed > 99% of wind-dispersed Jeffrey and sugar pine seeds from the ground within 60 days, but animals gathered only 93% of lodgepole pine seeds and 38% of ponderosa pine seeds during the same period. Animals gathered and scatter hoarded radioactively labeled ponderosa, Jeffrey, and sugar pine seeds, making a total of 2103 caches over three years of study. Only three lodgepole pine caches were found. Caches typically contained 1-4 seeds buried 5-20 mm deep, depths suitable for seedling emergence. Although Jeffrey and sugar pine seeds are initially wind dispersed, nearly all seedlings arise from animal caches. Lodgepole pine is almost exclusively wind dispersed, with animals acting as seed predators. Animals treated ponderosa pine in an intermediate fashion. Two-phased dispersal of large, winged pine seeds appears adaptive; initial wind dispersal helps to minimize pre-dispersal seed mortality whereas scatter hoarding by animals places seeds in sites with a higher probability of seedling establishment.
影响种子传播综合征形式的选择压力目前还知之甚少。植物繁殖体的形态通常被用来推断传播方式,但形态可能会产生误导。例如,几种松树的种子带有翅膀,适合风力传播,但它们的大量定居却要归功于分散贮藏种子的动物。在此,对内华达山脉东部四种种子带有翅膀但种子大小不同的松树进行了风力传播与动物传播相对重要性的评估:黑松(扭叶松穆雷亚种,8毫克);黄松(西黄松指名亚种,56毫克);杰弗里松(杰弗里松,160毫克);以及糖松(兰伯氏松,231毫克)。传播前种子死亡率消除了大部分黄松种子作物(66%),但对杰弗里松(32%的种子被破坏)、黑松(29%)和糖松(7%)的影响要小得多。当球果张开时,大多数饱满的种子通过风力传播。动物在60天内从地面上搬走了超过99%的通过风力传播的杰弗里松和糖松种子,但在同一时期,动物只收集了93%的黑松种子和38%的黄松种子。动物收集并分散贮藏了放射性标记的黄松、杰弗里松和糖松种子,在三年的研究中总共形成了2103个贮藏点。只发现了三个黑松贮藏点。贮藏点通常包含1 - 4粒种子,埋在地下5 - 20毫米深处,这样的深度适合幼苗出土。虽然杰弗里松和糖松种子最初是通过风力传播的,但几乎所有的幼苗都来自动物贮藏点。黑松几乎完全通过风力传播,动物则充当种子捕食者。动物对黄松的处理方式介于两者之间。大型带翅松籽的两阶段传播似乎具有适应性;最初的风力传播有助于将传播前种子死亡率降至最低,而动物的分散贮藏则将种子放置在幼苗建立概率更高的地方。