Norris Patrick R, Stein Phyllis K, Morris John A
Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
J Crit Care. 2008 Sep;23(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
We have shown previously that reduced integer heart rate variability (HRVi) predicts death in trauma patients. We hypothesized that heart rate multiscale entropy (MSE), a potential measurement of physiologic complexity, would predict death more robustly than HRVi.
Two hundred eighty-five patients had heart rate data meeting completeness and density criteria (>12 hours, >/=0.4 Hz) available in the first 24 hours after admission. Missing data points were interpolated, and a publicly available algorithm (MSE of Costa et al; Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005;71[2 Pt 1]) was applied (www.physionet.org, m = 2, r = 0.15). Integer heart rate variability was computed using methods described previously (percentage of 5-minute intervals having heart rate SD between 0.3 and 0.6). Sample entropy was compared between survivors and nonsurvivors at each scale factor using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Logistic regression was used to assess risk of death based on HRVi, MSE, and/or covariates (age, sex, injury severity).
Decreased HRVi and MSE each predicted hospital mortality (median day of death, 3; mean, 7.1). Multiscale entropy-based risk stratification (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.76, scale 15) was superior to HRVi (AUC = 0.70), but this difference in AUC was not statistically significant. Multiscale entropy stratified patients by mortality at every scale factor (P < .001).
Multiscale entropy and HRVi measured within the first 24 hours each identify trauma patients at increased risk of subsequent hospital death.
我们之前已经表明,降低的整数心率变异性(HRVi)可预测创伤患者的死亡。我们假设心率多尺度熵(MSE)作为生理复杂性的一种潜在测量指标,比HRVi更能有力地预测死亡。
285例患者在入院后的头24小时内有符合完整性和密度标准(>12小时,≥0.4 Hz)的心率数据。对缺失的数据点进行插值,并应用一种公开可用的算法(Costa等人的MSE;《物理评论E:统计、非线性与软物质物理》。2005年;71[2 Pt 1])(www.physionet.org,m = 2,r = 0.15)。使用先前描述的方法计算整数心率变异性(心率标准差在0.3至0.6之间的5分钟间隔的百分比)。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较每个尺度因子下幸存者和非幸存者之间的样本熵。使用逻辑回归基于HRVi、MSE和/或协变量(年龄、性别、损伤严重程度)评估死亡风险。
HRVi和MSE降低均预测了医院死亡率(死亡中位数日,3天;平均,7.1天)。基于多尺度熵的风险分层(受试者操作特征曲线下面积[AUC]=0.76,尺度15)优于HRVi(AUC = 0.70),但AUC的这种差异无统计学意义。多尺度熵在每个尺度因子下按死亡率对患者进行分层(P <.001)。
在头24小时内测量的多尺度熵和HRVi均可识别出随后有医院死亡风险增加的创伤患者。