Suppr超能文献

口腔卫生专业学生在进行牙面清洁操作时,5种不同手指支撑位置对其手臂肌肉活动的影响。

Effects of 5 different finger rest positions on arm muscle activity during scaling by dental hygiene students.

作者信息

Cosaboom-FitzSimons Mary E, Tolle Susan Lynn, Darby Michele L, Walker Martha L

机构信息

Mesa Community College, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Hyg. 2008 Summer;82(4):34. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to determine the effects of 5 different finger rest positions: opposite arch, standard intraoral, basic extraoral, cross arch, and finger on finger on the muscle activity of 4 forearm muscles (extensor carpi radialis longus, flexor carpi ulnaris, biceps brachii, and pronator teres) during a simulated periodontal scaling experience.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 32 consenting senior dental hygiene students who met inclusion criteria participated. Using a 4 x 5 counter-balanced research design, each participant used a Gracey 11/12 curet to scale one cc of artificial calculus from first permanent molar typodont teeth (#3,14,19,30). Five different typodonts were set up for each participant with fulcrums randomly assigned for use on each typodont. While scaling, the participant's muscle activity was measured by surface electromyography. Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to determine if significant differences existed in the amount of muscle activity generated with each fulcrum.

RESULTS

Results revealed no statistically significant interaction effect between area of the mouth scaled, muscle activity, and fulcrum used. Similar muscle activity was produced throughout the mouth regardless of the fulcrum used. The upper right quadrant produced the most muscle activity (p= 0.0101) and the lower left quadrant produced the least (p=< .0001). When comparing the overall muscle activity generated with each fulcrum, only the cross arch fulcrum when compared to the opposite fulcrum produced statistically significant results (p=0.0110).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results, similar muscle activity is produced when using any of the 5 fulcrums in each quadrant of the mouth. Clinicians appear to experience minimal ergonomic advantage in terms of fulcrums used and area of the mouth scaled during a simulated scaling experience.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定5种不同手指支撑位置(对侧牙弓、标准口内、基本口外、交叉牙弓和手指搭在手指上)在模拟牙周刮治过程中对4块前臂肌肉(桡侧腕长伸肌、尺侧腕屈肌、肱二头肌和旋前圆肌)肌肉活动的影响。

方法

选取32名符合纳入标准且同意参与的高年级牙科卫生专业学生作为便利样本。采用4×5平衡研究设计,每位参与者使用Gracey 11/12刮治器从第一恒磨牙模型牙(#3、14、19、30)上刮下1立方厘米的人工牙石。为每位参与者设置5个不同的模型牙,支点随机分配用于每个模型牙。在刮治过程中,通过表面肌电图测量参与者的肌肉活动。采用重复测量的双向方差分析来确定每个支点产生的肌肉活动量是否存在显著差异。

结果

结果显示,在刮治的口腔区域、肌肉活动和使用的支点之间,没有统计学上显著的交互作用。无论使用何种支点,整个口腔产生的肌肉活动相似。右上象限产生的肌肉活动最多(p = 0.0101),左下象限产生的最少(p < 0.0001)。当比较每个支点产生的总体肌肉活动时,只有交叉牙弓支点与对侧支点相比产生了统计学上显著的结果(p = 0.0110)。

结论

基于这些结果,在口腔的每个象限使用5种支点中的任何一种时,都会产生相似的肌肉活动。在模拟刮治过程中,临床医生在使用的支点和刮治的口腔区域方面似乎体验到的人体工程学优势最小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验