Rades Dirk, Kueter Jan-Dirk, Pluemer Andre, Veninga Theo, Schild Steven E
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar 15;73(4):1077-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.035. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
To compare the results of whole-brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery (WBRT+SRS) with those of surgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy and a boost to the metastatic site (OP+WBRT+boost) for patients with one or two brain metastases.
Survival, intracerebral control, and local control of the treated metastases were retrospectively evaluated. To reduce the risk of selection bias, a matched-pair analysis was performed. The outcomes of 47 patients who received WBRT+SRS were compared with those of a second cohort of 47 patients who recieved OP+WBRT+boost. The two treatment groups were matched for the following potential prognostic factors: WBRT schedule, age, gender, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extracerebral metastases, recursive partitioning analysis class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to WBRT.
The 1-year survival rates were 65% after WBRT+SRS and 63% after OP+WBRT+boost (p = 0.19). The 1-year intracerebral control rates were 70% and 78% (p = 0.39), respectively. The 1-year local control rates were 84% and 83% (p = 0.87), respectively. On multivariate analyses, improved survival was significantly associated with better performance status (p = 0.009), no extracerebral metastases (p = 0.004), recursive partitioning analysis Class 1 (p = 0.004), and interval from tumor diagnosis to WBRT (p = 0.001). Intracerebral control was not significantly associated with any of the potential prognostic factors. Improved local control was significantly associated with no extracerebral metastases (p = 0.037).
Treatment outcomes were not significantly different after WBRT+SRS compared with OP+WBRT+boost. However, WBRT+SRS is less invasive than OP+WBRT+boost and may be preferable for patients with one or two brain metastases. The results should be confirmed by randomized trials.
比较全脑放疗联合立体定向放射外科治疗(WBRT+SRS)与手术联合全脑放疗并对转移部位进行强化治疗(OP+WBRT+强化)用于治疗一或两个脑转移瘤患者的效果。
对治疗后转移瘤的生存率、脑内控制情况和局部控制情况进行回顾性评估。为降低选择偏倚风险,进行了配对分析。将47例接受WBRT+SRS治疗的患者与另一组47例接受OP+WBRT+强化治疗的患者的结果进行比较。两个治疗组在以下潜在预后因素上进行了匹配:WBRT方案、年龄、性别、体能状态、肿瘤类型、脑转移瘤数量、脑外转移瘤、递归分区分析类别以及从肿瘤诊断到WBRT的时间间隔。
WBRT+SRS治疗后1年生存率为65%,OP+WBRT+强化治疗后为63%(p = 0.19)。1年脑内控制率分别为70%和78%(p = 0.39)。1年局部控制率分别为84%和&3%(p = 0.87)。多因素分析显示,生存率提高与较好的体能状态(p = 0.009)、无脑外转移瘤(p = 0.004)、递归分区分析1类(p = 0.004)以及从肿瘤诊断到WBRT的时间间隔(p = 0.001)显著相关。脑内控制与任何潜在预后因素均无显著相关性。局部控制改善与无脑外转移瘤显著相关(p = 0.037)。
与OP+WBRT+强化相比,WBRT+SRS治疗后的结果无显著差异。然而,WBRT+SRS的侵入性低于OP+WBRT+强化,对于有一或两个脑转移瘤的患者可能更可取。结果应通过随机试验进行验证。