Mulimani Priti, Hoe Victor Cw, Hayes Melanie J, Idiculla Jose Joy, Abas Adinegara Bl, Karanth Laxminarayan
Oral Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, 1959 Pacific Street NE, Seattle, WA, USA, 98195.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 15;10(10):CD011261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011261.pub2.
Dentistry is a profession with a high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) among practitioners, with symptoms often starting as early in the career as the student phase. Ergonomic interventions in physical, cognitive, and organisational domains have been suggested to prevent their occurrence, but evidence of their effects remains unclear.
To assess the effect of ergonomic interventions for the prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among dental care practitioners.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO ProQuest, NIOSHTIC, NIOSHTIC-2, HSELINE, CISDOC (OSH-UPDATE), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal to August 2018, without language or date restrictions.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster RCTs, in which participants were adults, aged 18 and older, who were engaged in the practice of dentistry. At least 75% of them had to be free from musculoskeletal pain at baseline. We only included studies that measured at least one of our primary outcomes; i.e. physician diagnosed WMSD, self-reported pain, or work functioning.
Three authors independently screened and selected 20 potentially eligible references from 946 relevant references identified from the search results. Based on the full-text screening, we included two studies, excluded 16 studies, and two are awaiting classification. Four review authors independently extracted data, and two authors assessed the risk of bias. We calculated the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous outcomes. We assessed the quality of the evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.
We included two RCTs (212 participants), one of which was a cluster-randomised trial. Adjusting for the design effect from clustering, reduced the total sample size to 210. Both studies were carried out in dental clinics and assessed ergonomic interventions in the physical domain, one by evaluating a multi-faceted ergonomic intervention, which consisted of imparting knowledge and training about ergonomics, work station modification, training and surveying ergonomics at the work station, and a regular exercise program; the other by studying the effectiveness of two different types of instrument used for scaling in preventing WMSDs. We were unable to combine the results from the two studies because of the diversity of interventions and outcomes.Physical ergonomic interventions. Based on one study, there is very low-quality evidence that a multi-faceted intervention has no clear effect on dentists' risk of WMSD in the thighs (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.42; 102 participants), or feet (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.41; 102 participants) when compared to no intervention over a six-month period. Based on one study, there is low-quality evidence of no clear difference in elbow pain (MD -0.14, 95% CI -0.39 to 0.11; 110 participants), or shoulder pain (MD -0.32, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.11; 110 participants) in participants who used light weight curettes with wider handles or heavier curettes with narrow handles for scaling over a 16-week period.Cognitive ergonomic interventions. We found no studies evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive ergonomic interventions.Organisational ergonomic interventions. We found no studies evaluating the effectiveness of organisational ergonomic interventions.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is very low-quality evidence from one study showing that a multi-faceted intervention has no clear effect on dentists' risk of WMSD in the thighs or feet when compared to no intervention over a six-month period. This was a poorly conducted study with several shortcomings and errors in statistical analysis of data. There is low-quality evidence from one study showing no clear difference in elbow pain or shoulder pain in participants using light weight, wider handled curettes or heavier and narrow handled curettes for scaling over a 16-week period.We did not find any studies evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive ergonomic interventions or organisational ergonomic interventions.Our ability to draw definitive conclusions is restricted by the paucity of suitable studies available to us, and the high risk of bias of the studies that are available. This review highlights the need for well-designed, conducted, and reported RCTs, with long-term follow-up that assess prevention strategies for WMSDs among dental care practitioners.
牙科是从业者中与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSD)患病率较高的职业,症状通常早在职业生涯的学生阶段就开始出现。有人建议在身体、认知和组织领域进行人体工程学干预以预防其发生,但这些干预措施的效果证据仍不明确。
评估人体工程学干预对预防牙科保健从业者工作相关肌肉骨骼疾病的效果。
我们检索了截至2018年8月的CENTRAL、MEDLINE(PubMed)、Embase、PsycINFO、ProQuest、NIOSHTIC、NIOSHTIC - 2、HSELINE、CISDOC(职业安全与健康更新数据库)、ClinicalTrials.gov以及世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)检索门户,无语言或日期限制。
我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT)、半随机对照试验和整群随机对照试验,其中参与者为18岁及以上从事牙科工作的成年人。他们中至少75%在基线时无肌肉骨骼疼痛。我们仅纳入了至少测量了一项主要结局的研究;即医生诊断的WMSD、自我报告的疼痛或工作功能。
三位作者独立筛选并从搜索结果中确定的946篇相关参考文献中选择了20篇潜在合格参考文献。基于全文筛选,我们纳入了两项研究,排除了16项研究,两项正在等待分类。四位综述作者独立提取数据,两位作者评估偏倚风险。我们计算了连续结局的平均差(MD)及其95%置信区间(CI),以及二分结局的风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间。我们使用GRADE方法评估每个结局的证据质量。
我们纳入了两项RCT(212名参与者),其中一项是整群随机试验。考虑到整群设计效应后,总样本量减少至210。两项研究均在牙科诊所进行,评估了身体领域的人体工程学干预,一项评估了多方面的人体工程学干预,包括传授人体工程学知识和培训、工作站改造、在工作站进行人体工程学培训和调查以及定期锻炼计划;另一项研究了两种不同类型的洁治器械在预防WMSD方面的有效性。由于干预措施和结局的多样性,我们无法合并两项研究的结果。
身体人体工程学干预。基于一项研究,有极低质量的证据表明,与六个月不进行干预相比,多方面干预对牙医大腿(RR 0.57,95%CI 0.23至1.42;102名参与者)或足部(RR 0.64,95%CI 0.29至1.41;102名参与者)发生WMSD的风险没有明显影响。基于一项研究,有低质量的证据表明,在16周内使用手柄较宽的轻型刮匙或手柄较窄的重型刮匙进行洁治的参与者中,肘部疼痛(MD -0.14,95%CI -0.39至0.11;110名参与者)或肩部疼痛(MD -0.32,95%CI -0.75至0.11;110名参与者)没有明显差异。
认知人体工程学干预。我们未发现评估认知人体工程学干预有效性的研究。
组织人体工程学干预。我们未发现评估组织人体工程学干预有效性的研究。
一项研究提供了极低质量的证据,表明与六个月不进行干预相比,多方面干预对牙医大腿或足部发生WMSD的风险没有明显影响。这是一项开展得较差的研究,在数据统计分析方面存在几个缺点和错误。一项研究提供了低质量的证据,表明在16周内使用手柄较宽的轻型刮匙或手柄较窄的重型刮匙进行洁治的参与者中,肘部疼痛或肩部疼痛没有明显差异。我们未发现任何评估认知人体工程学干预或组织人体工程学干预有效性的研究。我们得出明确结论的能力受到可用的合适研究数量稀少以及现有研究的高偏倚风险的限制。本综述强调需要设计良好、实施得当且报告规范的RCT,并进行长期随访,以评估牙科保健从业者中WMSD的预防策略。