Parekh Sameer, Stein Kenneth M
Division of Cardiology, Cornell University Medical Center, 520 East 70th Street, Starr-4, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008 Sep;10(5):351-9. doi: 10.1007/s11886-008-0057-6.
Although it has become traditional to place permanent pacemaker leads at the right ventricular apex and right atrial appendage, pacing from these locations poorly mimics normal physiology. A growing evidence base shows that right ventricular apical pacing results in ventricular dyssynchrony and various adverse effects. Provocative data from early trials suggest that pacing from alternate sites in the right ventricle--His bundle pacing, para-Hisian pacing, septal right ventricular outflow tract pacing, and right ventricular midseptal pacing--may lead to improved results. Similarly, early data suggest that right atrial pacing near Bachmann's bundle may lead to superior outcomes when compared with pacing from the right atrial appendage. Several large-scale, randomized clinical trials are now under way to establish the future role of selective site pacing.
尽管将永久性起搏器电极置于右心室心尖部和右心耳已成为传统做法,但从这些部位进行起搏很难模拟正常生理状态。越来越多的证据表明,右心室心尖部起搏会导致心室不同步及各种不良影响。早期试验的激发性数据表明,从右心室的其他部位起搏——希氏束起搏、希氏束旁起搏、室间隔右心室流出道起搏和右心室中隔起搏——可能会带来更好的结果。同样,早期数据表明,与从右心耳起搏相比,在巴赫曼束附近进行右心房起搏可能会产生更好的结果。目前正在进行几项大规模随机临床试验,以确定选择性部位起搏的未来作用。