• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对税收和自愿捐赠的神经反应揭示了慈善捐赠的动机。

Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations.

作者信息

Harbaugh William T, Mayr Ulrich, Burghart Daniel R

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1285, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2007 Jun 15;316(5831):1622-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1140738.

DOI:10.1126/science.1140738
PMID:17569866
Abstract

Civil societies function because people pay taxes and make charitable contributions to provide public goods. One possible motive for charitable contributions, called "pure altruism," is satisfied by increases in the public good no matter the source or intent. Another possible motive, "warm glow," is only fulfilled by an individual's own voluntary donations. Consistent with pure altruism, we find that even mandatory, tax-like transfers to a charity elicit neural activity in areas linked to reward processing. Moreover, neural responses to the charity's financial gains predict voluntary giving. However, consistent with warm glow, neural activity further increases when people make transfers voluntarily. Both pure altruism and warm-glow motives appear to determine the hedonic consequences of financial transfers to the public good.

摘要

公民社会能够运转是因为人们缴纳税款并进行慈善捐赠以提供公共物品。慈善捐赠的一个可能动机,即“纯粹利他主义”,无论其来源或意图如何,只要公共物品增加就能得到满足。另一个可能动机,即“温暖光辉效应”,只有通过个人的自愿捐赠才能实现。与纯粹利他主义一致的是,我们发现,即使是像税收一样强制性地向慈善机构转移资金,也会引发与奖励处理相关区域的神经活动。此外,对慈善机构财务收益的神经反应能够预测自愿捐赠行为。然而,与温暖光辉效应一致的是,当人们自愿进行转移时,神经活动会进一步增强。纯粹利他主义和温暖光辉效应这两种动机似乎都决定了向公共物品进行财务转移所带来的享乐后果。

相似文献

1
Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations.对税收和自愿捐赠的神经反应揭示了慈善捐赠的动机。
Science. 2007 Jun 15;316(5831):1622-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1140738.
2
Blood donors' helping behavior is driven by warm glow: more evidence for the blood donor benevolence hypothesis.献血者的助人行为是由温暖的光芒驱动的:更多支持献血者仁慈假设的证据。
Transfusion. 2012 Oct;52(10):2189-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03557.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
3
Charity preferences and perceived impact moderate charitable giving and associated neural response.慈善偏好和感知影响会调节慈善捐赠行为及其相关的神经反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Sep 17;160:107957. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107957. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Human fronto-mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation.人类额颞叶边缘系统网络引导慈善捐赠决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15623-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604475103. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
5
A reward prediction error for charitable donations reveals outcome orientation of donators.慈善捐赠的奖励预测误差揭示了捐赠者的结果导向。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Feb;8(2):216-23. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr088. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
6
The effects of wearing a costume on charitable donations.穿着戏服对慈善捐赠的影响。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Feb;108(1):167-8. doi: 10.2466/01.07.PR0.108.1.167-168.
7
Demotivating incentives and motivation crowding out in charitable giving.慈善捐赠中的动机弱化激励和动机挤出。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 11;114(28):7301-7306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1616921114. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
An experimental test of fundraising appeals targeting donor and recipient benefits.针对捐赠者和受赠者利益的筹款呼吁的实验测试。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1339-1348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01095-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
9
Sure-thing vs. probabilistic charitable giving: Experimental evidence on the role of individual differences in risky and ambiguous charitable decision-making.有把握与概率性慈善捐赠:个体差异在风险和模糊慈善决策中的作用的实验证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0273971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273971. eCollection 2022.
10
Tax economics of charitable giving: pointers for the hospital and donor.慈善捐赠的税收经济学:给医院和捐赠者的建议
Top Health Care Financ. 1980 Winter;7(2):77-89.

引用本文的文献

1
What does a dollar mean to you? utilizing intrinsic rewards within contingency management.一美元对你意味着什么?在权变管理中运用内在奖励。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 21;16:1420763. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1420763. eCollection 2025.
2
[Exploring empathy in first-semester nursing students using the empathy quotient (EQ)Explorando a Empatia de Estudantes de Enfermagem do Primeiro Semestre através do Quociente de Empatia (QE)].[使用共情商数(EQ)探索第一学期护理专业学生的共情能力:通过共情商数(QE)探索第一学期护理专业学生的共情能力]
Rev Cuid. 2022 Oct 14;13(2):e2. doi: 10.15649/cuidarte.1954. eCollection 2022 May-Aug.
3
Psychometric properties of the Arabic versions of the perceived social competence scale and the prosociality scale.
感知社会能力量表和亲社会量表阿拉伯语版本的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Feb 21;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02341-7.
4
Experimental paradigm to test the effects of providing social support: study protocol of the PROSPECT trial (Study 2).测试提供社会支持效果的实验范式:PROSPECT试验(研究2)的研究方案
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 27;13(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02319-y.
5
A reward self-bias leads to more optimal foraging for ourselves than others.奖励自偏差导致我们比他人更能进行更优的觅食行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 5;14(1):26845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69452-x.
6
Everyday helping is associated with enhanced mood but greater stress when it is more effortful.日常帮助与改善情绪有关,但如果需要付出更多努力,就会增加压力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 15;14(1):24120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75261-z.
7
Job satisfaction and happiness keys in the prosocial behavior of citizens in Europe.工作满意度和幸福感是欧洲公民亲社会行为的关键因素。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Oct 1;12(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01972-7.
8
Transcranial electrical stimulation modulates emotional experience and metabolites in the prefrontal cortex in a donation task.经颅电刺激调节捐赠任务中前额叶皮层的情绪体验和代谢物。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 20;14(1):14271. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64876-x.
9
Charitable crowdfunding donation-intention estimation depending on emotional project images using fNIRS-based functional connectivity.基于功能近红外光谱的功能连接,利用情感项目图像对慈善众筹捐赠意向进行估计。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0303144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303144. eCollection 2024.
10
Victim identifiability, number of victims, and unit asking in charitable giving.受害者识别、受害者人数和慈善捐赠中请求的单位。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0300863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300863. eCollection 2024.