Meijman F J
VU Medisch Centrum, afd. Metamedica, Postbus 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Aug 9;152(32):1760-4.
The exchange of information on individual healthcare and public health as well as public opinion on medical matters are characterized by their own systems of values, norms and conventions that are not always compatible. All of these aspects put together give public communication on health and care its complex and dynamic nature--where the interests of the individual and the community are often opposed. In this respect, the free interaction of publicity forces and the educational role of healthcare providers have traditionally been the backbone of policy in the Netherlands. There is only limited support by public money, only a few restrictions (for example, on direct-to-consumer drug-advertising) but no substantive guidance from the government. Websites funded from public money that provide information on healthcare have only been set up in the last few years. The Health Council of the Netherlands has recently proposed trust marking for screening tests only. Research is urgently needed with regard to health literacy, direct-to-consumer advertising and public communication on the appropriate use of care. Furthermore, professional opinion in the public arena is required as well as a more active role on the part of clinical and scientific professionals in the area of public debate.
个人医疗保健信息与公共卫生信息的交流,以及公众对医疗事务的看法,都有其各自的价值体系、规范和惯例,而这些并不总是相互兼容的。所有这些方面综合起来,使得关于健康与护理的公共交流具有复杂多变的性质——个人利益与社区利益往往相互对立。在这方面,宣传力量的自由互动以及医疗保健提供者的教育作用,传统上一直是荷兰政策的支柱。公共资金的支持有限,仅有一些限制措施(例如,针对直接面向消费者的药品广告),但政府没有实质性的指导。由公共资金资助的提供医疗保健信息的网站只是在过去几年才建立起来。荷兰卫生委员会最近仅提议对筛查测试进行信任标识。迫切需要开展关于健康素养、直接面向消费者的广告以及关于合理使用护理的公共交流的研究。此外,还需要公共领域的专业意见,以及临床和科学专业人员在公共辩论领域发挥更积极的作用。