Maxwell K, Streetly A, Bevan D
Department of Public Health Sciences, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's Schools of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, King's College of London, London SE1 3QD, UK.
West J Med. 1999 Nov;171(5-6):306-13.
To investigate how sociocultural factors influence the management of pain from sickle cell disease by comparing the experiences of those who usually manage their pain at home with the experiences of those who are more frequently admitted to hospital for management of their pain.
Qualitative analysis of semistructured individual interviews and focus group discussions.
57 participants with genotype SS or S/beta-thal (44 participants) or SC (9 participants); the status of 4 participants was unknown. 40 participants took part in focus groups, 6 took part in both focus groups and interviews, and 9 were interviewed only. Participants were allocated to focus groups according to ethnic origin, sex, and the number of times that they had been admitted to the hospital for the management of painful crises during the previous year.
The relation between patients with sickle cell disease and hospital services is one of several major, nonclinical dimensions that shape experiences of pain management and behavior for seeking health care. Participants' experiences of hospital care show a range of interrelated themes that are common to most participants across variables of sex, ethnicity, and which hospital was attended. Themes identified included the mistrust of patients with sickle cell disease, stigmatization, excessive control (including both overtreatment and undertreatment of pain) and neglect. Individuals responded to the challenge of negotiating care with various strategies. Patients with sickle cell disease who are frequently admitted to hospital may try to develop long-term relationships with their caregivers, become passive or aggressive in their interactions with health professionals, or regularly attend different hospitals. Those who usually manage their pain at home expressed a strong sense of responsibility for the management of their pain and advocated self-education, assertiveness, and resistance as strategies toward hospital services.
The organization and delivery of management for the pain of a sickle cell crisis discourages self-reliance and encourages hospital dependence. Models of care should recognize the chronic nature of sickle cell disorders and give priority to patients' involvement in their care.
通过比较在家中自行处理疼痛的患者与更频繁因疼痛入院治疗的患者的经历,探讨社会文化因素如何影响镰状细胞病疼痛的管理。
对半结构化个人访谈和焦点小组讨论进行定性分析。
57名基因型为SS或S/β-地中海贫血(44名参与者)或SC(9名参与者)的患者;4名参与者的状况未知。40名参与者参加了焦点小组,6名参与者同时参加了焦点小组和访谈,9名仅接受了访谈。参与者根据种族、性别以及前一年因疼痛危象入院治疗的次数被分配到焦点小组。
镰状细胞病患者与医院服务之间的关系是影响疼痛管理体验和寻求医疗行为的几个主要非临床维度之一。参与者的住院护理经历显示出一系列相互关联的主题,这些主题在性别、种族和就诊医院等变量的大多数参与者中都很常见。确定的主题包括镰状细胞病患者的不信任、污名化、过度控制(包括对疼痛的过度治疗和治疗不足)和忽视。个体通过各种策略应对协商护理的挑战。经常入院的镰状细胞病患者可能会试图与他们的护理人员建立长期关系,在与医护人员的互动中变得被动或激进,或者定期前往不同的医院。那些通常在家中自行处理疼痛的患者对疼痛管理表达了强烈的责任感,并倡导自我教育、坚定自信和抵制作为应对医院服务的策略。
镰状细胞危象疼痛管理的组织和提供方式不利于患者自力更生,反而鼓励患者依赖医院。护理模式应认识到镰状细胞病的慢性本质,并优先考虑患者参与自身护理。