• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化老年人身体活动研究的招募工作:不同方法的随机对照试验

Optimising recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people: a randomised controlled trial of different approaches.

作者信息

Harris Tess J, Carey Iain M, Victor Christina R, Adams Rika, Cook Derek G

机构信息

Division of Community Health Sciences, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, Tooting, London, SW17ORE, UK.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):659-65. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn159. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afn159
PMID:18718924
Abstract

BACKGROUND

physical activity studies in older people often have poor recruitment. Including a questionnaire with the invitation would provide information about non-participants and selection bias, but could reduce recruitment. Telephone contact might encourage participation.

OBJECTIVE

to test the effects of different strategies for recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people.

DESIGN

factorial randomised controlled trial. Randomisation by household into four groups: telephone contact plus questionnaire, telephone contact only, questionnaire only, neither.

SETTING

primary care, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

560 patients > or = 65 years randomly selected after exclusions.

INTERVENTIONS

questionnaire to assess health, functional ability and physical activity. Telephone contact by the research nurse a week after sending study information.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

recruitment into physical activity study.

RESULTS

telephone contact increased recruitment: contact 47.9% (134/280), no contact 37.9% (106/280), difference (adjusted for the clustering effect of household) 10.0% (95% CI 0.2-19.8). Questionnaire inclusion did not significantly reduce recruitment: no questionnaire 44.3% (124/280) questionnaire 41.4% (116/280) difference -2.9% (95% CI -12.7-7.0).

CONCLUSIONS

telephone contact significantly increased recruitment and should be considered in studies where recruitment may be low. While inclusion of a questionnaire provided valuable information on non-participants and did not significantly reduce recruitment, an adverse recruitment effect could not be excluded.

摘要

背景

针对老年人的体育活动研究往往招募情况不佳。在邀请函中附上问卷能提供有关未参与者的信息及选择偏倚情况,但可能会降低招募率。电话联系或许能鼓励参与。

目的

测试不同策略对老年人体育活动研究招募情况的影响。

设计

析因随机对照试验。按家庭随机分为四组:电话联系加问卷、仅电话联系、仅问卷、两者皆无。

地点

英国牛津郡初级医疗保健机构。

参与者

排除后随机选取560名年龄≥65岁的患者。

干预措施

通过问卷评估健康状况、功能能力和体育活动情况。研究护士在发送研究信息一周后进行电话联系。

主要观察指标

参与体育活动研究的招募情况。

结果

电话联系增加了招募率:有联系的为47.9%(134/280),无联系的为37.9%(106/280),差异(校正家庭聚类效应后)为10.0%(95%可信区间0.2 - 19.8)。包含问卷并未显著降低招募率:无问卷的为44.3%(124/280),有问卷的为41.4%(116/280),差异为 - 2.9%(95%可信区间 - 12.7 - 7.0)。

结论

电话联系显著提高了招募率,在招募率可能较低的研究中应予以考虑。虽然附上问卷能提供有关未参与者的有价值信息且未显著降低招募率,但不能排除对招募有不利影响。

相似文献

1
Optimising recruitment into a study of physical activity in older people: a randomised controlled trial of different approaches.优化老年人身体活动研究的招募工作:不同方法的随机对照试验
Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):659-65. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn159. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
2
Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches.基于社区的调查中,比较邮寄、互联网和电话模式的应答率和成本效益:采用通用或个性化招募方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Aug 31;12:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-132.
3
Less healthy, but more active: opposing selection biases when recruiting older people to a physical activity study through primary care.健康状况较差但活动较多:通过初级保健招募老年人参加体育活动研究时存在的相反选择偏差
BMC Public Health. 2008 May 27;8:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-182.
4
Effect of telephone counseling on physical activity for low-active older people in primary care: a randomized, controlled trial.电话咨询对基层医疗中低活动水平老年人身体活动的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):986-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01203.x.
5
Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.安抚奶嘴的使用与母乳喂养、婴儿猝死综合征、感染和牙齿咬合不正的关系。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2005 Jul;3(6):147-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-6988.2005.00024.x.
6
Strategies to enhance recruitment of rural-dwelling older people into community-based trials.提高农村老年人参与社区试验招募率的策略。
Nurse Res. 2015 Sep;23(1):40-3. doi: 10.7748/nr.23.1.40.e1345.
7
Why families choose not to participate in research: feedback from non-responders.家庭选择不参与研究的原因:来自未回应者的反馈。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 Jan;49(1):57-62. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12020. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
8
A randomised controlled trial of an active telephone-based recruitment strategy to increase childcare-service staff attendance at a physical activity and nutrition training workshop.一项主动电话招募策略的随机对照试验,以增加儿童保育服务人员参加体育活动和营养培训研讨会的出勤率。
Health Promot J Austr. 2013 Dec;24(3):224-6. doi: 10.1071/HE13055.
9
Sooner and healthier: a randomised controlled trial and interview study of an early discharge rehabilitation service for older people.更快且更健康:一项针对老年人早期出院康复服务的随机对照试验及访谈研究。
Age Ageing. 2004 May;33(3):246-52. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afh076.
10
Factors impacting questionnaire response in a Dutch retrospective cohort study.荷兰一项回顾性队列研究中影响问卷回复率的因素。
Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(03)00123-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Recruiting patients for falls prevention in the emergency department - worth the challenge.在急诊科招募预防跌倒的患者——值得挑战。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 21;23(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04607-5.
2
The challenge of recruiting multimorbid older patients identified in a hospital database to a randomised controlled trial.从医院数据库中招募患有多种合并症的老年患者参加随机对照试验面临的挑战。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022 Dec;34(12):3115-3121. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02263-0. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
3
Using self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial.
利用自我决定理论理解并改进“ Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) 试验”的招募。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 19;16(11):e0259873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259873. eCollection 2021.
4
Complex lifestyle intervention among inactive older adults with elevated cardiovascular disease risk and obesity: a mixed-method, single-arm feasibility study for RESTART-a randomized controlled trial.对心血管疾病风险升高且肥胖的不活动老年人进行复杂生活方式干预:一项用于RESTART(一项随机对照试验)的混合方法单臂可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Oct 27;7(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00921-0.
5
Feasibility of a home-based foot-ankle exercise programme for musculoskeletal dysfunctions in people with diabetes: randomised controlled FOotCAre (FOCA) Trial II.基于家庭的足部-踝关节运动方案治疗糖尿病患者肌肉骨骼功能障碍的可行性:随机对照 FOotCAre(FOCA)试验 II。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 11;11(1):12404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91901-0.
6
Current Challenges Faced by Cancer Clinical Trials in Addressing the Problem of Under-Representation of Older Adults: A Narrative Review.癌症临床试验在解决老年成年人代表性不足问题上面临的当前挑战:一项叙述性综述。
Oncol Ther. 2021 Jun;9(1):55-67. doi: 10.1007/s40487-021-00140-w. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
7
A randomised feasibility study assessing an intervention to keep adults physically active after falls management exercise programmes end.一项随机可行性研究,评估在跌倒管理锻炼计划结束后让成年人保持身体活跃的干预措施。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Mar 7;6:37. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00570-9. eCollection 2020.
8
The Tribulations of Trials: Lessons Learnt Recruiting 777 Older Adults Into REtirement in ACTion (REACT), a Trial of a Community, Group-Based Active Aging Intervention Targeting Mobility Disability.试验的困境:从招募 777 名老年人参加针对行动障碍的社区、小组式积极老龄化干预试验(REACT)中学到的经验。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Nov 13;75(12):2387-2395. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa051.
9
Effects of a behavioral medicine intervention on pain, health, and behavior among community-dwelling older adults: a randomized controlled trial.社区居住的老年人群中行为医学干预对疼痛、健康和行为的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Jul 5;14:1207-1220. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S208102. eCollection 2019.
10
Morita Therapy for depression (Morita Trial): a pilot randomised controlled trial.森田疗法治疗抑郁症(森田试验):一项初步随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 10;8(8):e021605. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021605.