Suppr超能文献

卒中III期试验的介入管理方法

Methodology of the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial.

作者信息

Khatri Pooja, Hill Michael D, Palesch Yuko Y, Spilker Judith, Jauch Edward C, Carrozzella Janice A, Demchuk Andrew M, Martin Renee', Mauldin Patrick, Dillon Catherine, Ryckborst Karla J, Janis Scott, Tomsick Thomas A, Broderick Joseph P

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way ML 0525, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0525, USA.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2008 May;3(2):130-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2008.00151.x.

Abstract

RATIONALE

The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) I and II pilot trials demonstrated that the combined intravenous (i.v.) and intraarterial (i.a.) approach to recanalization may be more effective than standard i.v. rt-PA (Activase) alone for moderate-to-large National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS>or=10) strokes, and with a similar safety profile.

AIMS

The primary objective of this NIH-funded, Phase III, randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial is to determine whether a combined i.v./i.a. approach to recanalization is superior to standard i.v. rt-PA alone when initiated within 3 h of acute ischemic stroke onset. The IMS III trial will develop and maintain a network of interventional centers to test the safety, feasibility, and potential efficacy of new FDA-approved catheter devices as part of a combined i.v./i.a. approach to recanalization as the IMS III study progresses. A secondary objective of the IMS III trial is to determine the cost-effectiveness of the combined i.v./i.a. approach as compared with standard i.v. rt-PA. Trial enrollment began in July of 2006.

DESIGN

A projected 900 subjects with moderate-to-large (NIHSS>or=10) ischemic strokes between ages 18 and 80 will be enrolled over the next 5 years at 40-plus centers in the United States and Canada. Patients must have i.v. treatment initiated within 3 h of stroke onset in both arms. Subjects will be randomized in a 2 : 1 ratio with more subjects enrolled in the combined i.v./i.a. group. The i.v. rt-PA alone group will receive the standard full dose [0.9 mg/kg, 90 mg maximum (10% as bolus)] of rt-PA intravenously over an hour. The combined i.v./i.a. group will receive a lower dose of i.v. rt-PA ( approximately 0.6 mg/kg, 60 mg maximum) over 40 min, followed by immediate angiography. If a treatable thrombus is not demonstrated, no i.a. therapy will be administered. If an appropriate thrombus is identified, treatment will continue with either the Concentric Merci thrombus-removal device, infusion of rt-PA and delivery of low-intensity ultrasound at the site of the occlusion via the EKOS Micro-Infusion Catheter, or infusion of rt-PA via a standard microcatheter. If i.a. rt-Pa therapy is the chosen strategy, a maximum of 22 mg of i.a. rt-PA may be given. The choice of i.a. strategy will be made by the treating neurointerventionalist. The i.a. treatment must begin within 5 h and be completed within 7 h of stroke onset.

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary outcome measure is a favorable clinical outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale Score of 0-2 at 3 months. The primary safety measure is mortality at 3 months and symptomatic ICH within the 24 h of randomization.

摘要

理论依据

卒中的介入治疗(IMS)I期和II期试点试验表明,对于中度至重度(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分≥10分)的卒中,静脉内(i.v.)联合动脉内(i.a.)再通方法可能比单独使用标准静脉内重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA,商品名阿替普酶)更有效,且安全性相当。

目的

这项由美国国立卫生研究院资助的III期随机、多中心、开放标签临床试验的主要目的是确定在急性缺血性卒中发病3小时内开始治疗时,静脉内联合动脉内再通方法是否优于单独使用标准静脉内rt-PA。随着IMS III研究的推进,该试验将建立并维持一个介入中心网络,以测试美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的新型导管装置作为静脉内联合动脉内再通方法一部分的安全性、可行性和潜在疗效。IMS III试验的次要目的是确定静脉内联合动脉内方法与标准静脉内rt-PA相比的成本效益。试验于2006年7月开始招募受试者。

设计

预计在未来5年内,将在美国和加拿大的40多个中心招募900名年龄在18至80岁之间、患有中度至重度(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分≥10分)缺血性卒中的受试者。患者双臂均必须在卒中发病3小时内开始静脉治疗。受试者将按2:1的比例随机分组,更多受试者被纳入静脉内联合动脉内治疗组。单独静脉内rt-PA治疗组将在1小时内静脉注射标准全剂量[0.9mg/kg,最大90mg(10%作为静脉推注)]的rt-PA。静脉内联合动脉内治疗组将在40分钟内接受较低剂量的静脉内rt-PA(约0.6mg/kg,最大60mg),随后立即进行血管造影。如果未发现可治疗的血栓,则不进行动脉内治疗。如果识别出合适的血栓,治疗将继续使用同心Merci血栓清除装置、通过EKOS微输注导管在闭塞部位输注rt-PA并进行低强度超声治疗,或通过标准微导管输注rt-PA。如果选择动脉内rt-PA治疗策略,动脉内rt-PA最大剂量可为22mg。动脉内治疗策略的选择将由治疗神经介入专家决定。动脉内治疗必须在卒中发病5小时内开始,并在7小时内完成。

研究结果

主要结局指标是良好的临床结局,定义为3个月时改良Rankin量表评分为0-2分。主要安全指标是3个月时的死亡率和随机分组后24小时内的症状性颅内出血。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b440/3057361/f817eda283ac/nihms274434f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Methodology of the Interventional Management of Stroke III Trial.卒中III期试验的介入管理方法
Int J Stroke. 2008 May;3(2):130-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2008.00151.x.
2
The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) II Study.卒中的介入治疗(IMS)II研究
Stroke. 2007 Jul;38(7):2127-35. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.483131. Epub 2007 May 24.

引用本文的文献

10
Neuroprotectants in the Era of Reperfusion Therapy.再灌注治疗时代的神经保护剂
J Stroke. 2018 May;20(2):197-207. doi: 10.5853/jos.2017.02901. Epub 2018 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Intracranial hemorrhage associated with revascularization therapies.与血管重建治疗相关的颅内出血
Stroke. 2007 Feb;38(2):431-40. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000254524.23708.c9. Epub 2007 Jan 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验