Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Aug 31;12:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-132.
Epidemiological research often requires collection of data from a representative sample of the community or recruitment of specific groups through broad community approaches. The population coverage of traditional survey methods such as mail-outs to residential addresses, and telephone contact via public directories or random-digit-dialing is declining and survey response rates are falling. There is a need to explore new sampling frames and consider multiple response modes including those offered by changes in telecommunications and internet technology.
We evaluated response rates and cost-effectiveness for three modes of survey administration (postal invitation/postal survey, postal invitation/internet survey and postal invitation/telephone survey) and two styles of contact approach (personalised and generic) in a community survey of greywater use. Potential respondents were contacted only once, with no follow up of non-responders.
The telephone survey produced the highest adjusted response rate (30.2%), followed by the personalised postal survey (10.5%), generic postal survey (7.5%) and then the internet survey (4.7% for the personalised approach and 2.2% for the generic approach). There were some differences in household characteristics and greywater use rates between respondents to different survey modes, and between respondents to personalised and generic approaches. These may be attributable to the differing levels of motivations needed for a response, and varying levels of interest in the survey topic among greywater users and non-users. The generic postal survey had the lowest costs per valid survey received (Australian $22.93), followed by the personalised postal survey ($24.75).
Our findings suggest that postal surveys currently remain the most economic option for population-based studies, with similar costs for personalised and generic approaches. Internet surveys may be effective for specialised groups where email lists are available for initial contact, but barriers other than household internet access still exist for community-based surveys. Given the increasing recruitment challenges facing community-based studies, there is an imperative to gather contemporary comparative data on different survey modes and recruitment approaches in order to determine their strengths, limitations and costs. Researchers also need to document and report on the potential biases in the target and respondent populations and how this may affect the data collected.
流行病学研究通常需要从社区的代表性样本中收集数据,或者通过广泛的社区方法招募特定的群体。传统调查方法(如邮寄给住宅地址,以及通过公共电话簿或随机数字拨号进行电话联系)的人口覆盖面正在下降,调查回复率也在下降。因此,需要探索新的抽样框架,并考虑多种响应模式,包括电信和互联网技术变革带来的模式。
我们评估了三种调查管理模式(邮寄邀请/邮寄调查、邮寄邀请/互联网调查和邮寄邀请/电话调查)和两种联系方式(个性化和通用)在灰色水使用社区调查中的响应率和成本效益。潜在的受访者只被联系一次,没有对未回复者进行后续跟踪。
电话调查产生的调整后响应率最高(30.2%),其次是个性化邮寄调查(10.5%)、通用邮寄调查(7.5%),然后是互联网调查(个性化方法为 4.7%,通用方法为 2.2%)。不同的调查模式和个性化与通用方法的受访者之间存在一些家庭特征和灰色水使用率的差异。这些差异可能归因于响应所需的不同动机水平,以及灰色水使用者和非使用者对调查主题的不同兴趣水平。通用邮寄调查的每个有效调查的成本最低(澳大利亚 22.93 美元),其次是个性化邮寄调查(24.75 美元)。
我们的研究结果表明,对于基于人群的研究,邮寄调查目前仍然是最经济的选择,个性化和通用方法的成本相似。互联网调查对于有电子邮件列表可供初步联系的特定群体可能是有效的,但对于基于社区的调查,除了家庭互联网接入之外,仍然存在其他障碍。鉴于社区研究面临越来越大的招募挑战,有必要收集不同调查模式和招募方法的当代比较数据,以确定它们的优势、局限性和成本。研究人员还需要记录和报告目标人群和受访者人群中的潜在偏差,以及这可能如何影响收集的数据。