Shang Edward, Hasenberg Till, Magdeburg Richard, Keese Michael, Post Stefan, Weiner Rudolf
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Obes Surg. 2009 Feb;19(2):230-236. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9661-1. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
BACKGROUND: The only effective treatment for patients with morbid obesity is surgery. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery has become quite popular in attempts to decrease the morbidity associated with laparotomy. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficiency by using SurgASSIST(R) for performing the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP). The variables were compared with the results using the standard laparoscopic circular end-to-end anastomotic stapler (CEEA(R)). METHODS: After randomization, the gastro-jejuostomy of RYGBP was performed in ten patients by transabdominal introduced circular stapler (group A) and in ten patients by transorally introduced circular stapler (SurgASSIST(R); group B) via five-port laparoscopy. A prospective 12-month postoperative follow-up including documentation of minor and major complication as well as weight loss and body composition is done every 8 weeks. RESULTS: The average body mass index (BMI, 52 kg/m(2)) and the other baseline characteristics were equally distributed in both groups. There was no difference in reduction of BMI, excess weight loss, and fat mass in both groups. The rate of port site wound infection in group A was significantly higher (p = 0.03) when compared to group B. There was no anastomotic leak or stricture postoperatively in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Performing of a gastrojejunostomy in RYGBP by SurgASSIST is a safe and feasible method in comparison to conventional circular stapler systems. The advantage of SurgASSIST is the avoidance to introduce the stapler through the abdominal wall and, by this, a possible port site wound infection. Further prospective studies have to be performed to verify the advantages of the SurgASSIST in comparison to conventional circular stapler systems.
背景:病态肥胖患者唯一有效的治疗方法是手术。腹腔镜减肥手术已颇受欢迎,旨在降低与剖腹手术相关的发病率。本研究的目的是评估使用SurgASSIST®在腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGBP)中进行胃肠吻合术的安全性和有效性。将这些变量与使用标准腹腔镜圆形端端吻合器(CEEA®)的结果进行比较。 方法:随机分组后,通过五孔腹腔镜,10例患者经腹引入圆形吻合器(A组),10例患者经口引入圆形吻合器(SurgASSIST®;B组)进行RYGBP的胃肠吻合术。术后进行为期12个月的前瞻性随访,每8周记录一次轻微和严重并发症以及体重减轻和身体成分情况。 结果:两组患者的平均体重指数(BMI,52kg/m²)和其他基线特征分布均衡。两组在BMI降低、超重减轻和脂肪量减少方面无差异。与B组相比,A组的切口部位伤口感染率显著更高(p = 0.03)。两组术后均未出现吻合口漏或狭窄。 结论:与传统圆形吻合器系统相比,使用SurgASSIST在RYGBP中进行胃肠吻合术是一种安全可行的方法。SurgASSIST的优点是避免将吻合器经腹壁引入,从而避免可能的切口部位伤口感染。与传统圆形吻合器系统相比,必须进行进一步的前瞻性研究以验证SurgASSIST的优势。
Surg Technol Int. 2005
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018-6
Obes Surg. 2013-1
N Engl J Med. 2007-8-23
Adv Surg. 2005
Obes Surg. 2004
Obes Surg. 2004-10
JAMA. 2004-10-13