McDonald Skye, Tate Robyn, Togher Leanne, Bornhofen Cristina, Long Esther, Gertler Paul, Bowen Rebecca
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1648-59. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.029.
To determine whether social skills deficits including unskilled, inappropriate behavior, problems reading social cues (social perception), and mood disturbances (such as depression and anxiety) could be remediated after severe traumatic brain injuries.
Randomized controlled trial comparing a social skills program with social activity alone or with waitlist control. Several participants were reassigned after randomization.
Hospital outpatient and community facilities.
Fifty-one outpatients from 3 brain injury units in Sydney, Australia, with severe, chronic acquired brain injuries were recruited. A total of 39 people (13 in skills training, 13 in social activity, 13 in waitlist) completed all phases of the study.
Twelve-week social skills treatment program encompassing weekly 3-hour group sessions focused on shaping social behavior and remediating social perception and 1-hour individual sessions to address psychologic issues with mood, self-esteem, etc.
Primary outcomes were: (1) social behavior during encounters with a confederate as rated on the Behaviorally Referenced Rating System of Intermediary Social Skills-Revised (BRISS-R), (2) social perception as measured by The Awareness of Social Inference Test, and (3) depression and anxiety as measured by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. Secondary outcomes were: relative report on social behavior and participation using: the Katz Adjustment Scale-R1; the Social Performance Survey Schedule; the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire; and the Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale (both relative and self-report).
Repeated-measures analysis of variance indicated that social activity alone did not lead to improved performance relative to waitlist (placebo effect) on any outcome variable. On the other hand, the skills training group improved differentially on the Partner Directed Behavior Scale of the BRISS-R, specifically the self-centered behavior and partner involvement behavior subscales. No treatment effects were found for the remaining primary outcomes (social perception, emotional adjustment) or for secondary outcome variables (relative and self-report measures of social function).
This study suggested that treatment effects after social skills training in people with severe, chronic brain injuries are modest and are limited to direct measures of social behavior.
确定严重创伤性脑损伤后,包括不熟练、不适当行为、解读社交线索(社会认知)问题以及情绪障碍(如抑郁和焦虑)在内的社交技能缺陷是否能够得到改善。
随机对照试验,将社交技能项目与单纯社交活动或等待名单对照进行比较。随机分组后重新分配了若干参与者。
医院门诊和社区设施。
招募了来自澳大利亚悉尼3个脑损伤科室的51名门诊患者,他们患有严重的慢性获得性脑损伤。共有39人(13人接受技能训练,13人参与社交活动,13人在等待名单组)完成了研究的所有阶段。
为期12周的社交技能治疗项目,包括每周3小时的小组课程,重点是塑造社交行为和改善社会认知,以及1小时的个人课程,以解决情绪、自尊等心理问题。
主要结局为:(1)在与一名同谋者互动期间的社交行为,根据修订后的中介社交技能行为参考评分系统(BRISS-R)进行评分;(2)通过社会推理意识测试测量的社会认知;(3)通过抑郁、焦虑和压力量表测量的抑郁和焦虑。次要结局为:使用以下工具对社交行为和参与情况的相关报告:卡茨适应量表-R1;社会表现调查时间表;拉筹伯沟通问卷;以及悉尼心理社会重新融入量表(相关报告和自我报告)。
重复测量方差分析表明,相对于等待名单(安慰剂效应),单纯社交活动在任何结局变量上均未导致表现改善。另一方面,技能训练组在BRISS-R的伙伴指导行为量表上有差异地改善,特别是以自我为中心的行为和伙伴参与行为子量表。其余主要结局(社会认知、情绪调整)或次要结局变量(社交功能的相关报告和自我报告测量)未发现治疗效果。
本研究表明,严重慢性脑损伤患者进行社交技能训练后的治疗效果有限,且仅限于社交行为的直接测量。