Schiff J H, Fornaschon A S, Frankenhauser S, Schiff M, Snyder-Ramos S A, Martin E, Knapp S, Bauer M, Böttiger B W, Motsch J
Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidbelberg, Germany.
Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1096-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05576.x. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
We have developed a questionnaire to assess patients' peri-anaesthetic satisfaction. We recruited 1398 patients and 59 health care professionals for construction and validation. Relevant items were rated for preferences. The resulting questions underwent a cognitive and a standard pretest. The resultant Heidelberg Peri-anaesthetic Questionnaire consists of 38 questions about five identified themes: trust and atmosphere; fear; discomfort; treatment by personnel; and information and waiting. Internal consistency was demonstrated for the sum score (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79) and the five factors (Cronbach's alpha = 0.42-0.79). Multivariate analysis found significant influences of age, school education, marital status and duration of anaesthesia. Dissatisfied patients had a median (IQR [range]) of 73% (66-76% [35-83]), and satisfied patients 92% (90-94% [88-100]) of the sum score. The Heidelberg Peri-anaesthetic Questionnaire offers a valid and reliable way to identify dissatisfied patients and generate quality improvement and also has use as a benchmark tool.
我们编制了一份问卷,用于评估患者围麻醉期的满意度。我们招募了1398名患者和59名医疗保健专业人员参与问卷的编制与验证。对相关项目进行偏好评分。最终形成的问题经过了认知预测试和标准预测试。最终的海德堡围麻醉期问卷由38个问题组成,涉及五个确定的主题:信任与氛围、恐惧、不适、医护人员的治疗以及信息与等待。总分(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.79)和五个因素(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.42 - 0.79)均显示出内部一致性。多变量分析发现年龄、受教育程度、婚姻状况和麻醉持续时间有显著影响。不满意患者的总分中位数(四分位间距[范围])为73%(66 - 76%[35 - 83]),满意患者为92%(90 - 94%[88 - 100])。海德堡围麻醉期问卷为识别不满意患者、促进质量改进提供了一种有效且可靠的方法,还可作为一种基准工具。