de Waal Frans B M, Leimgruber Kristin, Greenberg Amanda R
Living Links, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 9;105(36):13685-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807060105. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
Helping and sharing among humans is often motivated by empathy and accompanied by a sense of satisfaction. To determine whether similar self-rewarding mechanisms may underpin assistance among nonhuman primates, eight female brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) underwent testing in a simple choice paradigm. Paired with a partner, subjects could select either a "selfish" option that rewarded only themselves, or a "prosocial" option that rewarded both of them. Subjects systematically favored the prosocial option provided their partner was a) familiar, b) visible, and c) receiving rewards of equal value. Prosocial tendencies increased with social closeness, being lowest toward strangers and highest toward kin. That the monkeys understood the options was suggested by greater orientation to the partner during prosocial than selfish choices. Prosocial preferences were reduced by inequity, when the partner received a superior reward. If the view between both monkeys was blocked, choices became strikingly selfish. Thus, under certain conditions, delivering benefits to others seems gratifying to nonhuman primates.
人类之间的帮助和分享往往源于同理心,并伴随着满足感。为了确定类似的自我奖励机制是否可能是灵长类动物之间相互帮助行为的基础,八只雌性棕色卷尾猴(僧帽猴属)在一个简单的选择范式中接受了测试。与同伴配对时,受试猴子可以选择只奖励自己的“自私”选项,或者奖励双方的“亲社会”选项。受试猴子系统地倾向于亲社会选项,条件是它们的同伴要满足以下三点:a)熟悉,b)可见,c)获得同等价值的奖励。亲社会倾向随着社会亲密度的增加而增强,对陌生人的亲社会倾向最低,对亲属的亲社会倾向最高。猴子在亲社会选择时比自私选择时更多地转向同伴,这表明它们理解这些选项。当同伴获得更好的奖励时,不公平会降低亲社会偏好。如果两只猴子之间的视线被阻挡,选择就会变得极其自私。因此,在某些条件下,给其他个体提供好处似乎会让灵长类动物感到满足。