Suppr超能文献

PARMA 5计算机辅助口服抗凝剂剂量的多中心随机临床终点研究。

A multicentre randomised clinical endpoint study of PARMA 5 computer-assisted oral anticoagulant dosage.

作者信息

Poller Leon, Keown Michelle, Ibrahim Saied, Lowe Gordon, Moia Marco, Turpie Alexander G, Roberts Christopher, van den Besselaar Aton M H P, van der Meer Felix J M, Tripodi Armando, Palareti Gualtiero, Jespersen Jørgen

机构信息

EAA Central Facility, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2008 Oct;143(2):274-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07337.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

Abstract

To meet growing demand for oral anticoagulation worldwide there has been increased dependence on computer-assistance in dosage although the safety and effectiveness of any of the individual computer-assisted dosage programs has not previously been established. This randomised multicentre clinical end-point study assessed a new version of the PARMA 5 program. It compared PARMA 5 safety and effectiveness with manual dosage by experienced medical staff at 19 centres with a known interest in oral anticoagulation. Target recruitment was 8000 patient-years, randomised to medical staff or PARMA-5 assisted dosage. Safety and effectiveness of the PARMA 5 program was compared with manual dosage. A total of 10,421 patients were recruited (15,369 patient-years) in the 5-year study. International normalised ratio (INR) tests numbered 167,791 with manual and 160,078 with PARMA 5 dosage. With parma 5 there was overall a non-significant reduction in clinical events but in the 2542 patients with deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, clinical events were significantly reduced (P = 0.005). Success in achieving 'time in target INR range' was also significantly greater with PARMA 5 compared with the dosage by experienced medical staff. This study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of PARMA 5-assisted dosage.

摘要

为满足全球对抗凝药物日益增长的需求,人们越来越依赖计算机辅助来确定剂量,尽管此前尚未证实任何一种计算机辅助剂量程序的安全性和有效性。这项随机多中心临床终点研究评估了PARMA 5程序的新版本。它将PARMA 5的安全性和有效性与19个对口服抗凝药物感兴趣的中心的经验丰富的医务人员手动给药进行了比较。目标招募量为8000患者年,随机分为医务人员给药组或PARMA - 5辅助给药组。将PARMA 5程序的安全性和有效性与手动给药进行了比较。在为期5年的研究中,共招募了10421名患者(15369患者年)。国际标准化比值(INR)检测中,手动给药组有167791次,PARMA 5给药组有160078次。使用PARMA 5时,总体临床事件有非显著性减少,但在2542例深静脉血栓形成/肺栓塞患者中,临床事件显著减少(P = 0.005)。与经验丰富的医务人员给药相比,PARMA 5在实现“INR处于目标范围内的时间”方面也显著更成功。这项研究证明了PARMA 5辅助给药的安全性和有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验