Grassi Luigi, Sabato Silvana, Rossi Elena, Marmai Luciana, Biancosino Bruno
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences of Communication and Behavior, University of Ferrara, Italy.
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.016. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
The assessment of mood and anxiety disorders secondary to cancer by using easy-to-administer instruments has been the object of recent research.
The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of the short screening tool developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines for Distress Management, (0-10 point-scale Distress Thermometer) (DT) in detecting affective syndrome disorders in Italian cancer patients. The sample consisted of 109 cancer outpatients who were administered the ICD-10 psychiatric interview (CIDI), the DT and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS).
Forty-four patients (40.4%) met the criteria for an ICD-10 diagnosis of affective syndromes. The DT was significantly associated with HADS-Total score (r=0.66, p=0.001). A cut-off > or = 4 on the DT showed a sensitivity of 79.5% and a specificity of 75.4% (positive predictive value--PPV = 68.6%; negative predictive value--NPV = 84.5%). The cut-off score > or = 10 on the HADS was associated with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 81.5% (PPV = 76%; NPV = 89.9%). A cut-off score > or = 5 on DT and > or = 15 on HADS maximized sensitivity (78.6% and 85%, respectively) and specificity (83.1% and 96%, respectively) for patients with more severe affective syndromes (major depression, persistent depressive disorders).
The results suggest that simple instruments can be used as feasible tools in the screening of mood and anxiety disorders among cancer patients.
使用易于管理的工具评估癌症继发的情绪和焦虑障碍是近期研究的对象。
本研究的目的是检验美国国立综合癌症网络(National Comprehensive Cancer Network)《痛苦管理临床实践指南》开发的简短筛查工具(0 - 10分制痛苦温度计,DT)在检测意大利癌症患者情感综合征障碍方面的准确性。样本包括109名癌症门诊患者,他们接受了国际疾病分类第10版精神科访谈(CIDI)、DT和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。
44名患者(40.4%)符合国际疾病分类第10版情感综合征的诊断标准。DT与HADS总分显著相关(r = 0.66,p = 0.001)。DT得分≥4时,敏感性为79.5%,特异性为75.4%(阳性预测值 - PPV = 68.6%;阴性预测值 - NPV = 84.5%)。HADS得分≥10时,敏感性为86%,特异性为81.5%(PPV = 76%;NPV = 89.9%)。对于患有更严重情感综合征(重度抑郁症、持续性抑郁障碍)的患者,DT得分≥5且HADS得分≥15时,敏感性(分别为78.6%和85%)和特异性(分别为83.1%和96%)达到最大化。
结果表明,简单的工具可作为筛查癌症患者情绪和焦虑障碍的可行工具。