Suppr超能文献

长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)单次给药与短效GnRHa每日给药在体外受精-胚胎移植周期中的临床疗效比较。

Comparison of clinical efficacy between a single administration of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles.

作者信息

Cheon Kang Woo, Song Sang Jin, Choi Bum Chae, Lee Seung Chul, Lee Hong Bok, Yu Seung Youn, Yoo Keun Jai

机构信息

Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Samsung Women's Hospital, Suwon, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2008 Aug;23(4):662-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.4.662.

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a single administration of long-acting gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) as compared with daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles. The mean dosage of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) required for COH (2,354.5+/-244.2 vs. 2,012.5+/-626.1 IU) and the rFSH dosage per retrieved oocyte (336.7+/-230.4 vs. 292.1+/-540.4 IU) were significantly higher in the long-acting GnRHa group (N= 22) than those in the short-acting GnRHa group (N=28) (p<0.05). However, the mean number of visit to the hospital that was required before ovum pick-up (3.3+/-0.5 vs. 22.2+/-2.0) and the frequency of injecting GnRHa and rFSH (12.8+/-1.2 vs. 33.5+/- 3.5) were significantly decreased in the long-acting GnRHa group (p<0.0001). The clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and early pregnancy loss rate were not significantly different between the 2 groups. So, we suggest that a single administration of long-acting GnRHa is a useful alternative for improving patient's convenience with clinical outcomes comparable to daily administrations of short-acting GnRHa in COH for IVF-ET cycles.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在体外受精和胚胎移植(IVF-ET)周期的控制性卵巢刺激(COH)中,单次注射长效促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)与每日注射短效GnRHa相比的疗效。长效GnRHa组(N = 22)COH所需重组促卵泡激素(rFSH)的平均剂量(2,354.5±244.2 vs. 2,012.5±626.1 IU)以及每个回收卵母细胞的rFSH剂量(336.7±230.4 vs. 292.1±540.4 IU)显著高于短效GnRHa组(N = 28)(p<0.05)。然而,长效GnRHa组取卵前所需的平均就诊次数(3.3±0.5 vs. 22.2±2.0)以及GnRHa和rFSH的注射频率(12.8±1.2 vs. 33.5±3.5)显著降低(p<0.0001)。两组的临床妊娠率、着床率和早期妊娠丢失率无显著差异。因此,我们建议单次注射长效GnRHa是一种有用的替代方法,可提高患者的便利性,且在IVF-ET周期的COH中临床结局与每日注射短效GnRHa相当。

相似文献

9
Clinical evaluation of three different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an IVF programme: a prospective study.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Jul 10;103(2):140-5. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00297-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 9;1(1):CD006919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006919.pub5.
2
6
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist protocols for pituitary suppression in assisted reproduction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 9;2015(11):CD006919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006919.pub4.

本文引用的文献

5
Clinical evaluation of three different gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an IVF programme: a prospective study.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Jul 10;103(2):140-5. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00297-4.
10
Psychosocial stress as a cause of infertility.
Fertil Steril. 1993 Mar;59(3):685-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验