• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物定时器测定法,一种无需对样本进行处理即可对生物膜中的葡萄球菌属进行计数的新方法,用于评估生物膜的抗生素敏感性。

BioTimer Assay, a new method for counting Staphylococcus spp. in biofilm without sample manipulation applied to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility of biofilm.

作者信息

Pantanella Fabrizio, Valenti Piera, Frioni Alessandra, Natalizi Tiziana, Coltella Luana, Berlutti Francesca

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale A. Moro 5, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Microbiol Methods. 2008 Dec;75(3):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.07.027. Epub 2008 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.mimet.2008.07.027
PMID:18721833
Abstract

The medical device-related infections are frequently a consequence of Staphylococcus biofilm, a lifestyle enhancing bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Antibiotic susceptibility tests are usually performed on planktonic forms of clinical isolates. Some methods have been developed to perform antibiotic susceptibility tests on biofilm. However, none of them counts bacterial inoculum. As antibiotic susceptibility is related to bacterial inoculum, the test results could be mistaken. Here, a new method, BioTimer Assay (BTA), able to count bacteria in biofilm without any manipulation of samples, is presented. Moreover, the BTA method is applied to analyze antibiotic susceptibility of six Staphylococcus strains in biofilm and to determine the number of viable bacteria in the presence of sub-inhibitory doses of four different antibiotics. To validate BTA, the new method was compared to reference methods both for counting and antibiotic susceptibility tests. A high agreement between BTA and reference methods is found on planktonic forms. Therefore, BTA was employed to count bacteria in biofilm and to analyze biofilm antibiotic susceptibility. Results confirm the high resistance to antibiotics of Staphylococcus biofilm. Moreover, BTA counts the number of viable bacteria in the presence of sub-inhibitory doses of antibiotics. The results show that the number of viable bacteria depends on sub-inhibitory doses, age of biofilm and type of antibiotic. In particular, differently to gentamicin and ampicillin, sub-inhibitory doses of ofloxacin and azithromycin reduce the number of viable bacteria at lower extent in young than in old biofilm. In conclusion, BTA is a reliable, rapid, easy-to-perform, and versatile method, and it can be considered a useful tool to analyze antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus spp. in biofilm.

摘要

与医疗设备相关的感染通常是由葡萄球菌生物膜引起的,这种生存方式增强了细菌对抗生素的耐药性。抗生素敏感性测试通常针对临床分离株的浮游形式进行。已经开发了一些方法来对生物膜进行抗生素敏感性测试。然而,这些方法都没有对细菌接种量进行计数。由于抗生素敏感性与细菌接种量有关,测试结果可能会出现错误。在此,提出了一种新方法——生物定时器测定法(BTA),该方法能够在不对样品进行任何处理的情况下对生物膜中的细菌进行计数。此外,BTA方法被用于分析六种葡萄球菌菌株在生物膜中的抗生素敏感性,并确定在四种不同抗生素亚抑菌剂量存在下的活菌数量。为了验证BTA,将这种新方法与参考方法在计数和抗生素敏感性测试方面进行了比较。在浮游形式上,发现BTA与参考方法之间具有高度一致性。因此,BTA被用于对生物膜中的细菌进行计数并分析生物膜的抗生素敏感性。结果证实了葡萄球菌生物膜对抗生素具有高度耐药性。此外,BTA能够在抗生素亚抑菌剂量存在的情况下对活菌数量进行计数。结果表明,活菌数量取决于亚抑菌剂量、生物膜的年龄和抗生素的类型。特别是,与庆大霉素和氨苄西林不同,亚抑菌剂量的氧氟沙星和阿奇霉素在年轻生物膜中比在老年生物膜中降低活菌数量的程度要小。总之,BTA是一种可靠、快速、易于操作且通用的方法,可被视为分析生物膜中葡萄球菌属抗生素敏感性的有用工具。

相似文献

1
BioTimer Assay, a new method for counting Staphylococcus spp. in biofilm without sample manipulation applied to evaluate antibiotic susceptibility of biofilm.生物定时器测定法,一种无需对样本进行处理即可对生物膜中的葡萄球菌属进行计数的新方法,用于评估生物膜的抗生素敏感性。
J Microbiol Methods. 2008 Dec;75(3):478-84. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.07.027. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
2
Influence of sub-inhibitory antibiotics and flow condition on Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 biofilm development and biofilm growth rate: BioTimer assay as a study model.亚抑菌浓度抗生素和流动条件对金黄色葡萄球菌ATCC 6538生物膜形成及生物膜生长速率的影响:以BioTimer分析作为研究模型
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2014 Nov;67(11):763-9. doi: 10.1038/ja.2014.66. Epub 2014 May 28.
3
[Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to vancomycin, gemtamicin and rifampin].金黄色葡萄球菌生物被膜对万古霉素、庆大霉素和利福平的敏感性
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2010 Apr;59(2):80-7.
4
Minimal attachment killing (MAK): a versatile method for susceptibility testing of attached biofilm-positive and -negative Staphylococcus epidermidis.最小附着杀伤法(MAK):一种用于检测附着生物膜阳性和阴性表皮葡萄球菌药敏性的通用方法。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2002 Oct;191(2):107-14. doi: 10.1007/s00430-002-0125-2. Epub 2002 Jun 29.
5
Impact of biofilm on the in vitro activity of vancomycin alone and in combination with tigecycline and rifampicin against Staphylococcus aureus.生物膜对万古霉素单独以及与替加环素和利福平联合使用时针对金黄色葡萄球菌的体外活性的影响。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Mar;63(3):485-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn513. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
6
The combination of ultrasound with antibiotics released from bone cement decreases the viability of planktonic and biofilm bacteria: an in vitro study with clinical strains.骨水泥释放的抗生素与超声联合使用可降低浮游菌和生物膜细菌的活力:一项针对临床菌株的体外研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Dec;58(6):1287-90. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl402. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
7
Comparison of biofilm-associated cell survival following in vitro exposure of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to the antibiotics clindamycin, daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline and vancomycin.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌生物被膜在体外暴露于抗生素克林霉素、达托霉素、利奈唑胺、替加环素和万古霉素后与生物被膜相关的细胞存活率比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009 Apr;33(4):374-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.08.029. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
8
Differences in biofilm development and antibiotic susceptibility among clinical Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum isolates.临床解脲脲原体和微小脲原体分离株在生物膜形成及抗生素敏感性方面的差异。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Nov;62(5):1027-30. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn337. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
9
Tigecycline inhibition of a mature biofilm in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus : comparison with other drugs.替加环素对金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株中成熟生物膜的抑制作用:与其他药物的比较。
FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010 Aug;59(3):466-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00701.x. Epub 2010 May 19.
10
Application of a feasible method for determination of biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility in staphylococci.应用可行的方法测定葡萄球菌生物膜的抗菌药敏性。
APMIS. 2010 Nov;118(11):873-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02681.x. Epub 2010 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Biofilm-Associated Candidiasis: Pathogenesis, Prevalence, Challenges and Therapeutic Options.生物膜相关性念珠菌病:发病机制、患病率、挑战与治疗选择
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Mar 25;18(4):460. doi: 10.3390/ph18040460.
2
Modern Microbiological Methods to Detect Biofilm Formation in Orthopedy and Suggestions for Antibiotic Therapy, with Particular Emphasis on Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI).检测骨科生物膜形成的现代微生物学方法及抗生素治疗建议,特别强调人工关节感染(PJI)
Microorganisms. 2024 Jun 14;12(6):1198. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12061198.
3
Proof-of-Concept Standardized Approach Using a Single-Disk Method Analogous to Antibiotic Disk Diffusion Assays for Routine Phage Susceptibility Testing in Diagnostic Laboratories.
用于诊断实验室常规噬菌体药敏试验的概念验证标准化方法,采用类似于抗生素药敏纸片扩散法的单盘法。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2022 Dec 13;88(23):e0030922. doi: 10.1128/aem.00309-22. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Challenges in the Microbiological Diagnosis of Implant-Associated Infections: A Summary of the Current Knowledge.植入物相关感染的微生物学诊断挑战:当前知识总结
Front Microbiol. 2021 Oct 29;12:750460. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.750460. eCollection 2021.
5
BioTimer assay as complementary method to vortex-sonication-vortex technique for the microbiological diagnosis of implant associated infections.生物定时器检测法作为一种补充方法,与涡旋-超声-涡旋技术联合应用于植入物相关感染的微生物学诊断。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 17;9(1):7534. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44045-1.
6
The Effects of β-Lactam Antibiotics on Surface Modifications of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli: A Multiscale Approach.β-内酰胺类抗生素对多重耐药性大肠杆菌表面修饰的影响:一种多尺度方法
Microsc Microanal. 2019 Feb;25(1):135-150. doi: 10.1017/S1431927618015696.
7
Options and Limitations in Clinical Investigation of Bacterial Biofilms.细菌生物膜临床研究中的选择与局限。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018 Apr 4;31(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00084-16. Print 2018 Jul.
8
Towards individualized diagnostics of biofilm-associated infections: a case study.迈向生物膜相关感染的个体化诊断:一项案例研究。
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2017 Sep 28;3:22. doi: 10.1038/s41522-017-0030-5. eCollection 2017.
9
Bacteria viability assessment after photocatalytic treatment.光催化处理后细菌活力评估。
3 Biotech. 2014 Apr;4(2):149-157. doi: 10.1007/s13205-013-0137-1. Epub 2013 May 21.
10
A method for quantitative determination of biofilm viability.一种用于定量测定生物膜活力的方法。
J Funct Biomater. 2012 Jun 1;3(2):418-31. doi: 10.3390/jfb3020418.