Aguerrevere Luis E, Greve Kevin W, Bianchini Kevin J, Meyers John E
Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans-Lakefront, New Orleans, LA 70148, United States.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(7-8):831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2008.06.008. Epub 2008 Aug 19.
Meyers, Millis, and Volkert [Meyers, J. E., Millis, S. R., & Volkert, K. (2002). A validity index for the MMPI-2. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 157-169] developed a method to detect malingering in chronic pain patients using seven scales from the Minnesota Multiphasic Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). This method may be impractical because two of the scales (Obvious minus Subtle and Dissimulation-revised) are not reported by the commercially available Pearson computerized scoring system. The current study recalculated the Meyers Index using the five Pearson-provided scales in the chronic pain data sets of Meyers et al. [Meyers, J. E., Millis, S. R., & Volkert, K. (2002). A validity index for the MMPI-2. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 157-169] and Bianchini, Etherton, Greve, Heinly, and Meyers [Bianchini, K. J., Etherton, J. L., Greve, K. W., Heinly, M. T., & Meyers, J. E. (in press). Classification accuracy of MMPI-2 validity scales in the detection of pain-related malingering: A known-groups approach. Assessment], and the traumatic brain injury data of Greve, Bianchini, Love, Brennan, and Heinly [Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Love, J. M., Brennan, A., & Heinly, M. T. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of MMPI-2 validity scales and indicators to malingered neurocognitive dysfunction in traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 491-512]. Classification accuracy of the abbreviated Meyers Index was comparable to the original. These findings demonstrate that the abbreviated Meyers Index can be used as a substitute of the original Meyers Index without decrements in classification accuracy.
迈尔斯、米利斯和沃尔克特[迈尔斯,J.E.,米利斯,S.R.,&沃尔克特,K.(2002年)。《明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2》(MMPI-2)的一个效度指标。《临床神经心理学档案》,17,157 - 169]开发了一种方法,使用明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2(MMPI-2)中的七个量表来检测慢性疼痛患者中的伪装情况。这种方法可能不实用,因为其中两个量表(明显减去微妙和伪装修订版)在市售的皮尔逊计算机计分系统中未报告。当前研究在迈尔斯等人[迈尔斯,J.E.,米利斯,S.R.,&沃尔克特,K.(2002年)。《明尼苏达多相人格调查表-2》的一个效度指标。《临床神经心理学档案》,17,157 - 169]以及比安奇尼、埃瑟顿、格雷夫、海因利和迈尔斯[比安奇尼,K.J.,埃瑟顿,J.L.,格雷夫,K.W.,海因利,M.T.,&迈尔斯,J.E.(即将发表)。MMPI-2效度量表在检测与疼痛相关的伪装方面的分类准确性:一种已知群体方法。《评估》]的慢性疼痛数据集中,使用皮尔逊提供的五个量表重新计算了迈尔斯指数,并在格雷夫、比安奇尼、洛夫、布伦南和海因利[格雷夫,K.W.,比安奇尼,K.J.,洛夫,J.M.,布伦南,A.,&海因利,M.T.(2006年)。MMPI-2效度量表和指标对创伤性脑损伤中伪装的神经认知功能障碍的敏感性和特异性。《临床神经心理学家》,20,491 - 512]的创伤性脑损伤数据集中进行了重新计算。简化版迈尔斯指数的分类准确性与原版相当。这些发现表明,简化版迈尔斯指数可以用作原版迈尔斯指数的替代品,而不会降低分类准确性。