Edholm David, Sundbom Magnus
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):1233-6. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
Although laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is a common bariatric procedure worldwide, no consensus on the optimal technique for the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) has been reached. Circular stapling (CS) immediately results in a GJ of standardized width, whereas linear stapling (LS) requires a technically challenging closure of the stapler defect. The aim was to study differences in outcomes between CS and LS.
Nationwide Swedish cohort.
The Scandinavian Obesity Registry (SOReg) included prospective data from 34,284 primary LRYGB patients operated on in 2007-2013. We studied operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and percent excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) after 1 year. Outcomes were assessed through multivariate analysis adjusting for gender, age, preoperative body mass index (BMI), and diabetes.
Preoperatively the groups were similar (40.9 yr, BMI 42.4 kg/m(2), 76% female). For CS and LS, operative time and hospital stay were 114 and 73 minutes (P<.001) and 4.6 and 2.0 days (P<.001), respectively. Using LS as a reference, adjusted odds ratio (OR) for CS patients to have anastomotic leakage was 2.8 (95% CI 1.5-5.0), postoperative hemorrhage 1.9 (95% CI 1.2-2.9), wound complication 9.7 (95% CI 6.8-13.9), and marginal ulcer 3.1 (95% CI 1.8-5.3). The %EBMIL at 1 year was 80% for both techniques and 31% of total weight was lost. Follow-up rate at 6 weeks and 1 year was 96% and 73%, respectively.
CS was found to be associated with disadvantages regarding operative time, hospital stay, and postoperative complications compared with LS.
尽管腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)是全球常见的减肥手术,但关于胃空肠吻合术(GJ)的最佳技术尚未达成共识。圆形吻合器吻合(CS)可立即形成标准化宽度的胃空肠吻合口,而线性吻合器吻合(LS)则需要对吻合器缺损进行技术要求较高的闭合。目的是研究CS和LS在手术结果上的差异。
瑞典全国队列。
斯堪的纳维亚肥胖登记处(SOReg)纳入了2007年至2013年接受初次LRYGB手术的34284例患者的前瞻性数据。我们研究了手术时间、住院时间、术后并发症以及1年后的超重体重指数降低百分比(%EBMIL)。通过对性别、年龄、术前体重指数(BMI)和糖尿病进行校正的多变量分析来评估结果。
术前两组相似(年龄40.9岁,BMI 42.4kg/m²,76%为女性)。对于CS组和LS组,手术时间分别为114分钟和73分钟(P<0.001),住院时间分别为4.6天和2.0天(P<0.001)。以LS组为参照,CS组患者发生吻合口漏的校正比值比(OR)为2.8(95%CI 1.5 - 5.0),术后出血的OR为1.9(95%CI 1.2 - 2.9),伤口并发症的OR为9.7(95%CI 6.8 - 13.9),边缘溃疡的OR为3.1(95%CI 1.8 - 5.3)。两种技术1年时的%EBMIL均为80%,总体重减轻了31%。6周和1年时的随访率分别为96%和73%。
与LS相比,CS在手术时间、住院时间和术后并发症方面存在劣势。