Skupień Elzbieta, Kowanetz Małgorzata
Z Zakładu Psychologii Sadowej Instytutu Ekspertyz Sadowych im. Prof. Jana Sehna w Krakowie.
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2008 Jan-Mar;58(1):37-42.
The paper presents issues associated with pronouncing opinions in cases of declaration of will invalidation for civil courts. The authors discuss differences between assessment of consciousness and discretion in last will and testament cases and in cases, where a living person attempts to invalidate his previous will drawn up by a notary. The objective of the report is an attempt at defining factors that play a significant role in formulating conclusions of such opinions, as well as determination of the competence of experts and indicating in what situations the adjudication of the case would be aided by a psychiatric opinion, a psychological opinion, or a complex opinion.
本文提出了民事法庭宣布遗嘱无效案件中发表意见所涉及的问题。作者讨论了在遗嘱案件以及活人试图使先前由公证人起草的遗嘱无效的案件中，意识评估与判断力评估之间的差异。该报告的目的是试图确定在形成此类意见结论时起重要作用的因素，以及确定专家的权限，并指出在哪些情况下精神病学意见、心理学意见或综合意见会有助于案件的裁决。
