Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Palhoça, SC, Brazil; Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Anestesia, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Ultralitho Centro Médico, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):744471. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
The Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale (ISAS) was developed to assess the satisfaction of patients undergoing sedation with monitored anesthesia care. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the ISAS instrument and evaluate the acceptability, validity, and reliability of the proposed Brazilian version (ISAS-Br).
The cross-cultural adaptation process involved translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, pre-testing, and final review of the ISAS-Br. A cross-sectional study was conducted, involving 127 adult individuals undergoing ambulatory surgeries with moderate/deep sedation. The acceptability, reliability, and construct validity of the scale were assessed.
The cross-cultural adaptation process did not require significant changes to the final version of the scale. The ISAS-Br demonstrated excellent acceptability, with a completion rate of 99% and an average completion time of 4.6 minutes. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors: emotional well-being, physical comfort, and anxiety relief, with respective composite reliability coefficient values of 0.874, 0.580, and 0.428. The test-retest reliability of the ISAS-Br, measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient, was 0.67 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.42 to 0.83), and the Bland-Altman plot showed satisfactory agreement between the measurements.
The proposed Brazilian version of the ISAS underwent successful cross-cultural adaptation according to international standards. It demonstrated good acceptability and reliability, regarding the assessment of temporal stability. However, the ISAS-Br exhibited low internal consistency for some factors, indicating that this instrument lacks sensitivity to assess the satisfaction of deeply sedated patients. Further studies are necessary to explore the hypotheses raised based on the knowledge of its psychometric properties.
爱荷华州麻醉满意度量表(ISAS)是为评估接受监测麻醉下镇静的患者满意度而开发的。本研究旨在对 ISAS 工具进行跨文化调适,并评估所提出的巴西版本(ISAS-Br)的可接受性、有效性和可靠性。
跨文化调适过程包括翻译、综合、回译、专家委员会审查、预测试和 ISAS-Br 的最终审查。一项横断面研究涉及 127 名接受门诊手术中深度镇静的成人患者。评估了该量表的可接受性、信度和结构效度。
跨文化调适过程未要求对量表的最终版本进行重大更改。ISAS-Br 具有极佳的可接受性,完成率为 99%,平均完成时间为 4.6 分钟。探索性因子分析显示三个因子:情绪健康、身体舒适度和焦虑缓解,各自的综合可靠性系数值分别为 0.874、0.580 和 0.428。ISAS-Br 的重测信度,通过组内相关系数测量,为 0.67(95%置信区间 [95%CI] 0.42 至 0.83),Bland-Altman 图显示测量之间具有令人满意的一致性。
根据国际标准,所提出的 ISAS 巴西版本成功进行了跨文化调适。它在评估时间稳定性方面表现出良好的可接受性和可靠性。然而,ISAS-Br 在某些因素上表现出较低的内部一致性,表明该工具缺乏敏感性来评估深度镇静患者的满意度。需要进一步研究来探索基于其心理测量特性提出的假设。