• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

85岁以上急性冠脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉支架置入术的长期预后:裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架的比较

Long-term outcome of patients of over 85 years old with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting: a comparison of bare metal stent and drug eluting stent.

作者信息

Ma Han-ying, Zhou Yu-jie, Dick Ronald J, Shi Dong-mei, Liu Yu-yang, Cheng Wan-jun, Guo Yong-he, Wang Jian-long, Ge Hai-long

机构信息

12th Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 May 20;121(10):887-91.

PMID:18706201
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients aged over 85 years have been under-represented in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) trials despite an increase in referrals for PCI. The long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary stenting in patients aged over 85 years with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain unclear. Moreover it is unknown whether there are differences between bare metal stent (BMS) and drug eluting stent (DES) in this special population.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients with ACS aged over 85 years undergoing stenting (BMS group n = 21 vs DES group n = 59) were retrospectively studied. In-hospital, one year and overall clinical follow-up (12 - 36 months) of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including cardiac deaths, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) as well as stroke and other major bleeding were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, the procedure success rate was 93.8% with TIMI-3 coronary flow post-PCI in 93.8% of the vessels and the procedure related complication was 17.5%. The incidence of in-hospital MACEs in BMS group was higher (14.3% vs 6.8%, P = 0.30). The 1-year incidence of MACEs in DES group was 7.0% while there was no MACE in the BMS group. Clinical follow-up for 12 - 36 months showed that the overall survival free from MACE was 82.9% and the incidence of MACE in the BMS group was lower (5.3% vs 21.1%, P = 0.20). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the creatinine level (OR: 1.013; 95% CI: 1.006 - 1.020; P = 0.004) and hypertension (OR: 3.201; 95% CI: 1.000 - 10.663; P = 0.04) are two major factors affecting the long-term MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous coronary stenting in patients aged over 85 years is safe and provides good short and long-term efficacy. Patients with renal dysfunction and hypertension may have a relatively high incidence of MACE.

摘要

背景

尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)转诊人数有所增加,但85岁以上患者在PCI试验中的代表性不足。85岁以上急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉支架置入术的长期安全性和有效性仍不明确。此外,在这一特殊人群中,裸金属支架(BMS)和药物洗脱支架(DES)之间是否存在差异尚不清楚。

方法

对80例年龄超过85岁的ACS患者进行支架置入术(BMS组n = 21,DES组n = 59)进行回顾性研究。比较两组患者住院期间、1年及总体临床随访(12 - 36个月)的主要不良心脏事件(MACE),包括心源性死亡、心肌梗死、靶病变血运重建(TLR)和靶血管血运重建(TVR)以及中风和其他大出血情况。

结果

在整个队列中,手术成功率为93.8%,PCI术后93.8%的血管TIMI-3级冠状动脉血流,手术相关并发症发生率为17.5%。BMS组住院期间MACE发生率较高(14.3%对6.8%,P = 0.30)。DES组1年MACE发生率为7.0%,而BMS组无MACE发生。12 - 36个月的临床随访显示,无MACE的总体生存率为82.9%,BMS组MACE发生率较低(5.3%对21.1%,P = 0.20)。多因素回归分析显示,肌酐水平(OR:1.013;95%CI:1.006 - 1.020;P = 0.004)和高血压(OR:3.201;95%CI:1.000 - 10.663;P = 0.04)是影响长期MACE的两个主要因素。

结论

85岁以上患者经皮冠状动脉支架置入术安全,具有良好的短期和长期疗效。肾功能不全和高血压患者MACE发生率可能相对较高。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome of patients of over 85 years old with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting: a comparison of bare metal stent and drug eluting stent.85岁以上急性冠脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉支架置入术的长期预后:裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架的比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 May 20;121(10):887-91.
2
Long-term efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with multiple coronary chronic total occlusions.药物洗脱支架置入治疗多支冠状动脉慢性完全闭塞病变的长期疗效及安全性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Apr 5;123(7):789-93.
3
Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation in patients with chronic total coronary artery occlusions.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架植入治疗慢性完全性冠状动脉闭塞患者的长期预后
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Mar 20;122(6):643-7.
4
Lack of clinical long-term benefit with the use of a drug eluting stent compared to use of a bare metal stent in saphenous vein grafts.与在隐静脉移植物中使用裸金属支架相比,使用药物洗脱支架缺乏临床长期益处。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jul 1;72(1):13-20. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21599.
5
Long-term clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for treatment of restenosis within bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架内再狭窄后的长期临床结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):594-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21399.
6
Long-term outcome after drug eluting stenting in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: data from the REAL registry.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者药物洗脱支架置入术后的长期预后:REAL 注册研究数据。
Int J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;140(2):154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.11.021. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
7
Long term results of unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention with DES versus BMS.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期结果
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2009 Feb;57(1):1-6.
8
Impact of admission creatinine level on clinical outcomes of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation.入院时肌酐水平对接受药物洗脱支架植入的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Dec 5;121(23):2379-83.
9
Maintenance of long-term clinical benefit with sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction 3-year results of the SESAMI (sirolimus-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent in acute myocardial infarction) trial.在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,西罗莫司洗脱支架的长期临床获益维持:SESAMI(急性心肌梗死中西罗莫司洗脱支架与裸金属支架比较)试验 3 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):810-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.046.
10
Two-year clinical registry follow-up of endothelial progenitor cell capture stent versus sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent versus bare metal stents in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction.对接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,内皮祖细胞捕获支架与西罗莫司洗脱生物可吸收聚合物涂层支架及裸金属支架的两年临床注册随访。
J Interv Cardiol. 2010 Apr;23(2):101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00534.x. Epub 2010 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要心脑血管不良事件的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04896-4.
2
Comparison of coronary DES and BMS in octogenarians: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 80 岁以上老年人使用冠状动脉 DES 和 BMS 的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2013 Dec;10(4):336-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2013.04.004.
3
Outcome of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly and the very elderly: insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.
当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在老年人和极老年人中的结果:密歇根蓝十字蓝盾心血管联合会的见解。
Clin Cardiol. 2011 Sep;34(9):549-54. doi: 10.1002/clc.20926. Epub 2011 Jun 29.