• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体-面积关系最能解释湿地中鹅类物种的密度。

Individual-area relationship best explains goose species density in wetlands.

作者信息

Zhang Yong, Jia Qiang, Prins Herbert H T, Cao Lei, de Boer Willem Fred

机构信息

Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands; School of Life Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.

School of Life Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 May 21;10(5):e0124972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124972. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0124972
PMID:25996502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4440642/
Abstract

Explaining and predicting animal distributions is one of the fundamental objectives in ecology and conservation biology. Animal habitat selection can be regulated by top-down and bottom-up processes, and is mediated by species interactions. Species varying in body size respond differently to top-down and bottom-up determinants, and hence understanding these allometric responses to those determinants is important for conservation. In this study, using two differently sized goose species wintering in the Yangtze floodplain, we tested the predictions derived from three different hypotheses (individual-area relationship, food resource and disturbance hypothesis) to explain the spatial and temporal variation in densities of two goose species. Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique, we demonstrated that goose density was positive correlated with patch area size, suggesting that the individual area-relationship best predicts differences in goose densities. Moreover, the other predictions, related to food availability and disturbance, were not significant. Buffalo grazing probably facilitated greater white-fronted geese, as the number of buffalos was positively correlated to the density of this species. We concluded that patch area size is the most important factor determining the density of goose species in our study area. Patch area size is directly determined by water levels in the Yangtze floodplain, and hence modifying the hydrological regimes can enlarge the capacity of these wetlands for migratory birds.

摘要

解释和预测动物分布是生态学和保护生物学的基本目标之一。动物栖息地选择可受自上而下和自下而上过程的调控,并由物种间相互作用介导。体型各异的物种对自上而下和自下而上的决定因素反应不同,因此了解这些对这些决定因素的异速生长反应对于保护工作很重要。在本研究中,我们利用在长江洪泛区越冬的两种体型不同的鹅类,检验了源自三种不同假说(个体-面积关系、食物资源和干扰假说)的预测,以解释两种鹅类密度的时空变化。使用带有马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗技术的广义线性混合模型,我们证明鹅类密度与斑块面积大小呈正相关,这表明个体-面积关系最能预测鹅类密度的差异。此外,与食物可利用性和干扰相关的其他预测并不显著。水牛放牧可能有利于更多白额雁栖息,因为水牛数量与该物种的密度呈正相关。我们得出结论,斑块面积大小是决定我们研究区域内鹅类物种密度的最重要因素。斑块面积大小直接由长江洪泛区的水位决定,因此改变水文状况可以扩大这些湿地对候鸟的容纳能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d32/4440642/c31616e8691a/pone.0124972.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d32/4440642/c31616e8691a/pone.0124972.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d32/4440642/c31616e8691a/pone.0124972.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual-area relationship best explains goose species density in wetlands.个体-面积关系最能解释湿地中鹅类物种的密度。
PLoS One. 2015 May 21;10(5):e0124972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124972. eCollection 2015.
2
Shifts in distribution of herbivorous geese relative to hydrological variation in East Dongting Lake wetland, China.中国东洞庭湖湿地中草食性鹅类分布与水文变化的关系。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 15;636:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.247. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
3
Crucial sites and environmental variables for wintering migratory waterbird population distributions in the natural wetlands in East Dongting Lake, China.中国东洞庭湖自然湿地越冬水鸟种群分布的关键地点和环境变量。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 10;655:147-157. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.185. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
4
Are declining populations of wild geese in China 'prisoners' of their natural habitats?在中国,野生鹅类数量的减少是否是因为它们的自然栖息地变成了“牢笼”?
Curr Biol. 2017 May 22;27(10):R376-R377. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.037.
5
Reducing human pressure on farmland could rescue China's declining wintering geese.减轻人类对农田的压力有助于拯救中国数量日益减少的越冬鹅。
Mov Ecol. 2020 Aug 18;8:35. doi: 10.1186/s40462-020-00220-y. eCollection 2020.
6
[Waterbird habitat-selection during winter and spring in reclaimed coastal wetlands in Nanhui Dongtan, Shanghai].[上海南汇东滩围垦滨海湿地冬春季水鸟栖息地选择]
Dongwuxue Yanjiu. 2011 Dec;32(6):624-30. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2011.06624.
7
Seasonal dynamics of wintering waterbirds in two shallow lakes along Yangtze River in Anhui Province.安徽省长江沿线两个浅水湖泊越冬水鸟的季节动态
Dongwuxue Yanjiu. 2011 Oct;32(5):540-8. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1141.2011.05540.
8
Predator behaviour and predation risk in the heterogeneous Arctic environment.北极异质环境中的捕食者行为与捕食风险
J Anim Ecol. 2008 May;77(3):439-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01354.x. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
9
Effect of conservation efforts and ecological variables on waterbird population sizes in wetlands of the Yangtze River.保护措施和生态变量对长江湿地水鸟种群数量的影响。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 25;5:17136. doi: 10.1038/srep17136.
10
Hydrology-driven responses of herbivorous geese in relation to changes in food quantity and quality.水文驱动的食草鹅对食物数量和质量变化的响应。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Apr 20;10(12):5281-5292. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6272. eCollection 2020 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Protection of wetlands as a strategy for reducing the spread of avian influenza from migratory waterfowl.保护湿地作为减少候鸟传播禽流感策略。
Ambio. 2020 Apr;49(4):939-949. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01238-2. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
2
Effects of ecological and anthropogenic factors on waterbird abundance at a Ramsar Site in the Yangtze River Floodplain.生态和人为因素对长江流域湿地水鸟数量的影响。
Ambio. 2019 Mar;48(3):293-303. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1076-1. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
3
Experimental Evidence Shows the Importance of Behavioural Plasticity and Body Size under Competition in Waterfowl.

本文引用的文献

1
Trading forage quality for quantity? Plant phenology and patch choice by Svalbard reindeer.以草料质量换取数量?斯瓦尔巴德驯鹿的植物物候与觅食地选择
Oecologia. 2000 Apr;123(1):108-115. doi: 10.1007/s004420050995.
2
Evidence of territoriality and species interactions from spatial point-pattern analyses of subarctic-nesting geese.通过对亚北极地区筑巢鹅的空间点模式分析得出的领域性和物种相互作用的证据。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 2;8(12):e81029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081029. eCollection 2013.
3
Towards a solution to the goose-agriculture conflict in North Norway, 1988-2012: the interplay between policy, stakeholder influence and goose population dynamics.
实验证据表明行为可塑性和体型在水禽竞争中的重要性。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 11;11(10):e0164606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164606. eCollection 2016.
4
Effect of conservation efforts and ecological variables on waterbird population sizes in wetlands of the Yangtze River.保护措施和生态变量对长江湿地水鸟种群数量的影响。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 25;5:17136. doi: 10.1038/srep17136.
为了解决挪威北部的鹅与农业之间的冲突,1988-2012 年:政策、利益相关者影响和鹅种群动态之间的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 20;8(8):e71912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071912. eCollection 2013.
4
Response of neotropical bat assemblages to human land use.新热带蝙蝠类群对人类土地利用的响应。
Conserv Biol. 2013 Oct;27(5):1096-106. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12099. Epub 2013 Jul 21.
5
Comparing the community composition of European and eastern Chinese waterbirds and the influence of human factors on the China waterbird community.比较欧洲和中国东部水鸟的群落组成及人类因素对中国水鸟群落的影响。
Ambio. 2011 Feb;40(1):68-77. doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0088-2.
6
Increased searching and handling effort in tall swards lead to a Type IV functional response in small grazing herbivores.在高草丛中增加搜索和处理的努力会导致小型食草动物产生 IV 型功能反应。
Oecologia. 2011 Jul;166(3):659-69. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1894-8. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
7
Allometry and spatial scales of foraging in mammalian herbivores.哺乳动物食草动物的异速生长和觅食空间尺度。
Ecol Lett. 2010 Mar;13(3):311-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01423.x. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
8
Grassland-herbivore interactions: how do grazers coexist?草原-食草动物的相互作用:食草动物是如何共存的?
Am Nat. 2002 Jan;159(1):24-39. doi: 10.1086/324114.
9
Human impacts on regional avian diversity and abundance.人类对区域鸟类多样性和数量的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2008 Apr;22(2):405-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00881.x. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
10
Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle.食物和捕食对雪兔周期的影响。
Science. 1995 Aug 25;269(5227):1112-5. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5227.1112.