Yiou E, Heugas A M, Mezaour M, Le Bozec S
Laboratory of Motor Control and Perception, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Paris-Sud 11, 91440 Orsay Cedex, France.
Gait Posture. 2009 Jan;29(1):97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.07.003. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
This study tested the effect of lower limb muscle fatigue induced by series of high-level isometric contractions (IC) on postural adjustments and maintenance of erect posture. Subjects (N=7) displaced a bar (grasp-bar) forward with both hands at maximal velocity towards a target ("bilateral forward-reach" task, BFR), before and after a procedure designed to induce fatigue in dorsal leg muscles. This procedure included IC at 60% of maximum. Postural joint and grasp-bar motion, along with electrical activity of postural and focal muscles were recorded. Integrated electromyographical (EMG) activity per 20 ms period ranging from 400 ms before BFR onset (t0) to 400 ms after t0 was compared before and after the fatiguing procedure. This time-window included "anticipatory", "on-line" and "corrective" postural adjustments, i.e. those postural adjustments occurring before (APAs), during (OPAs) and after (CPAs) BFR, respectively. In contrast to the literature, results showed that the fatiguing procedure had no effect on muscle excitation or timing in any of the recorded postural muscles, regardless of APA, OPA or CPA-related time-window. Therefore, the postural drive did not change with fatigue. Furthermore, the peak-to-peak motion at postural joints did not change. Postural maintenance was therefore not additionally challenged. These results are in line with the hypothesis that the effect of fatigue on postural adjustments is dependent on the adequacy between fatigued motor units (MUs) and MUs recruited during the postural adjustments. Increasing IC intensity during the fatiguing procedure might therefore not necessarily exacerbate the effect of fatigue on postural control highlighted during lower level IC.
本研究测试了一系列高水平等长收缩(IC)诱发的下肢肌肉疲劳对姿势调整和直立姿势维持的影响。在一项旨在使小腿背侧肌肉疲劳的程序前后,受试者(N = 7)双手以最大速度向前推动一根杆(握杆)至目标处(“双侧前伸”任务,BFR)。该程序包括以最大力量的60%进行等长收缩。记录姿势关节和握杆的运动,以及姿势肌和局部肌肉的电活动。比较疲劳程序前后,从BFR开始前400毫秒(t0)到t0后400毫秒期间每20毫秒的积分肌电图(EMG)活动。这个时间窗口包括“预期”、“在线”和“校正”姿势调整,即分别在BFR之前(APAs)、期间(OPAs)和之后(CPAs)发生的那些姿势调整。与文献不同的是,结果表明,无论与APA、OPA或CPA相关的时间窗口如何,疲劳程序对任何记录的姿势肌的肌肉兴奋或时间安排均无影响。因此,姿势驱动不会随疲劳而改变。此外,姿势关节处的峰峰值运动没有变化。姿势维持因此没有受到额外的挑战。这些结果与以下假设一致,即疲劳对姿势调整的影响取决于疲劳运动单位(MUs)与姿势调整期间募集的MUs之间的匹配程度。因此,在疲劳程序中增加等长收缩强度不一定会加剧较低水平等长收缩时突出显示的疲劳对姿势控制的影响。