Suppr超能文献

在结肠镜检查期间,同行参与可能会提高腺瘤检出率。

Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy.

作者信息

Rogart Jason N, Siddiqui Uzma D, Jamidar Priya A, Aslanian Harry R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8019, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2841-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02085.x. Epub 2008 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is increasingly used as a quality indicator for screening/surveillance colonoscopy. Recent investigations to identify factors that affect ADR have focused on the technical aspects of the procedure or the equipment.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether gastroenterology (GI) fellow participation during colonoscopy affects ADR.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of data prospectively collected on 309 patients enrolled in a different study not involving polyp detection. In total, 126 colonoscopies were performed by a GI attending alone, and 183 by a GI fellow supervised by one of the same four GI attendings.

RESULTS

The ADR was significantly higher when a fellow was involved (37% vs 23%, P < 0.01), as was the total number of adenomas detected (0.56 per patient vs 0.30 per patient, P < 0.05). The percentage of patients with two and three or more adenomas was also higher for fellows versus attendings alone (13.1% vs 5.6%, and 6% vs 1.6%, respectively; P < 0.05), though there was no difference in the detection of advanced adenomas (7.1% vs 5.6%, P = 0.16). The adenomas detected when fellows participated were smaller (mean size 4.4 mm vs 5.8 mm, P < 0.05), and more likely to be sessile (80.6% vs 64.9%, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the age, gender, indication for colonoscopy, or procedure time for the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, fellow involvement in colonoscopy may increase not only the ADR, but also the detection of more subtle adenomas. Further investigation into whether this is a "fellow effect," or simply a matter of more efficient visual scanning and recognition with two people, should be considered.

摘要

背景

腺瘤检出率(ADR)越来越多地被用作筛查/监测结肠镜检查的质量指标。最近旨在确定影响ADR的因素的研究主要集中在检查过程或设备的技术方面。

目的

评估结肠镜检查期间胃肠病学(GI)专科住院医师的参与是否会影响ADR。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,数据来自于另一项不涉及息肉检测的研究中前瞻性收集的309例患者。总共,126例结肠镜检查由一名GI主治医师单独完成,183例由一名GI专科住院医师在同四位GI主治医师之一的监督下完成。

结果

有专科住院医师参与时ADR显著更高(37%对23%,P<0.01),检测到的腺瘤总数也是如此(每位患者0.56个对每位患者0.30个,P<0.05)。有两个腺瘤以及三个或更多腺瘤的患者百分比,专科住院医师组也高于仅由主治医师操作的组(分别为13.1%对5.6%,以及6%对1.6%;P<0.05),不过在高级别腺瘤的检测上没有差异(7.1%对5.6%,P=0.16)。专科住院医师参与时检测到的腺瘤较小(平均大小4.4毫米对5.8毫米,P<0.05),并且更可能是无蒂的(80.6%对64.9%,P<0.05)。两组在年龄、性别、结肠镜检查指征或操作时间方面没有显著差异。

结论

在这项回顾性研究中,专科住院医师参与结肠镜检查不仅可能提高ADR,还可能增加对更微小腺瘤的检测。应考虑进一步研究这是“专科住院医师效应”,还是仅仅因为两人进行视觉扫描和识别更高效的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验