Suppr超能文献

平板运动评分对疑似冠心病门诊患者的预后价值

Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease.

作者信息

Mark D B, Shaw L, Harrell F E, Hlatky M A, Lee K L, Bengtson J R, McCants C B, Califf R M, Pryor D B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C. 27710.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1991 Sep 19;325(12):849-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199109193251204.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The treadmill exercise test identifies patients with different degrees of risk of death from cardiovascular events. We devised a prognostic score, based on the results of treadmill exercise testing, that accurately predicts outcome among inpatients referred for cardiac catheterization. This study was designed to determine whether this score could also accurately predict prognosis in unselected outpatients.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 613 consecutive outpatients with suspected coronary disease who were referred for exercise testing between 1983 and 1985. Follow-up was 98 percent complete at four years. The treadmill score was calculated as follows: duration of exercise in minutes--(5 x the maximal ST-segment deviation during or after exercise, in millimeters)--(4 x the treadmill angina index). The numerical treadmill angina index was 0 for no angina, 1 for nonlimiting angina, and 2 for exercise-limiting angina. Treadmill scores ranged from -25 (indicating the highest risk) to +15 (indicating the lowest risk).

RESULTS

Predicted outcomes for the outpatients, based on their treadmill scores, agreed closely with the observed outcomes. The score accurately separated patients who subsequently died from those who lived for four years (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve = 0.849). The treadmill score was a better discriminator than the clinical data and was even more useful for outpatients than it had been for inpatients. Approximately two thirds of the outpatients had treadmill scores indicating low risk (greater than or equal to +5), reflecting longer exercise times and little or no ST-segment deviation, and their four-year survival rate was 99 percent (average annual mortality rate, 0.25 percent). Four percent of the outpatients had scores indicating high risk (less than -10), reflecting shorter exercise times and more severe ST-segment deviation; their four-year survival rate was 79 percent (average annual mortality rate, 5 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

The treadmill score is a useful and valid tool that can help clinicians determine prognosis and decide whether to refer outpatients with suspected coronary disease for cardiac catheterization. In this study, it was a better predictor of outcome than the clinical assessment.

摘要

背景

跑步机运动试验可识别出具有不同程度心血管事件死亡风险的患者。我们基于跑步机运动试验的结果设计了一种预后评分,该评分能准确预测因心脏导管插入术而住院患者的预后。本研究旨在确定该评分是否也能准确预测未经挑选的门诊患者的预后。

方法

我们前瞻性地研究了1983年至1985年间连续转诊进行运动试验的613例疑似冠心病门诊患者。四年的随访完成率为98%。跑步机评分的计算方法如下:运动持续时间(分钟)-(5×运动期间或运动后最大ST段偏移,毫米)-(4×跑步机心绞痛指数)。跑步机心绞痛指数的数值,无症状性心绞痛为0,非限制性心绞痛为1,运动限制性心绞痛为2。跑步机评分范围为-25(表明最高风险)至+15(表明最低风险)。

结果

基于跑步机评分的门诊患者预测结果与观察到的结果密切相符。该评分能准确区分随后死亡的患者和存活四年的患者(受试者工作特征曲线下面积=0.849)。跑步机评分比临床数据具有更好的鉴别能力,对门诊患者甚至比对住院患者更有用。约三分之二的门诊患者跑步机评分表明低风险(大于或等于+5),反映运动时间较长且ST段偏移很小或无偏移,其四年生存率为99%(平均年死亡率为0.25%)。4%的门诊患者评分表明高风险(小于-10),反映运动时间较短且ST段偏移更严重;其四年生存率为79%(平均年死亡率为5%)。

结论

跑步机评分是一种有用且有效的工具,可帮助临床医生确定预后,并决定是否将疑似冠心病的门诊患者转诊进行心脏导管插入术。在本研究中,它比临床评估更能准确预测预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验