Corrigan Rosemary, McBurney Helen
School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1411-9. doi: 10.1080/09638280701654542.
Community ambulation is an important goal for both clients and health professionals yet it is an outcome only variously achieved by clients discharged from rehabilitation settings back into their community.
To review the available literature about the assessment tools that are currently used to determine community ambulation status and to determine from an evaluation of these tools the effectiveness of the evaluation when compared to known environmental dimensions that impact on ambulation in the community.
A review of published papers from English language literature using CINAHL, ProQuest, Medline and other databases was conducted.
Only eight papers were found in the literature to inform health professionals about the impact of the environment on community ambulation. No current mobility assessment tools were identified that assess all the environmental demands that can impact on the activity of community ambulation. From the tools reviewed the most frequently evaluated environmental mobility dimensions were walking distance and time constraints.
Health professionals need assessment tools that evaluate the impact of the environment on an individual's mobility in order to determine community ambulation status. The literature to date provides little guidance about the impact of the environment and current evaluation tools are limited in clinical usefulness with respect to the depth and breadth of information gained.
社区行走能力对于患者和医疗专业人员而言都是一个重要目标,但这只是从康复机构出院回归社区的患者在不同程度上实现的一个结果。
回顾目前用于确定社区行走能力状况的评估工具的现有文献,并通过对这些工具的评估,确定与已知影响社区行走的环境因素相比时评估的有效性。
使用护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、ProQuest、医学在线数据库(Medline)和其他数据库对英语文献中已发表的论文进行综述。
文献中仅发现八篇论文,为医疗专业人员提供了有关环境对社区行走能力影响的信息。目前尚未发现能评估所有可能影响社区行走活动的环境要求的移动性评估工具。在所审查的工具中,最常评估的环境移动性因素是行走距离和时间限制。
医疗专业人员需要能够评估环境对个体移动性影响的评估工具,以确定社区行走能力状况。迄今为止的文献对于环境影响几乎没有提供指导,并且就所获得信息的深度和广度而言,当前的评估工具在临床实用性方面有限。