Suppr超能文献

一项配对分析,比较全脑放疗联合立体定向放射外科与手术联合全脑放疗并对一两个脑转移瘤的转移部位进行强化治疗的效果。

A matched-pair analysis comparing whole-brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery versus surgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy and a boost to the metastatic site for one or two brain metastases.

作者信息

Rades Dirk, Kueter Jan-Dirk, Pluemer Andre, Veninga Theo, Schild Steven E

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar 15;73(4):1077-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.035. Epub 2008 Aug 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the results of whole-brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery (WBRT+SRS) with those of surgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy and a boost to the metastatic site (OP+WBRT+boost) for patients with one or two brain metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Survival, intracerebral control, and local control of the treated metastases were retrospectively evaluated. To reduce the risk of selection bias, a matched-pair analysis was performed. The outcomes of 47 patients who received WBRT+SRS were compared with those of a second cohort of 47 patients who recieved OP+WBRT+boost. The two treatment groups were matched for the following potential prognostic factors: WBRT schedule, age, gender, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extracerebral metastases, recursive partitioning analysis class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to WBRT.

RESULTS

The 1-year survival rates were 65% after WBRT+SRS and 63% after OP+WBRT+boost (p = 0.19). The 1-year intracerebral control rates were 70% and 78% (p = 0.39), respectively. The 1-year local control rates were 84% and 83% (p = 0.87), respectively. On multivariate analyses, improved survival was significantly associated with better performance status (p = 0.009), no extracerebral metastases (p = 0.004), recursive partitioning analysis Class 1 (p = 0.004), and interval from tumor diagnosis to WBRT (p = 0.001). Intracerebral control was not significantly associated with any of the potential prognostic factors. Improved local control was significantly associated with no extracerebral metastases (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment outcomes were not significantly different after WBRT+SRS compared with OP+WBRT+boost. However, WBRT+SRS is less invasive than OP+WBRT+boost and may be preferable for patients with one or two brain metastases. The results should be confirmed by randomized trials.

摘要

目的

比较全脑放疗联合立体定向放射外科治疗(WBRT+SRS)与手术联合全脑放疗并对转移部位进行强化治疗(OP+WBRT+强化)用于治疗一或两个脑转移瘤患者的效果。

方法和材料

对治疗后转移瘤的生存率、脑内控制情况和局部控制情况进行回顾性评估。为降低选择偏倚风险,进行了配对分析。将47例接受WBRT+SRS治疗的患者与另一组47例接受OP+WBRT+强化治疗的患者的结果进行比较。两个治疗组在以下潜在预后因素上进行了匹配:WBRT方案、年龄、性别、体能状态、肿瘤类型、脑转移瘤数量、脑外转移瘤、递归分区分析类别以及从肿瘤诊断到WBRT的时间间隔。

结果

WBRT+SRS治疗后1年生存率为65%,OP+WBRT+强化治疗后为63%(p = 0.19)。1年脑内控制率分别为70%和78%(p = 0.39)。1年局部控制率分别为84%和&3%(p = 0.87)。多因素分析显示,生存率提高与较好的体能状态(p = 0.009)、无脑外转移瘤(p = 0.004)、递归分区分析1类(p = 0.004)以及从肿瘤诊断到WBRT的时间间隔(p = 0.001)显著相关。脑内控制与任何潜在预后因素均无显著相关性。局部控制改善与无脑外转移瘤显著相关(p = 0.037)。

结论

与OP+WBRT+强化相比,WBRT+SRS治疗后的结果无显著差异。然而,WBRT+SRS的侵入性低于OP+WBRT+强化,对于有一或两个脑转移瘤的患者可能更可取。结果应通过随机试验进行验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验