• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[肿瘤学家和他的病人]

[The oncologist and his patient].

作者信息

Obrecht J P

机构信息

Departement Innere Medizin, Kantonsspital Basel.

出版信息

Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 1991 Apr 23;80(17):450-5.

PMID:1871471
Abstract

The motifs of medical practise, in particular by the oncologist and the basic experience of the patient notably the cancer patient are presented. They represent the prerequisite for an individually taylored, solid relationship between physician and patient founding on mutual trust. Medical practise is nowadays founded on a scientific rationale. In contrast to earlier times the ethos of compassion pertains the private sphere. It is the physicians individual choice to proffer the traditional compassion as interest in the fate of an individual patient or not. The fundamental experience of an individual that his destiny lies no longer in his own hands expresses itself in a paradigmatic way by the perception of his illness. The cancer patient experiences--as other patients do--the threats but also his healing as occurrences not caused by him. He therefore does not identify his disease with objective impairments or pathologic findings. On the contrary, he perceives it as a threat to himself, his existence and his personality. The patient experiences his fate, to depend on circumstances and particularly on other individuals, their benevolence, their acceptance, their help. Trust is the basis for relationship between the cancer patient and his physician. Trust is also acceptance of dependence. Dependence is only acceptable if the physician is trustworthy. Trustworthiness cannot be gained by scientific competence alone but requires personal affection by compassion with the patients fate. The physician needs ethical competence to fulfill his task. Information of the patient gains a particular importance in this context. It, as well as the divergent assessment of the disease by patient and physician--the anthropologic difference--and the "equilibrating systems" are exposed.

摘要

本文介绍了医疗实践的主题,尤其是肿瘤学家的实践以及患者,特别是癌症患者的基本经历。它们是建立在相互信任基础上,医生与患者之间建立个性化、稳固关系的前提。如今的医疗实践基于科学原理。与早期不同,同情的精神属于私人领域。医生是否提供传统的同情,即对个体患者命运的关注,是其个人选择。个体认为自己的命运不再掌握在自己手中的基本体验,通过对疾病的感知以一种典型的方式表现出来。癌症患者和其他患者一样,体验到威胁,但也将康复视为并非由自己导致的事情。因此,他不会将自己的疾病等同于客观损伤或病理发现。相反,他将其视为对自己、自己的存在和个性的威胁。患者体验到自己的命运取决于各种情况,特别是取决于其他人、他们的善意、接纳和帮助。信任是癌症患者与其医生之间关系的基础。信任也是对依赖的接受。只有当医生值得信赖时,依赖才是可接受的。值得信赖不能仅靠科学能力获得,还需要对患者命运的同情所带来的个人情感。医生需要具备道德能力来完成其任务。在这种情况下,向患者提供信息具有特别重要的意义。文中揭示了这一点,以及患者和医生对疾病的不同评估——人类学差异——和“平衡系统”。

相似文献

1
[The oncologist and his patient].[肿瘤学家和他的病人]
Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax. 1991 Apr 23;80(17):450-5.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[The sick physician. A patient like every other?].[患病的医生。和其他病人一样吗?]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2001 Aug 9;143(31-32):22-4.
4
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
5
"Just Another Statistic".“只是又一个统计数字”
Oncologist. 1998;3(3):III-IV.
6
Decision making in the critically ill patient.危重症患者的决策制定
Prim Care. 1985 Jun;12(2):341-52.
7
Back to the Future for Clinical Oncology.临床肿瘤学的《回到未来》
Oncologist. 1996;1(1 & 2):I.
8
[Patients and physicians: cross representations anthropological study of the construction of individuality in radiation therapy].[患者与医生:放射治疗中个体性构建的交叉表征人类学研究]
Bull Cancer. 2005 Jul;92(7):741-5.
9
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].[共同决策:增强患者参与康复的一种方法]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097.
10
[Interview in medicine].[医学访谈]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1996 Jul 2;85(27-28):863-9.