• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无蒂锯齿状病变的检出率持续上升:2008 - 2020年。

Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008-2020.

作者信息

Edwardson Nicholas, Adsul Prajakta, Gonzalez Zorisadday, Pankratz V Shane, Parasher Gulshan, English Kevin, Mishra Shiraz

机构信息

University of New Mexico, School of Public Administration, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.

University of New Mexico, Department of Internal Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2023 Jan 26;11(1):E107-E116. doi: 10.1055/a-1990-0509. eCollection 2023 Jan.

DOI:10.1055/a-1990-0509
PMID:36712908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9879655/
Abstract

We assessed sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) at a large academic medical center from 2008 to 2020 and modeled a local, aspirational target SSLDR. We also assessed SSLDRs among all gastroenterology fellows to better understand the relationship between SSLDRs and total colonoscopies performed. SSL-positive pathology results were flagged from a dataset composed of all screening colonoscopies for average-risk patients from 2008 to 2020. Unadjusted SSLDRs were calculated for individual endoscopists by year. A mixed effects logistic regression was used to estimate the log odds of SSL detection, with one model estimating division-wide predictors of SSL detection and a second model focused exclusively on colonoscopies performed by fellows. Model-adjusted SSLDRs were estimated for all 13 years and across both categories of all endoscopists and fellows only. Adjusted SSLDRs showed a consistent improvement in SSLDR from a low of 0.37 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.63) in 2008 to a high of 7.94 % (95 % CI: 6.34-9.54) in 2020. Among fellows only, the odds of SSL detection were significantly lower during their first year compared to their second year (OR: 0.80, 95 % CI: 0.66-0.98) but not significantly higher in their third year compared to their second year (OR: 1.09, 95 % CI: 0.85-1.4). SSLDR increased steadily and significantly throughout our study period but variance among endoscopists persists. The peak SSLDR from 2020 of 7.94 % should serve as the local aspirational target for this division's attendings and fellows but should be continuously reevaluated.

摘要

我们评估了2008年至2020年期间一家大型学术医疗中心的无蒂锯齿状病变检出率(SSLDR),并建立了一个本地的、理想的目标SSLDR模型。我们还评估了所有胃肠病学研究员的SSLDR,以更好地了解SSLDR与所进行的全结肠镜检查总数之间的关系。SSL阳性病理结果从2008年至2020年所有平均风险患者的筛查结肠镜检查数据集中标出。按年份计算了个体内镜医师的未调整SSLDR。使用混合效应逻辑回归来估计SSL检测的对数几率,一个模型估计全科室SSL检测的预测因素,另一个模型专门关注研究员进行的结肠镜检查。仅针对所有13年以及所有内镜医师和研究员这两类人群估计了模型调整后的SSLDR。调整后的SSLDR显示出从2008年的低水平0.37%(95%置信区间[CI]:0.10 - 0.63)持续提高到2020年的高水平7.94%(95%CI:6.34 - 9.54)。仅在研究员中,与第二年相比,他们第一年检测到SSL的几率显著更低(OR:0.80,95%CI:0.66 - 0.98),但与第二年相比,第三年并没有显著更高(OR:1.09,95%CI:0.85 - 1.4)。在我们的研究期间,SSLDR稳步且显著增加,但内镜医师之间的差异仍然存在。2020年7.94%的SSLDR峰值应作为该科室主治医师和研究员的本地理想目标,但应持续重新评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/9879655/121e1e405423/10-1055-a-1990-0509-i2798ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/9879655/a5beffaf5744/10-1055-a-1990-0509-i2798ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/9879655/eb9402a94064/10-1055-a-1990-0509-i2798ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/9879655/56ec1389333d/10-1055-a-1990-0509-i2798ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/9879655/121e1e405423/10-1055-a-1990-0509-i2798ei4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/9879655/a5beffaf5744/10-1055-a-1990-0509-i2798ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/9879655/eb9402a94064/10-1055-a-1990-0509-i2798ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/9879655/56ec1389333d/10-1055-a-1990-0509-i2798ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a09/9879655/121e1e405423/10-1055-a-1990-0509-i2798ei4.jpg

相似文献

1
Sessile serrated lesion detection rates continue to increase: 2008-2020.无蒂锯齿状病变的检出率持续上升:2008 - 2020年。
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Jan 26;11(1):E107-E116. doi: 10.1055/a-1990-0509. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates.患者和医生因素与腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状病变检出率的关系。
Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Nov;65(11):3123-3131. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06419-8. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
3
Higher adenoma detection, sessile serrated lesion detection and proximal sessile serrated lesion detection are associated with physician specialty and performance on Direct Observation of Procedural Skills.腺瘤检出率、无蒂锯齿状病变检出率和近端无蒂锯齿状病变检出率与医生专业和直接观察操作技能表现相关。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000677.
4
Trends in Detection of Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesions Over a Decade in a Community-Based Healthcare System.在一个社区医疗保健系统中,十年来腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状病变检测趋势的研究。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;15(3):e00683. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000683.
5
Most large colorectal polyps missed by gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy are sessile serrated lesions.胃肠病学进修医生在结肠镜检查时漏诊的大多数大肠大息肉是无蒂锯齿状病变。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E659-E663. doi: 10.1055/a-1784-0959. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Variation Over Time and Factors Associated With Detection Rates of Sessile Serrated Lesion Across the United States: Results Form a National Sample Using the GIQuIC Registry.美国固有锯齿状病变检出率随时间的变化及相关因素:利用 GIQuIC 登记处进行全国抽样的结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 1;116(1):95-99. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000824.
7
Higher Serrated Polyp Detection Rates Are Associated With Lower Risk of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer: Data From the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.高锯齿状息肉检出率与结肠镜检查后结直肠癌风险降低相关:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的数据。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 1;118(11):1927-1930. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002403. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
8
Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.平均风险筛查结肠镜检查中无蒂锯齿状病变的检出率:对已发表文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E610-E620. doi: 10.1055/a-1352-4095. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
9
Association between endoscopist adenoma detection rate and serrated polyp detection: Retrospective analysis of over 200,000 screening colonoscopies.内镜医师腺瘤检出率与锯齿状息肉检出之间的关联:对20多万例结肠镜筛查的回顾性分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Apr 5;12(4):E488-E497. doi: 10.1055/a-2271-1929. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates.进修水平提高腺瘤检出率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 May;8(5):439-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.01.013. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing ChatGPT3.5 and Bard recommendations for colonoscopy intervals: Bridging the gap in healthcare settings.比较ChatGPT3.5和Bard关于结肠镜检查间隔的建议:弥合医疗环境中的差距。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jun 17;13:a25865912. doi: 10.1055/a-2586-5912. eCollection 2025.
2
Trends in and factors associated with family physician-performed screening colonoscopies in the United States: 2016-2021.2016 - 2021年美国家庭医生进行结肠镜筛查的趋势及相关因素
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12858. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12858. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
A computer-aided detection system in the everyday setting of diagnostic, screening, and surveillance colonoscopy: an international, randomized trial.

本文引用的文献

1
A Polyp Worth Removing: A Paradigm for Measuring Colonoscopy Quality and Performance of Novel Technologies for Polyp Detection.值得切除的息肉:用于测量结肠镜检查质量和新型息肉检测技术性能的范例。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 1;55(9):733-739. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001594.
2
Sessile serrated lesions: Searching for the true prevalence.无蒂锯齿状病变:探寻真实患病率
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E635-E636. doi: 10.1055/a-1373-4825. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.
日常诊断、筛查和监测结肠镜检查中计算机辅助检测系统的应用:一项国际、随机试验。
Endoscopy. 2024 Nov;56(11):843-850. doi: 10.1055/a-2328-2844. Epub 2024 May 15.
4
Verification of the increase in concomitant dysplasia and cancer with the size of sessile serrated lesions.伴发发育异常和癌症的发生率随无蒂锯齿状病变大小增加的验证。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Mar 28;12(3):E448-E455. doi: 10.1055/a-2246-0820. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Trends in Detection of Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesions Over a Decade in a Community-Based Healthcare System.在一个社区医疗保健系统中,十年来腺瘤和无蒂锯齿状病变检测趋势的研究。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;15(3):e00683. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000683.
平均风险筛查结肠镜检查中无蒂锯齿状病变的检出率:对已发表文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E610-E620. doi: 10.1055/a-1352-4095. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021.ACG 临床指南:结直肠癌筛查 2021 年版。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Mar 1;116(3):458-479. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122.
5
Rate of detection of serrated lesions at colonoscopy in an average-risk population: a meta-analysis of 129,001 individuals.普通风险人群结肠镜检查时锯齿状病变的检出率:对129,001例个体的荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E472-E481. doi: 10.1055/a-1333-1776. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
7
Do Water-aided Techniques Improve Serrated Polyp Detection Rate During Colonoscopy?: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.水辅助技术是否能提高结肠镜检查中锯齿状息肉的检出率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 1;55(6):520-527. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001386.
8
Comparing endoscopic interventions to improve serrated adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.比较内镜干预措施以提高结肠镜检查期间锯齿状腺瘤检出率:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;32(10):1284-1292. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001844.
9
Molecular Biomarkers of Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyps.无柄锯齿状腺瘤/息肉的分子标志物。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec;10(12):e00104. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000104.
10
Screening Relevance of Sessile Serrated Polyps.无蒂锯齿状息肉的筛查相关性
Clin Endosc. 2019 May;52(3):235-238. doi: 10.5946/ce.2018.112. Epub 2019 Jan 8.