• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区健康行动模式:社区促进健康。

Community Health Action Model: health promotion by the community.

作者信息

Racher Frances E, Annis Robert C

机构信息

Brandon University, School of Health Studies, Brandon, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008;22(3):182-91.

PMID:18763474
Abstract

The goal of the Community Health Action (CHA) model is to depict community health promotion processes in a manner that can be implemented by community members to achieve their collectively and collaboratively determined actions and outcomes to sustain or improve the health and well-being of their community; the community as a whole, for the benefit of all. The model is unique in its ability to merge the community development process with a compatible community assessment, planning, implementation, and evaluation framework. The CHA model supports community participation leading to community-engaged assessment and change. In this article, the CHA model is depicted, its genesis described, and its utility demonstrated.

摘要

社区健康行动(CHA)模式的目标是以一种社区成员能够实施的方式来描述社区健康促进过程,以实现他们共同协作确定的行动和成果,从而维持或改善其社区的健康和福祉;为了全体居民的利益,整个社区都能从中受益。该模式的独特之处在于能够将社区发展过程与一个与之相适配的社区评估、规划、实施和评价框架相结合。CHA模式支持社区参与,从而实现社区参与式评估和变革。在本文中,将对CHA模式进行描述,阐述其起源,并展示其效用。

相似文献

1
Community Health Action Model: health promotion by the community.社区健康行动模式:社区促进健康。
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008;22(3):182-91.
2
Participatory rural appraisal techniques in disenfranchised communities: a Kenyan case study.被剥夺权利社区中的参与式农村评估技术:肯尼亚案例研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2006 Sep;53(3):178-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2006.00489.x.
3
Community partnerships: translating research for community development.社区伙伴关系:将研究成果转化为社区发展动力。
Can J Nurs Res. 2005 Mar;37(1):169-75.
4
Applying community-based participatory research methods to improve maternal and child health in Karachi, Pakistan.运用以社区为基础的参与式研究方法改善巴基斯坦卡拉奇的母婴健康。
Nurs Outlook. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):204-9. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2009.01.003.
5
Community health nurses in action: a case study from Jordan.行动中的社区健康护士:来自约旦的案例研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2007 Jun;54(2):204-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00542.x.
6
Collaboration with city agencies: a winning approach to community assessment.
J Nurs Educ. 2005 Jul;44(7):323-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20050701-07.
7
Community readiness to prevent intimate partner violence in Bexar County, Texas.德克萨斯州贝克斯县社区预防亲密伴侣暴力的准备情况。
J Transcult Nurs. 2003 Jul;14(3):227-36. doi: 10.1177/1043659603014003009.
8
Rural community leaders' perceptions of environmental health risks: improving community health.农村社区领导者对环境卫生风险的认知:改善社区健康状况
AAOHN J. 2006 Mar;54(3):105-12.
9
Community participation in a rural community health trust: the case of Lawrence, New Zealand.农村社区卫生信托中的社区参与:以新西兰劳伦斯为例。
Health Promot Int. 2003 Sep;18(3):189-97. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dag014.
10
Use of a university-community collaboration model to frame issues and set an agenda for strengthening a community.运用大学与社区合作模式来界定问题并制定加强社区建设的议程。
Health Promot Pract. 2003 Oct;4(4):385-92. doi: 10.1177/1524839903255467.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternative community-led intervention to improve uptake of cataract surgery services in rural Tanzania-The Dodoma Community Cataract Acceptance Trial (DoCCAT): a protocol for intervention co-designing and implementation in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.在坦桑尼亚农村地区改善白内障手术服务接受率的替代性社区主导干预措施——多多马社区白内障接受度试验(DoCCAT):一项在整群随机对照试验中进行干预共同设计与实施的方案
Biol Methods Protoc. 2024 Mar 8;9(1):bpae016. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae016. eCollection 2024.
2
A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study.公共卫生干预措施实施和评估框架综述,以促进共同创造:健康级联研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Mar 28;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01126-6.
3
Improving learning about familial risks using a multicomponent approach: the GRACE program.采用多组分方法提高对家族风险的认知:GRACE项目
Per Med. 2013 Jan 1;10(1):35-44. doi: 10.2217/pme.12.107.