• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用21毫米或25毫米圆形吻合器行腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后胃肠吻合口狭窄的发生率:一项随机前瞻性盲法研究

Incidence of gastroenterostomy stenosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using 21- or 25-mm circular stapler: a randomized prospective blinded study.

作者信息

Fisher Barry L, Atkinson James D, Cottam Daniel

机构信息

Surgical Weight Control Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):176-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.11.014. Epub 2007 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2006.11.014
PMID:17331806
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the most common bariatric procedure performed in the United States today. The most common early complication after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y is stenosis. No randomized studies have compared the effect of the different staplers on the incidence of stenosis or on long-term weight loss. We compared the anastomoses performed with the two sizes of circular stapler in common use.

METHODS

A total of 200 patients were randomized to undergo 21-mm (n = 100) or 25-mm (n = 100) circular stapled gastroenterostomy after induction of anesthesia. No other differences were allowed in the operative technique. Stenosis was defined as patient complaints of dysphagia leading to endoscopy within 10 weeks of surgery, in which a 9-mm diameter endoscope would not pass through the gastroenterostomy without dilation.

RESULTS

Of the 200 patients, 19 patients in the 21-mm group and 8 in the 25-mm group underwent endoscopy for symptoms (P = 0.027). Of the 19 and 8 patients, 17 and 7, respectively, had measurable stenosis at endoscopy (p = 0.035). Patients with a 21-mm anastomosis developed symptoms an average of 4.8 +/- 1.2 weeks after surgery, and those with a 25-mm anastomosis developed symptoms an average of 8.9 +/- 3.8 weeks postoperatively (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant difference in the stenosis rate between the 21-mm and 25-mm circular stapled anastomoses in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The 21-mm staplers led to significantly more endoscopies than did the 25-mm staplers. Symptoms leading to endoscopy occurred significantly later with use of a 25-mm stapler than after a 21-mm stapler.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术是目前美国最常见的减肥手术。腹腔镜Roux-en-Y术后最常见的早期并发症是狭窄。尚无随机研究比较不同吻合器对狭窄发生率或长期体重减轻的影响。我们比较了两种常用尺寸圆形吻合器所进行的吻合情况。

方法

总共200例患者在麻醉诱导后被随机分配接受21毫米(n = 100)或25毫米(n = 100)圆形吻合器行胃肠吻合术。手术技术上不允许有其他差异。狭窄定义为患者在术后10周内出现吞咽困难并导致内镜检查,此时直径9毫米的内镜在未扩张的情况下无法通过胃肠吻合口。

结果

200例患者中,21毫米组有19例、25毫米组有8例因症状接受了内镜检查(P = 0.027)。在这19例和8例患者中,分别有17例和7例在内镜检查时有可测量的狭窄(p = 0.035)。21毫米吻合口的患者术后平均4.8±1.2周出现症状,25毫米吻合口的患者术后平均8.9±3.8周出现症状(P<0.001)。

结论

我们发现在腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术中,21毫米和25毫米圆形吻合器吻合的狭窄率存在显著差异。21毫米吻合器导致的内镜检查明显多于25毫米吻合器。使用25毫米吻合器后导致内镜检查的症状出现时间明显晚于21毫米吻合器。

相似文献

1
Incidence of gastroenterostomy stenosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using 21- or 25-mm circular stapler: a randomized prospective blinded study.使用21毫米或25毫米圆形吻合器行腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后胃肠吻合口狭窄的发生率:一项随机前瞻性盲法研究
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):176-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.11.014. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
2
Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后胃空肠吻合术的并发症:21毫米和25毫米圆形吻合器的比较
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Sep-Oct;3(5):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
3
Gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: analysis of 1291 patients.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术后的胃空肠吻合口狭窄:1291例患者的分析
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Mar-Apr;2(2):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2005.10.014.
4
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with linear cutter technique: comparison of four-row versus six-row cartridge in creation of anastomosis.采用线性切割器技术的腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:四排钉仓与六排钉仓在吻合口创建中的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Jul-Aug;2(4):431-4. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.03.019.
5
Endoscopic balloon dilation of gastroenteric anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypass.腹腔镜胃旁路术后胃肠吻合口狭窄的内镜下球囊扩张术
Endoscopy. 2003 Sep;35(9):725-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41579.
6
Successful endoscopic management of gastrojejunal anastomotic strictures after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后胃空肠吻合口狭窄的内镜成功治疗
Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Aug;66(2):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.10.012. Epub 2007 Apr 23.
7
Experience with the circular stapler for the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic gastric bypass (350 cases).腹腔镜胃旁路术中使用圆形吻合器行胃空肠吻合术的经验(350例)
Obes Surg. 2005 Sep;15(8):1096-102. doi: 10.1381/0960892055002220.
8
Laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity with linear gastroenterostomy.采用线性胃肠吻合术的腹腔镜胃旁路手术治疗病态肥胖症。
Obes Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):360-3. doi: 10.1381/096089203765887660.
9
Stenosis of the gastroenterostomy after laparoscopic gastric bypass.腹腔镜胃旁路术后胃肠吻合口狭窄
Obes Surg. 2004 Apr;14(4):484-91. doi: 10.1381/096089204323013460.
10
Early results after laparoscopic gastric bypass: EEA vs GIA stapled gastrojejunal anastomosis.腹腔镜胃旁路术后早期结果:端端吻合器(EEA)与胃肠吻合器(GIA)吻合的胃空肠吻合术
Obes Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):355-9. doi: 10.1381/096089203765887651.

引用本文的文献

1
Metabolic/bariatric surgery optimization: a position statement by Arabic association for the study of diabetes and metabolism (AASD).代谢/减重手术优化:阿拉伯糖尿病与代谢研究协会(AASD)的立场声明
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Jan 29;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01564-w.
2
Integrated Insights into Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Improving Life Quality and Reducing Mortality in Obesity.代谢与减重手术综合见解:改善肥胖症患者生活质量并降低死亡率
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Dec 26;61(1):14. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010014.
3
Navigating Bariatric Surgery: Understanding and Managing Short-Term and Long-Term Complications.
肥胖症手术指南:了解并处理短期和长期并发症
Cureus. 2023 Nov 9;15(11):e48580. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48580. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Evaluating outcomes among surgeons who changed their technique for gastric bypass: a state-wide analysis from 2011 to 2021.评估胃旁路手术医生改变手术技术后的结果:2011 年至 2021 年的全州分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8464-8472. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10434-x. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
5
Effect of Circular Stapler Diameter on Anastomotic Leakage Rate and Stenosis After Open Total Gastrectomy With Esophagojejunostomy: A Substantive Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Series.圆形吻合器直径对开放全胃切除食管空肠吻合术后吻合口漏发生率及狭窄的影响:一项实质性回顾性倾向评分匹配系列研究
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Sep 7;3(3):e195. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000195. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Esophago-jejunal Anastomosis During Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in 72 Patients: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study in Poland.72 例胃癌全胃切除术中手工缝合与吻合器吻合食管空肠吻合术的术后结果比较:波兰单中心回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Jan 26;29:e938759. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938759.
7
A 30 mm sized gastrojejunostomy may lead to a lower rate of therapy failure in comparison to a 45 mm sized gastrojejunostomy following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后45毫米大小的胃空肠吻合术相比,30毫米大小的胃空肠吻合术可能导致更低的治疗失败率。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 May 16;78:103787. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103787. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Comparative evaluation of efficiency for gastroileostomy anastomosis in laparoscopic transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy between linear and circular staplers.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中转二分法中行胃回肠吻合术时线性吻合器与圆形吻合器效率的比较评估
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):199-206. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.107756. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
9
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)-a Mid-Term Cohort Study with 612 Patients.一种吻合口胃旁路-迷你胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)的中期队列研究:612 例患者。
Obes Surg. 2020 Apr;30(4):1230-1240. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04250-3.
10
Is it the technique or wound protection that is key to reducing wound infections in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures?是技术还是伤口保护对于减少 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术中的伤口感染至关重要?
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):2287-2294. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07022-3. Epub 2019 Jul 29.