• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在社区危机稳定单元接受治疗后的患者结局。

Patient outcome after treatment in a community-based crisis stabilization unit.

作者信息

Adams Charlotte L, El-Mallakh Rif S

机构信息

University of Louisville School of Nursing, Louisville, KY, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2009 Jul;36(3):396-9. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9141-3. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11414-008-9141-3
PMID:18766444
Abstract

Community-based residential treatment for acute psychiatric crisis has been proposed as an alternative to inpatient hospitalization, but there is a dearth of adequate outcome studies. We examined naturalistic symptomatic and treatment outcomes in patients admitted to a residential crisis treatment program. The 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale score dropped from moderately ill (40.5 +/- SD 8.25 points) on admission to mildly ill at discharge (28.7 +/- 11.37 points, t = 10.02, P < 0.0001). Beck's Depression Inventory also improved greatly, from a significant level of depression of 29.5 +/- 11.41 points on admission, to a nearly euthymic level of 10.1 +/- 8.60 points at discharge (a difference of 19.4 +/- 12.10 points, t = 12.5, P < 0.0001). The current study is limited by the lack of a matched comparison group of hospitalized patients. Nonetheless, community-based crisis stabilization units appear to be cost-effective alternatives to inpatient hospitalization for selected patients.

摘要

基于社区的急性精神危机住院治疗已被提议作为住院治疗的替代方案,但缺乏足够的疗效研究。我们研究了入住危机住院治疗项目的患者的自然症状和治疗结果。24项简明精神病评定量表评分从入院时的中度疾病(40.5±标准差8.25分)降至出院时的轻度疾病(28.7±11.37分,t = 10.02,P < 0.0001)。贝克抑郁量表也有显著改善,从入院时显著的抑郁水平29.5±11.41分降至出院时接近正常情绪水平的10.1±8.60分(差异为19.4±12.10分,t = 12.5,P < 0.0001)。本研究因缺乏住院患者的匹配对照组而受到限制。尽管如此,基于社区的危机稳定单元对于部分患者而言似乎是比住院治疗更具成本效益的替代方案。

相似文献

1
Patient outcome after treatment in a community-based crisis stabilization unit.在社区危机稳定单元接受治疗后的患者结局。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2009 Jul;36(3):396-9. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9141-3. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
2
A retrospective quasi-experimental study of a community crisis house for patients with severe and persistent mental illness.回顾性准实验研究:社区危机干预房对严重和持续性精神疾病患者的影响。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;47(7):667-75. doi: 10.1177/0004867413484369. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
3
Randomized trial of general hospital and residential alternative care for patients with severe and persistent mental illness.针对严重且持续性精神疾病患者的综合医院与寄宿替代护理的随机试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;155(4):516-22. doi: 10.1176/ajp.155.4.516.
4
Admission decisions following contact with an emergency mental health assessment and intervention service.在与紧急心理健康评估和干预服务机构接触后做出的入院决定。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1313-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01302.x.
5
Assessing the impact of community-based mobile crisis services on preventing hospitalization.评估基于社区的移动危机服务对预防住院的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Feb;52(2):223-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.2.223.
6
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
7
Day hospital/crisis respite care versus inpatient care, Part I: Clinical outcomes.日间医院/危机缓解护理与住院护理,第一部分:临床结果。
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Aug;153(8):1065-73. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.8.1065.
8
Day hospital/crisis respite care versus inpatient care, Part II: Service utilization and costs.日间医院/危机缓解护理与住院护理,第二部分:服务利用与成本
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Aug;153(8):1074-83. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.8.1074.
9
Interrater reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale used at a community-based inpatient crisis stabilization unit.基于社区的住院危机稳定单元使用的简明精神病评定量表的评定者间信度。
J Clin Psychol. 2000 Apr;56(4):583-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(200004)56:4<583::aid-jclp12>3.0.co;2-u.
10
Residential crisis services: a review.住宅危机服务:综述
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988 Oct;39(10):1095-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.39.10.1095.

引用本文的文献

1
THRIVE: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Social Validity of a Brief Recovery-Focused Intervention in Crisis Stabilization Centers.THRIVE:危机稳定中心简短的以康复为重点干预措施的可行性、可接受性和社会效度
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Jun;55(3):e70021. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70021.
2
Arkansas crisis stabilization unit guests: Baseline characteristics from a longitudinal cohort study.阿肯色州危机稳定单元访客:一项纵向队列研究的基线特征
Psychol Serv. 2025 May;22(2):304-311. doi: 10.1037/ser0000893. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
Study protocol paper for the multi-site feasibility evaluation of mobile and technology-assisted aftercare services for crisis stabilization units.

本文引用的文献

1
No end in sight. Healthcare tab hits record level, share of economy.看不到尽头。医疗保健支出达到创纪录水平,占经济的份额。
Mod Healthc. 2006 Jan 16;36(3):8-9.
2
A randomized controlled trial of integrated versus parallel housing services for homeless adults with severe mental illness.一项针对患有严重精神疾病的无家可归成年人的综合住房服务与并行住房服务的随机对照试验。
Schizophr Bull. 2004;30(4):969-82. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007146.
3
Assertive outreach teams in London: patient characteristics and outcomes. Pan-London Assertive Outreach Study, part 3.
危机稳定单元移动及技术辅助后续照护服务多地点可行性评估的研究方案文件
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 Jul 31;9(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01361-8.
4
Early Learning From a Low-Resource COVID-Response Virtual Mental Health Crisis Ward: Mixed Methods Study.来自资源匮乏地区新冠应对虚拟心理健康危机病房的早期经验:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 4;6(11):e39861. doi: 10.2196/39861.
5
Crisis stabilization units for jail diversion: A preliminary assessment of patient characteristics and outcomes.监狱转介危机稳定单位:患者特征和结果的初步评估。
Psychol Serv. 2022 Nov;19(4):630-636. doi: 10.1037/ser0000616. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
6
Emotional crisis in a naturalistic context: characterizing outpatient profiles and treatment effectiveness.自然主义背景下的情绪危机:门诊患者特征及治疗效果分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 7;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1293-3.
7
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (version 4.0) factorial structure and its sensitivity in the treatment of outpatients with unipolar depression.简明精神病评定量表(第4.0版)的因子结构及其在单相抑郁症门诊患者治疗中的敏感性。
Psychiatry Res. 2013 Dec 15;210(2):626-33. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
8
The impact of a mental health crisis respite upon clients' symptom distress.心理健康危机缓解对客户症状困扰的影响。
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Aug;49(4):433-7. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9523-0. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
伦敦的积极外展团队:患者特征与治疗结果。泛伦敦积极外展研究,第3部分。
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;183:148-54. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.2.148.
4
Medicaid expenditures on behavioral health care.医疗补助计划在行为健康护理方面的支出。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Feb;54(2):188-94. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.2.188.
5
Moving assertive community treatment into standard practice.将积极社区治疗纳入标准实践。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jun;52(6):771-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.6.771.