Steele B G, Holt L, Belza B, Ferris S, Lakshminaryan S, Buchner D M
Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health, University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA 98108, USA.
Chest. 2000 May;117(5):1359-67. doi: 10.1378/chest.117.5.1359.
To determine the reliability, validity, and stability of a triaxial accelerometer for walking and daily activity measurement in a COPD sample.
Cross-sectional, correlational, descriptive design.
Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program in a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center.
Forty-seven outpatients (44 men and 3 women) with stable COPD (FEV(1), 37% predicted; SD, 16%) prior to entry into a pulmonary rehabilitation program.
Test-retest reliability of a triaxial movement sensor (Tritrac R3D Research Ergometer; Professional Products; Madison, WI) was evaluated in 35 of the 47 subjects during three standardized 6-min walks (intraclass correlation coefficient [rICC] = 0.84). Pearson correlations evaluated accelerometer concurrent validity as a measure of walking (in vector magnitude units), compared to walking distance in all 47 subjects during three sequential 6-min walks (0. 84, 0.85, and 0.95, respectively; p < 0.001). The validity of the accelerometer as a measure of daily activity over 3 full days at home was evaluated in all subjects using Pearson correlations with other indicators of functional capacity. The accelerometer correlated with exercise capacity (maximal 6-min walk, r = 0.74; p < 0.001); level of obstructive disease (FEV(1) percent predicted, r = 0.62; p < 0.001); dyspnea (Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire, dyspnea over the past 30 days, r = - 0.29; p < 0.05); and activity self-efficacy (Activity Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, r = 0.43; p < 0.01); but not with self-report of daily activity (Modified Activity Recall Questionnaire, r = 0.14; not significant). Stability of the accelerometer to measure 3 full days of activity at home was determined by an rICC of 0.69.
This study provides preliminary data suggesting that a triaxial movement sensor is a reliable, valid, and stable measure of walking and daily physical activity in COPD patients. It has the potential to provide more precise measurement of everyday physical functioning in this population than self-report measures currently in use, and measures an important dimension of functional status not previously well-described.
确定用于测量慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者步行和日常活动的三轴加速度计的可靠性、有效性和稳定性。
横断面、相关性、描述性设计。
一所大学附属退伍军人事务医疗中心的门诊肺康复项目。
47名门诊患者(44名男性和3名女性),在进入肺康复项目之前患有稳定期COPD(第1秒用力呼气容积[FEV₁],预计值的37%;标准差,16%)。
在47名受试者中的35名受试者进行三次标准化的6分钟步行期间,评估了三轴运动传感器(Tritrac R3D研究测力计;专业产品公司;威斯康星州麦迪逊)的重测可靠性(组内相关系数[rICC]=0.84)。在47名受试者进行的三次连续6分钟步行期间,将加速度计作为步行测量指标(以矢量大小单位)的同时效度与步行距离进行Pearson相关性评估(分别为0.84、0.85和0.95;p<0.001)。使用Pearson相关性与其他功能能力指标,在所有受试者中评估加速度计作为在家中3整天日常活动测量指标的有效性。加速度计与运动能力(最大6分钟步行,r=0.74;p<0.001)、阻塞性疾病程度(FEV₁预计值百分比,r=0.62;p<0.001)、呼吸困难(功能状态和呼吸困难问卷,过去30天的呼吸困难程度,r=-0.29;p<0.05)以及活动自我效能感(活动自我效能量表,r=0.43;p<0.01)相关;但与日常活动的自我报告(改良活动回忆问卷,r=0.14;无显著性差异)无关。加速度计测量在家中3整天活动的稳定性通过rICC为0.69确定。
本研究提供的初步数据表明,三轴运动传感器是测量COPD患者步行和日常身体活动的可靠、有效和稳定的指标。与目前使用的自我报告测量方法相比,它有可能更精确地测量该人群的日常身体功能,并测量了一个以前未得到充分描述的功能状态的重要维度。