Suppr超能文献

无现场外科支持的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗

Percutaneous coronary intervention without onsite surgical backup.

作者信息

Dehmer Gregory J

机构信息

Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Scott and White Clinic, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX 76508, USA.

出版信息

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2008 Sep;10(5):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s11886-008-0064-7.

Abstract

Although accepted in several countries abroad, the performance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without onsite surgical backup is controversial in the United States. Current guidelines from the United States do not endorse elective PCI in facilities without onsite surgical backup but acknowledge that primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is acceptable under carefully regulated and monitored circumstances. This differs from guidelines developed by organizations in other countries. In the United States, data indicate that primary alone or primary and elective PCI without onsite surgery is currently being performed in all but seven states, and the number of patients treated in this setting is increasing. More than 40 articles reporting the outcomes and safety of PCI without onsite surgical backup have been published, but these are from a limited number of centers and are retrospective reviews or prospective registries, which have inherent limitations. Additional studies are currently under way to evaluate PCI's safety and effectiveness in this setting.

摘要

尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在国外一些国家已被接受,但在美国,在没有现场手术支持的情况下进行PCI存在争议。美国目前的指南不支持在没有现场手术支持的机构进行择期PCI,但承认在经过仔细规范和监测的情况下,对ST段抬高型心肌梗死进行直接PCI是可以接受的。这与其他国家组织制定的指南不同。在美国,数据表明,目前除了七个州之外,其他各州都在进行没有现场手术支持的单纯直接PCI或直接与择期PCI,并且在这种情况下接受治疗的患者数量正在增加。已经发表了40多篇报告没有现场手术支持的PCI的结果和安全性的文章,但这些文章来自数量有限的中心,并且是回顾性综述或前瞻性注册研究,存在固有的局限性。目前正在进行更多研究,以评估在这种情况下PCI的安全性和有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验