Fisher R L, Hofmann A F, Converse J L, Rossi S S, Lan S P
Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New Haven, Connecticut.
Hepatology. 1991 Sep;14(3):454-63.
To test whether hepatotoxicity occurring in National Cooperative Gallstone Study patients was caused by a toxic effect of chenodiol per se or of lithocholate caused by defective sulfation, bile samples were analyzed using a new high-performance liquid chromatography method that measures the proportions of the four individual lithocholate amidates (sulfated and unsulfated lithocholylglycine and lithocholyltaurine) and all common bile acid amidates. Samples were obtained from National Cooperative Gallstone Study patients (n = 17) with abnormal light microscopic liver biopsy results or major aminotransferase elevations and from a matched control group of patients (n = 14) who received similar chenodiol doses but had no evidence of liver injury. Bile samples from 45 healthy subjects were also analyzed. The analytical method was validated by showing that the percentage of chenodiol and cholic and deoxycholic acid obtained by high-performance liquid chromatography correlated highly (r greater than 0.94) with previous gas-liquid chromatography analyses of these samples by the National Cooperative Gallstone Study Reference Laboratory. No significant differences were seen between gallstone patients with and without evidence of liver injury for percent total lithocholate amidates, percent sulfated or unsulfated lithocholate amidates or percent chenodiol amidates. Lithocholate was partially sulfated in all bile samples (52% +/- 17% [mean +/- S.D., n = 50]), but the extent of sulfation varied widely between and within patients during the course of therapy. Mean values of healthy subjects were similar and also showed a wide range in the extent of lithocholate sulfation. It is concluded that (a) liver injury caused by these doses of chenodiol could not be attributed to the accumulation of unsulfated lithocholate per se in circulating bile acids; (b) liver injury appeared to be, directly or indirectly, caused by enrichment in circulating bile acids with chenodiol or chenodiol together with lithocholate, suggesting that the hepatocytes of those patients with hepatotoxicity were injured by the change induced in bile-acid metabolism by the feeding of chenodiol; and (c) about half of lithocholate amidates in bile samples were sulfated, but the extent of sulfation was highly variable both in gallstone patients and healthy subjects.
为了检验在全国合作胆结石研究患者中出现的肝毒性是由鹅去氧胆酸本身的毒性作用还是由硫酸化缺陷导致的石胆酸盐的毒性作用引起的,使用一种新的高效液相色谱法对胆汁样本进行分析,该方法可测量四种石胆酸酰胺(硫酸化和未硫酸化的石胆酰甘氨酸和石胆酰牛磺酸)以及所有常见胆汁酸酰胺的比例。样本取自全国合作胆结石研究中肝活检光镜结果异常或主要转氨酶升高的患者(n = 17),以及接受相似鹅去氧胆酸剂量但无肝损伤证据的匹配对照组患者(n = 14)。还分析了45名健康受试者的胆汁样本。通过证明高效液相色谱法获得的鹅去氧胆酸、胆酸和脱氧胆酸的百分比与全国合作胆结石研究参考实验室之前对这些样本进行的气液色谱分析高度相关(r大于0.94),验证了该分析方法。在有和没有肝损伤证据的胆结石患者之间,总石胆酸酰胺百分比、硫酸化或未硫酸化石胆酸酰胺百分比或鹅去氧胆酸酰胺百分比均未观察到显著差异。所有胆汁样本中的石胆酸盐均有部分硫酸化(52%±17%[平均值±标准差,n = 50]),但在治疗过程中,患者之间以及患者体内硫酸化程度差异很大。健康受试者的平均值相似,石胆酸盐硫酸化程度也有很大差异。得出的结论是:(a)这些剂量的鹅去氧胆酸引起的肝损伤不能归因于循环胆汁酸中未硫酸化石胆酸盐本身的积累;(b)肝损伤似乎直接或间接由循环胆汁酸中鹅去氧胆酸或鹅去氧胆酸与石胆酸盐的富集引起,这表明那些有肝毒性的患者的肝细胞因喂食鹅去氧胆酸引起的胆汁酸代谢变化而受到损伤;(c)胆汁样本中约一半的石胆酸酰胺被硫酸化,但胆结石患者和健康受试者的硫酸化程度都高度可变。