Farnsworth K D, Focardi S, Beecham J A
Macaulay Institute, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK.
Am Nat. 2002 Jan;159(1):24-39. doi: 10.1086/324114.
We develop a new approach to modeling grazing systems that links foraging characteristics (intake and digestive constraints) with resource dynamics via the probability of encounter with different grass heights. Three complementary models are presented: the generation of a grass height structure through selective grazing; investigating the conditions for consumer coexistence; and, using a simplified resource structure, the consequences for consumer abundance. The main finding is that coexistence between grazers differing in body size is possible if a single-resource type becomes differentiated in its height structure. Large grazers can facilitate food availability for smaller species but with the latter being competitively dominant. The relative preference given to different resource partitions is important in determining the nature of population interactions. Large-body and small-body grazer populations can interact through competitive, parasitic, commensalist, or amensalist relationships, depending on the way they partition the resource as well as their relative populations and the dynamics of resource renewal. The models provide new concepts of multispecies carrying capacity (stock equilibrium) in grazed systems with implications for conservation and management. We conclude that consumer species are not substitutable; therefore, the use of rangeland management concepts such as "livestock units" may be inappropriate.
我们开发了一种新的放牧系统建模方法,该方法通过与不同草高相遇的概率,将觅食特征(摄入量和消化限制)与资源动态联系起来。提出了三个互补模型:通过选择性放牧生成草高结构;研究消费者共存的条件;以及使用简化的资源结构,研究对消费者数量的影响。主要发现是,如果单一资源类型在其高度结构上有所分化,那么体型不同的食草动物之间就有可能共存。大型食草动物可以为较小物种提供食物,但后者在竞争中占主导地位。对不同资源分区的相对偏好对于确定种群相互作用的性质很重要。大型和小型食草动物种群可以通过竞争、寄生、共生或偏害关系相互作用,这取决于它们划分资源的方式以及它们的相对数量和资源更新动态。这些模型为放牧系统中的多物种承载能力(种群平衡)提供了新的概念,对保护和管理具有启示意义。我们得出结论,消费者物种不可相互替代;因此,使用“牲畜单位”等牧场管理概念可能不合适。