Hale Leigh A, Pal Jaya, Becker Ines
REAL Neurology Research Group, Centre for Physiotherapy Research and School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1765-71. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.027.
To investigate the reliability, validity, and utility of a triaxial accelerometer to measure physical activity in the free-living environment in adults with and without neurologic dysfunction.
Repeated-measures design.
General community.
Volunteer sample of 17 men and 30 women (age range, 28-91y) living in the community with stroke of greater than 6 months in duration (n=20), Parkinson disease (n=7), or multiple sclerosis (n=11), and healthy but sedentary controls (n=9).
Not applicable.
Physical activity measured with the TriTrac RT3 accelerometer, 7-day recall questionnaire, and activity diary.
The accelerometer reliably measured free-living physical activity (intraclass correlation coefficient, .85; 95% confidence interval, .74-.91; P=.000). The standard error of measurement indicated that a second test would differ from a baseline test by +/-23%. Mean daily RT3 data collected in the first 3 days differed significantly from that of the mean daily RT3 data collected over 7 days. The RT3 appeared to distinguish level of mobility better than the 7-day recall questionnaire, and participants found the RT3 to be a user-friendly and acceptable measure of physical activity.
The triaxial accelerometer provided a stable measure of free-living physical activity, was found to distinguish between people with varying levels of mobility, and was well tolerated by participants. The results indicate that collecting data for 3 days was not reflective of data collected over 7 days.
研究三轴加速度计在测量有或无神经功能障碍的成年人自由生活环境中的身体活动时的可靠性、有效性和实用性。
重复测量设计。
普通社区。
17名男性和30名女性(年龄范围28 - 91岁)的志愿者样本,其中包括社区中病程超过6个月的中风患者(n = 20)、帕金森病患者(n = 7)、多发性硬化症患者(n = 11),以及健康但久坐不动的对照组(n = 9)。
不适用。
使用TriTrac RT3加速度计、7天回忆问卷和活动日记测量身体活动。
加速度计可靠地测量了自由生活中的身体活动(组内相关系数为0.85;95%置信区间为0.74 - 0.91;P = 0.000)。测量标准误差表明,第二次测试与基线测试的差异为±23%。前3天收集的平均每日RT3数据与7天收集的平均每日RT3数据有显著差异。RT3似乎比7天回忆问卷能更好地区分活动水平,并且参与者发现RT3是一种用户友好且可接受的身体活动测量方法。
三轴加速度计为自由生活中的身体活动提供了稳定的测量方法,能够区分不同活动水平的人群,并且参与者耐受性良好。结果表明,收集3天的数据不能反映7天收集的数据情况。