• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期病情稳定的癌症患者的情感综合征及其筛查:意大利国际疾病分类第10版数据以及来自南欧心理肿瘤学研究(SEPOS)的苦恼温度计的性能

Affective syndromes and their screening in cancer patients with early and stable disease: Italian ICD-10 data and performance of the Distress Thermometer from the Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study (SEPOS).

作者信息

Grassi Luigi, Sabato Silvana, Rossi Elena, Marmai Luciana, Biancosino Bruno

机构信息

Section of Psychiatry, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Communication and Behavior, University of Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.016
PMID:18757101
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The assessment of mood and anxiety disorders secondary to cancer by using easy-to-administer instruments has been the object of recent research.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of the short screening tool developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines for Distress Management, (0-10 point-scale Distress Thermometer) (DT) in detecting affective syndrome disorders in Italian cancer patients. The sample consisted of 109 cancer outpatients who were administered the ICD-10 psychiatric interview (CIDI), the DT and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS).

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (40.4%) met the criteria for an ICD-10 diagnosis of affective syndromes. The DT was significantly associated with HADS-Total score (r=0.66, p=0.001). A cut-off > or = 4 on the DT showed a sensitivity of 79.5% and a specificity of 75.4% (positive predictive value--PPV = 68.6%; negative predictive value--NPV = 84.5%). The cut-off score > or = 10 on the HADS was associated with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 81.5% (PPV = 76%; NPV = 89.9%). A cut-off score > or = 5 on DT and > or = 15 on HADS maximized sensitivity (78.6% and 85%, respectively) and specificity (83.1% and 96%, respectively) for patients with more severe affective syndromes (major depression, persistent depressive disorders).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that simple instruments can be used as feasible tools in the screening of mood and anxiety disorders among cancer patients.

摘要

背景

使用易于管理的工具评估癌症继发的情绪和焦虑障碍是近期研究的对象。

方法

本研究的目的是检验美国国立综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network)《痛苦管理临床实践指南》开发的简短筛查工具(0 - 10分制痛苦温度计,DT)在检测意大利癌症患者情感综合征障碍方面的准确性。样本包括109名癌症门诊患者,他们接受了国际疾病分类第10版精神科访谈(CIDI)、DT和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。

结果

44名患者(40.4%)符合国际疾病分类第10版情感综合征的诊断标准。DT与HADS总分显著相关(r = 0.66,p = 0.001)。DT得分≥4时,敏感性为79.5%,特异性为75.4%(阳性预测值 - PPV = 68.6%;阴性预测值 - NPV = 84.5%)。HADS得分≥10时,敏感性为86%,特异性为81.5%(PPV = 76%;NPV = 89.9%)。对于患有更严重情感综合征(重度抑郁症、持续性抑郁障碍)的患者,DT得分≥5且HADS得分≥15时,敏感性(分别为78.6%和85%)和特异性(分别为83.1%和96%)达到最大化。

结论

结果表明,简单的工具可作为筛查癌症患者情绪和焦虑障碍的可行工具。

相似文献

1
Affective syndromes and their screening in cancer patients with early and stable disease: Italian ICD-10 data and performance of the Distress Thermometer from the Southern European Psycho-Oncology Study (SEPOS).早期病情稳定的癌症患者的情感综合征及其筛查:意大利国际疾病分类第10版数据以及来自南欧心理肿瘤学研究(SEPOS)的苦恼温度计的性能
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
2
[The accuracy of HADS and GHQ-12 in detecting psychiatric morbidity in breast cancer patients].[医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)和一般健康问卷-12项版(GHQ-12)在检测乳腺癌患者精神疾病方面的准确性]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2010 Spring;21(1):49-59.
3
Pooled results from 38 analyses of the accuracy of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders.38项关于苦恼温度计及其他检测癌症相关情绪障碍的超短方法准确性分析的汇总结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 10;25(29):4670-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0438. Epub 2007 Sep 10.
4
Distress and its correlates in Korean cancer patients: pilot use of the distress thermometer and the problem list.韩国癌症患者的痛苦及其相关因素:痛苦温度计和问题清单的初步应用
Psychooncology. 2008 Jun;17(6):548-55. doi: 10.1002/pon.1275.
5
Can the Distress Thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part I. Initial validation of the Emotion Thermometers tool.痛苦温度计能否通过增加情绪维度得到改善?第一部分:情感温度计工具的初步验证。
Psychooncology. 2010 Feb;19(2):125-33. doi: 10.1002/pon.1523.
6
The HADS and the DT for screening psychosocial distress of cancer patients in Taiwan.用于筛查台湾癌症患者心理社会困扰的 HADS 和 DT。
Psychooncology. 2011 Jun;20(6):639-46. doi: 10.1002/pon.1952. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
7
Screening for anxiety and depression after stroke: comparison of the hospital anxiety and depression scale and the Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale.中风后焦虑和抑郁的筛查:医院焦虑抑郁量表与蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表的比较
J Psychosom Res. 2009 Oct;67(4):325-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
8
Psychiatric morbidity and its screening in Turkish women with breast cancer: a comparison between the HADS and SCID tests.土耳其乳腺癌女性的精神疾病发病率及其筛查:医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)与精神障碍诊断与统计手册(SCID)测试的比较
Psychooncology. 2008 Jul;17(7):668-75. doi: 10.1002/pon.1286.
9
Screening cancer patients' families with the distress thermometer (DT): a validation study.使用苦恼温度计(DT)筛查癌症患者家属:一项验证性研究。
Psychooncology. 2008 Oct;17(10):959-66. doi: 10.1002/pon.1320.
10
Screening for depression and anxiety disorders in primary care patients.对初级保健患者进行抑郁症和焦虑症筛查。
Depress Anxiety. 2007;24(7):455-60. doi: 10.1002/da.20274.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Interventions and Mental Health Outcomes in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.癌症患者的数字干预与心理健康结局:系统评价与荟萃分析
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Aug 14;11:e64754. doi: 10.2196/64754.
2
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) for detecting anxiety disorders in adults.用于检测成人焦虑症的医院焦虑抑郁量表焦虑分量表(HADS-A)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD015456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015456.
3
Evaluation of religious coping strategies in women recently diagnosed with breast cancer in Morocco: baseline findings from a cohort study.
摩洛哥近期确诊乳腺癌女性的宗教应对策略评估:一项队列研究的基线结果
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 22;15(6):e091991. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091991.
4
Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempts, and Suicide Mortality in Cancer: An Overview of Systematic Reviews with Meta-Analysis.癌症患者的自杀意念、自杀未遂及自杀死亡率:一项荟萃分析系统评价概述
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 27;17(11):1788. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111788.
5
Patient Voices: Multimethod Study on the Feasibility of Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Comprehensive Cancer Center.患者之声:关于在综合癌症中心实施电子患者报告结局测量可行性的多方法研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jan 22;11:e56625. doi: 10.2196/56625.
6
The prevalence of anxiety symptoms/disorders in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.癌症患者焦虑症状/障碍的患病率:一项荟萃分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 15;15:1422540. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1422540. eCollection 2024.
7
Cognitive impairment in patients with bipolar disorder alone versus those with bipolar disorder comorbid with borderline personality disorder.仅患有双相情感障碍的患者与合并边缘型人格障碍的双相情感障碍患者的认知障碍。
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 19;14(8):1174-1181. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i8.1174.
8
Promoting post-traumatic growth in cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial of guided written disclosure.促进癌症患者的创伤后成长:一项关于引导性书面披露的随机对照试验
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1285998. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1285998. eCollection 2024.
9
Evaluation of psychological distress is essential for patients with locally advanced breast cancer prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: baseline findings from cohort study.评价局部晚期乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗前的心理困扰至关重要:来自队列研究的基线结果。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02571-1.
10
Using GHQ-12 to Screen Mental Health Issues in People with Emphysema.使用一般健康问卷-12筛查肺气肿患者的心理健康问题。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;11(14):2009. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142009.