Suppr超能文献

胆囊癌的生化流行病学

Biochemical epidemiology of gallbladder cancer.

作者信息

Strom B L, Soloway R D, Rios-Dalenz J, Rodriguez-Martinez H A, West S L, Kinman J L, Crowther R S, Taylor D, Polansky M, Berlin J A

机构信息

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia 19194-6021, USA.

出版信息

Hepatology. 1996 Jun;23(6):1402-11. doi: 10.1002/hep.510230616.

Abstract

To evaluate the a priori hypotheses that an increased level of glyco and tauro lithocholic acid, perhaps because of a decreased capacity for hepatic sulfation, contributed to the biochemical epidemiology of gallbladder cancer, a case-control study was undertaken at four hospitals in La Paz, Bolivia, and at one hospital in Mexico City, Mexico. Eighty-four cases with newly diagnosed histologically confirmed gallbladder cancer were compared with 264 controls with cholelithiasis or choledocholithiasis in the absence of cancer and with 126 controls with normal biliary tracts. All study subjects were undergoing abdominal surgery. Interview data were collected for all study subjects, as well as blood, bile, and gallstone specimens when feasible. Sera were analyzed for carcinoembryonic antigen, cholesterol concentration, and total bile acids. Bile specimens were analyzed for carcinoembryonic antigen; and for concentration of bile salts; cholesterol; phospholipids; and the glycine and taurine conjugates of cholic, ursodeoxycholic, chenodeoxycholic, deoxycholic, and lithocholates; sulfoglycolithocholate; and sulfotaurolithocholate. Gallstone specimens were analyzed for the percentage of cholesterol content, the percentage of calcium bilirubinate content, and the percentage of calcium carbonate content. Serum bile acids were increased in cases versus the two control groups (median 11.7 nmol/mL vs. 9.3 nmol/mL for stone controls and 8.2 nmol/L for nonstone controls, P < or = .02 for each pairwise comparison). Biliary bile acids were markedly decreased in the cases (median 3.98 micromol/mL vs. 33.09 micromol/mL, and 154.0 micromol/L, respectively, P < or = .0001 for each comparison), even after excluding those with a serum bilirubin higher than 2.0 mg/dL. Bile cholesterol was lower for the cases as well (median 1.70 micromol/mL vs. 4.90 micromol/mL, and 16.81 micromol/ mL, respectively, P < or = .02), as was the concentration of bile phospholipids (median 2.97 micromol/mL vs. 6.26 micromol/mL, and 52.69 micromol/mL, P = .1 and .0004, respectively). Contrary to our a priori hypothesis, there was no difference between the cases and either control group in their bile concentrations of lithocholate, the proportion of bile acids which were sulfated, or the concentration of nonsulfated lithocholate. However, the cases had a higher concentration of ursodeoxycholate (UDC) (P < .004 for both control groups), especially glycoursodeoxycholate (P < .001 for both control groups). A previously published suggestion that gallstone size differed between cases and controls was not confirmed. In conclusion, cases with gallbladder cancer differed from controls with stones and from controls with normal biliary tracts in their serum and bile biochemistries. These findings may be a reflection of the disease process, or may provide useful clues to its pathogenesis.

摘要

为了评估以下先验假设,即由于肝脏硫酸化能力下降,导致甘氨石胆酸和牛磺石胆酸水平升高,这对胆囊癌的生化流行病学有影响,在玻利维亚拉巴斯的四家医院以及墨西哥墨西哥城的一家医院开展了一项病例对照研究。将84例新诊断的经组织学确诊的胆囊癌病例与264例患有胆石症或胆总管结石且无癌症的对照以及126例胆道正常的对照进行比较。所有研究对象均接受腹部手术。收集了所有研究对象的访谈数据,并在可行时收集血液、胆汁和胆结石标本。分析血清中的癌胚抗原、胆固醇浓度和总胆汁酸。分析胆汁标本中的癌胚抗原;以及胆汁盐浓度;胆固醇;磷脂;胆酸、熊去氧胆酸、鹅去氧胆酸、脱氧胆酸和石胆酸的甘氨酸和牛磺酸共轭物;硫酸甘氨石胆酸;以及硫酸牛磺石胆酸。分析胆结石标本中的胆固醇含量百分比、胆红素钙含量百分比和碳酸钙含量百分比。与两个对照组相比,病例组的血清胆汁酸升高(结石对照组中位数为11.7 nmol/mL,非结石对照组为9.3 nmol/mL,正常对照组为8.2 nmol/L,每组两两比较P≤0.02)。病例组的胆汁胆汁酸显著降低(中位数分别为3.98 μmol/mL,与33.09 μmol/mL和154.0 μmol/L相比,每次比较P≤0.0001),即使排除血清胆红素高于2.0 mg/dL的患者也是如此。病例组的胆汁胆固醇也较低(中位数分别为1.70 μmol/mL,与4.90 μmol/mL和16.81 μmol/mL相比,P≤0.02),胆汁磷脂浓度也是如此(中位数分别为2.97 μmol/mL,与6.26 μmol/mL和52.69 μmol/mL相比,P分别为0.1和0.0004)。与我们的先验假设相反,病例组与任何一个对照组在石胆酸的胆汁浓度、硫酸化胆汁酸的比例或非硫酸化石胆酸的浓度方面均无差异。然而,病例组的熊去氧胆酸(UDC)浓度较高(两个对照组P均<0.004),尤其是甘氨熊去氧胆酸(两个对照组P均<0.001)。先前发表的关于病例组和对照组胆结石大小不同的说法未得到证实。总之,胆囊癌病例在血清和胆汁生化方面与结石对照组和胆道正常对照组不同。这些发现可能反映了疾病过程,也可能为其发病机制提供有用线索。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验